You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org by Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/19 18:01:33 UTC
Converting Trinidad and Tomahawk demos to facelets
Since using facelets over JSP is considered best practice should be Trinidad
and Tomahawk examples converted
to use facelets? It will give users much better starting point for new
applications.
-Mikhail
Re: Re: Converting Trinidad and Tomahawk demos to facelets
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
I didn't state that clearly enough.
My plan is to provide each example in jsp format, jspx format, and
facelets format.
On 8/19/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm very happy to have Facelets examples alongside
> of .jspx; but too many people use .jspx for even this
> huge fan of Facelets to suggest it be made the primary
> source of examples...
>
> -- Adam
>
>
>
> On 8/19/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sure. Converting tomahawk examples to jspx and to facelets is on my
> > todo list. But it's way down toward the bottom. Patches are always
> > welcome :-)
> >
> > On 8/19/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Since using facelets over JSP is considered best practice should be Trinidad
> > > and Tomahawk examples converted
> > > to use facelets? It will give users much better starting point for new
> > > applications.
> > >
> > > -Mikhail
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Re: Converting Trinidad and Tomahawk demos to facelets
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
I'm very happy to have Facelets examples alongside
of .jspx; but too many people use .jspx for even this
huge fan of Facelets to suggest it be made the primary
source of examples...
-- Adam
On 8/19/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure. Converting tomahawk examples to jspx and to facelets is on my
> todo list. But it's way down toward the bottom. Patches are always
> welcome :-)
>
> On 8/19/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since using facelets over JSP is considered best practice should be Trinidad
> > and Tomahawk examples converted
> > to use facelets? It will give users much better starting point for new
> > applications.
> >
> > -Mikhail
> >
> >
>
Re: Converting Trinidad and Tomahawk demos to facelets
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Sure. Converting tomahawk examples to jspx and to facelets is on my
todo list. But it's way down toward the bottom. Patches are always
welcome :-)
On 8/19/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since using facelets over JSP is considered best practice should be Trinidad
> and Tomahawk examples converted
> to use facelets? It will give users much better starting point for new
> applications.
>
> -Mikhail
>
>