You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/07 06:01:30 UTC

Re: What makes an Analyzer/Tokenizer/CharFilter/etc suitable for Solr?

Has this logic (default constructor or version flag) changed due to
LUCENE-4877 ? I rerun my tool and suddenly huge number of Factories
acquired a new constructor (e.g. MappingCharFilterFactory).

Regards,
   Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all
at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working.  (Anonymous  - via GTD
book)


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Chris Hostetter
<ho...@fucit.org> wrote:
>
> : *) Have a default empty constructor
> :
> : My preliminary tests seem to indicate this is the case. Am I missing
> : anything.
>
> Any analyzer that has an empty construct *or* a constructor that takes in
> a lucene "Version" object may be specified.
>
> I've updated the wiki to make this more clear...
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#Specifying_an_Analyzer_in_the_schema
>
> For CharFilters, Tokenizers, TokenFilters: they must have a factory of the
> appropriate type (CharFilterFactory, TokenizerFactory, TokenFilterFactory)
>
>
> -Hoss