You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@brooklyn.apache.org by Aled Sage <al...@gmail.com> on 2014/11/12 17:45:31 UTC
[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating [rc1]
(Is this right to have a separate [DISCUSS] thread (I'm copying what was
done in jclouds).
The differences from rc0 are:
* GPL and LGPL references removed from NOTICE, having confirmed with
reviewed the relevant config files and discussed with JBoss.
* General tidy of NOTICE file.
* General tidy of comments in pom.xml about RAT exclusions.
---
I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of the
licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
(it doesn't include all of them).
It does say:
OTHER LICENSES
This software incorporates minor components developed elsewhere, as
described in
the accompanying NOTICE file. In addition to the Apache License 2.0
(above),
the other licenses referenced there under which those components are
used are:
and then gives the MIT and New BSD licenses.
---
Feedback much appreciated!
====
**
*Checklist (all items optional, mark only those personally verified):*
*
[*Y*] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[*Y*] Expanded source archive matches contents of RC tag.
[*Y*] Expanded source archive builds and passes tests.
[**] LICENSE is present and correct.
[ ] NOTICE is present and correct, including copyright date.
[ ] All files have license headers where appropriate.
[ ] All dependencies have compatible licenses.
[ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[*Y*] I follow this project's commits list.
*
On 12/11/2014 16:20, Aled Sage wrote:
> This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn
> 0.7.0-M2-incubating (RC1).
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brooklyn/apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc1
>
>
> The Git commit ID is edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-brooklyn.git;a=commit;h=edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/aledsage.asc
>
> Checksums of apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc0.tar.gz:
> MD5: 9859ca752042e84c3381cc977623197a
> SHA1: 449d2f375f2b61aa8430d56687b9817019bdf18f
> SHA256: 5b4874527c32ef61b18d7d4bed4663a777dcd18bae3ed20662d022d92cfc1f76
>
> KEYS file available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/brooklyn/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Brooklyn
> 0.7.0-M2-incubating.
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Aled Sage
Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Aled Sage <al...@gmail.com>.
Agreed we'll need to cancel the vote, but would really appreciate if folk can take a look at what else will need fixed, rather than us fixing just one thing at a time per RC.
Any more feedback greatly appreciated.
Aled
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 Nov 2014, at 22:45, Alex Heneveld <al...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>
>
> Aled-
>
> > I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of the licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
> > (it doesn't include all of them).
>
> It should include all, and it did include all when I went through it. Let's either add the new licenses or remove
> where they only apply to config files where the license terms are weaker.
>
> I think this means cancelling the VOTE again. :)
>
> Best
> Alex
>
>
>
>> On 12/11/2014 16:45, Aled Sage wrote:
>> (Is this right to have a separate [DISCUSS] thread (I'm copying what was done in jclouds).
>>
>> The differences from rc0 are:
>>
>> * GPL and LGPL references removed from NOTICE, having confirmed with
>> reviewed the relevant config files and discussed with JBoss.
>> * General tidy of NOTICE file.
>> * General tidy of comments in pom.xml about RAT exclusions.
>>
>> ---
>> I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of the licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
>> (it doesn't include all of them).
>> It does say:
>>
>> OTHER LICENSES
>>
>> This software incorporates minor components developed elsewhere, as
>> described in
>> the accompanying NOTICE file. In addition to the Apache License 2.0
>> (above),
>> the other licenses referenced there under which those components are
>> used are:
>>
>> and then gives the MIT and New BSD licenses.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Feedback much appreciated!
>>
>> ====
>>
>> **
>>
>> *Checklist (all items optional, mark only those personally verified):*
>>
>> *
>>
>> [*Y*] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>>
>> [*Y*] Expanded source archive matches contents of RC tag.
>>
>> [*Y*] Expanded source archive builds and passes tests.
>>
>> [**] LICENSE is present and correct.
>>
>> [ ] NOTICE is present and correct, including copyright date.
>>
>> [ ] All files have license headers where appropriate.
>>
>> [ ] All dependencies have compatible licenses.
>>
>> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>>
>> [*Y*] I follow this project's commits list.
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>>> On 12/11/2014 16:20, Aled Sage wrote:
>>> This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating (RC1).
>>>
>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brooklyn/apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc1
>>>
>>> The Git commit ID is edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-brooklyn.git;a=commit;h=edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>>>
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/aledsage.asc
>>>
>>> Checksums of apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc0.tar.gz:
>>> MD5: 9859ca752042e84c3381cc977623197a
>>> SHA1: 449d2f375f2b61aa8430d56687b9817019bdf18f
>>> SHA256: 5b4874527c32ef61b18d7d4bed4663a777dcd18bae3ed20662d022d92cfc1f76
>>>
>>> KEYS file available here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/brooklyn/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aled Sage
>
Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Alex Heneveld <al...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
Aled-
> I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of
the licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
> (it doesn't include all of them).
It should include all, and it did include all when I went through it.
Let's either add the new licenses or remove
where they only apply to config files where the license terms are weaker.
I think this means cancelling the VOTE again. :)
Best
Alex
On 12/11/2014 16:45, Aled Sage wrote:
> (Is this right to have a separate [DISCUSS] thread (I'm copying what
> was done in jclouds).
>
> The differences from rc0 are:
>
> * GPL and LGPL references removed from NOTICE, having confirmed with
> reviewed the relevant config files and discussed with JBoss.
> * General tidy of NOTICE file.
> * General tidy of comments in pom.xml about RAT exclusions.
>
> ---
> I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of
> the licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
> (it doesn't include all of them).
> It does say:
>
> OTHER LICENSES
>
> This software incorporates minor components developed elsewhere, as
> described in
> the accompanying NOTICE file. In addition to the Apache License 2.0
> (above),
> the other licenses referenced there under which those components are
> used are:
>
> and then gives the MIT and New BSD licenses.
>
> ---
>
> Feedback much appreciated!
>
> ====
>
> **
>
> *Checklist (all items optional, mark only those personally verified):*
>
> *
>
> [*Y*] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>
> [*Y*] Expanded source archive matches contents of RC tag.
>
> [*Y*] Expanded source archive builds and passes tests.
>
> [**] LICENSE is present and correct.
>
> [ ] NOTICE is present and correct, including copyright date.
>
> [ ] All files have license headers where appropriate.
>
> [ ] All dependencies have compatible licenses.
>
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> [*Y*] I follow this project's commits list.
>
> *
>
>
> On 12/11/2014 16:20, Aled Sage wrote:
>> This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn
>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating (RC1).
>>
>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brooklyn/apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc1
>>
>>
>> The Git commit ID is edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-brooklyn.git;a=commit;h=edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>>
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/aledsage.asc
>>
>> Checksums of apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc0.tar.gz:
>> MD5: 9859ca752042e84c3381cc977623197a
>> SHA1: 449d2f375f2b61aa8430d56687b9817019bdf18f
>> SHA256: 5b4874527c32ef61b18d7d4bed4663a777dcd18bae3ed20662d022d92cfc1f76
>>
>> KEYS file available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/brooklyn/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Brooklyn
>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aled Sage
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Aled Sage <al...@gmail.com>.
Correct.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 Nov 2014, at 19:12, Andrew Kennedy <an...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>
> Am I correct in understanding that this doesn't have any new features
> since RC0 apart from the NOTICE file changes?
>
> Andrew.
> --
> -- andrew kennedy ? distributed systems hacker :
> http://blog.abstractvisitorpattern.co.uk/ ;
>
>
>> On 12 November 2014 16:45, Aled Sage <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> (Is this right to have a separate [DISCUSS] thread (I'm copying what was
>> done in jclouds).
>>
>> The differences from rc0 are:
>>
>> * GPL and LGPL references removed from NOTICE, having confirmed with
>> reviewed the relevant config files and discussed with JBoss.
>> * General tidy of NOTICE file.
>> * General tidy of comments in pom.xml about RAT exclusions.
>>
>> ---
>> I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of the
>> licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
>> (it doesn't include all of them).
>> It does say:
>>
>> OTHER LICENSES
>>
>> This software incorporates minor components developed elsewhere, as
>> described in
>> the accompanying NOTICE file. In addition to the Apache License 2.0
>> (above),
>> the other licenses referenced there under which those components are
>> used are:
>>
>> and then gives the MIT and New BSD licenses.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Feedback much appreciated!
>>
>> ====
>>
>> **
>>
>> *Checklist (all items optional, mark only those personally verified):*
>>
>> *
>>
>> [*Y*] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>>
>> [*Y*] Expanded source archive matches contents of RC tag.
>>
>> [*Y*] Expanded source archive builds and passes tests.
>>
>> [**] LICENSE is present and correct.
>>
>> [ ] NOTICE is present and correct, including copyright date.
>>
>> [ ] All files have license headers where appropriate.
>>
>> [ ] All dependencies have compatible licenses.
>>
>> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>>
>> [*Y*] I follow this project's commits list.
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 12/11/2014 16:20, Aled Sage wrote:
>>>
>>> This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn
>>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating (RC1).
>>>
>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brooklyn/apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc1
>>>
>>> The Git commit ID is edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-brooklyn.git;a=commit;h=edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>>>
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/aledsage.asc
>>>
>>> Checksums of apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc0.tar.gz:
>>> MD5: 9859ca752042e84c3381cc977623197a
>>> SHA1: 449d2f375f2b61aa8430d56687b9817019bdf18f
>>> SHA256: 5b4874527c32ef61b18d7d4bed4663a777dcd18bae3ed20662d022d92cfc1f76
>>>
>>> KEYS file available here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/brooklyn/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Brooklyn
>>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aled Sage
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating [rc1]
Posted by Andrew Kennedy <an...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
Am I correct in understanding that this doesn't have any new features
since RC0 apart from the NOTICE file changes?
Andrew.
--
-- andrew kennedy ? distributed systems hacker :
http://blog.abstractvisitorpattern.co.uk/ ;
On 12 November 2014 16:45, Aled Sage <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (Is this right to have a separate [DISCUSS] thread (I'm copying what was
> done in jclouds).
>
> The differences from rc0 are:
>
> * GPL and LGPL references removed from NOTICE, having confirmed with
> reviewed the relevant config files and discussed with JBoss.
> * General tidy of NOTICE file.
> * General tidy of comments in pom.xml about RAT exclusions.
>
> ---
> I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of the
> licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
> (it doesn't include all of them).
> It does say:
>
> OTHER LICENSES
>
> This software incorporates minor components developed elsewhere, as
> described in
> the accompanying NOTICE file. In addition to the Apache License 2.0
> (above),
> the other licenses referenced there under which those components are
> used are:
>
> and then gives the MIT and New BSD licenses.
>
> ---
>
> Feedback much appreciated!
>
> ====
>
> **
>
> *Checklist (all items optional, mark only those personally verified):*
>
> *
>
> [*Y*] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>
> [*Y*] Expanded source archive matches contents of RC tag.
>
> [*Y*] Expanded source archive builds and passes tests.
>
> [**] LICENSE is present and correct.
>
> [ ] NOTICE is present and correct, including copyright date.
>
> [ ] All files have license headers where appropriate.
>
> [ ] All dependencies have compatible licenses.
>
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> [*Y*] I follow this project's commits list.
>
> *
>
>
>
> On 12/11/2014 16:20, Aled Sage wrote:
>>
>> This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn
>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating (RC1).
>>
>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brooklyn/apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc1
>>
>> The Git commit ID is edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-brooklyn.git;a=commit;h=edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/aledsage.asc
>>
>> Checksums of apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc0.tar.gz:
>> MD5: 9859ca752042e84c3381cc977623197a
>> SHA1: 449d2f375f2b61aa8430d56687b9817019bdf18f
>> SHA256: 5b4874527c32ef61b18d7d4bed4663a777dcd18bae3ed20662d022d92cfc1f76
>>
>> KEYS file available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/brooklyn/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Brooklyn
>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aled Sage
>
>