You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2013/06/07 00:37:26 UTC
VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out as
0.95.1?
Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep the
vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
course,
any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly like
to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
palatable.
Thanks,
St.Ack
1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
2.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com>.
A configuration issue. Authorization has to be enabled. RPC does
authorization checking no matter it is enabled or not. This is a minor nit
we can fix later.
Thanks,
Jimmy
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > My bad, in HBasePolicyProvider, this interface is referred as
> > RegionServerStatusService.BlockingInterface.class. Some issue to link
> the
> > name together?
> >
> >
> Probably hbase-8214 Jimmy. Make issue, stick exception in it, and assign
> to me?
> St.Ack
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> My bad, in HBasePolicyProvider, this interface is referred as
> RegionServerStatusService.BlockingInterface.class. Some issue to link the
> name together?
>
>
Probably hbase-8214 Jimmy. Make issue, stick exception in it, and assign
to me?
St.Ack
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com>.
My bad, in HBasePolicyProvider, this interface is referred as
RegionServerStatusService.BlockingInterface.class. Some issue to link the
name together?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Have anyone tested the secure HBase? I have some problem to get it work.
> For me, the region server could not connect to the master due to
>
> 2013-06-11 15:19:52,101 DEBUG [IPC Reader 6 on port 36000] ipc.RpcServer:
> Connection authorization failed: Protocol interface
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.RegionServerStatusProtos$RegionServerStatusService$BlockingInterface
> is not known.
>
> Is this some configuration issue, or an issue introduced by HBASE-8214? I
> don't see this interface in class HBasePolicyProvider.
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I've not tested the public release, only my own build. I also haven't
>> tested hadoop1.
>> I've got a test in progress, let me run it for a while and coming back to
>> you.
>>
>> My general feeling from my previous tests is that this rc is much more
>> stable than 0.95.0 or trunk. But let's wait a little to confirm this.
>>
>> In any case, we will need to have maven working for the RC2 imho. If it
>> has
>> to be a file copy, well, let's do that.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon. Sounds like our mvn publishing needs a
>> > bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?). You +1 on this as
>> dev
>> > release?
>> >
>> > St.Ack
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
>> > >
>> > > If I build hbase locally, with
>> > > mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
>> > > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
>> > > => Compilation & execution works.
>> > >
>> > > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
>> > > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
>> > >
>> > > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
>> > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
>> > > at
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
>> > >
>> > > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only,
>> as
>> > > expected.
>> > >
>> > > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from
>> which
>> > > repo?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have
>> anything
>> > on
>> > > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security
>> reasons
>> > (if
>> > > the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > >
>> > > Nicolas
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this
>> out as
>> > > > 0.95.1?
>> > > >
>> > > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep
>> > the
>> > > > vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
>> > > >
>> > > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
>> > > >
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
>> > > >
>> > > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
>> > > >
>> > > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
>> > > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI,
>> and
>> > of
>> > > > course,
>> > > > any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would
>> particularly
>> > > like
>> > > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
>> > > > palatable.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > St.Ack
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
>> > > > 2.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
> * the sigs match.
> * The change log is good.
> * hbase starts up
> * it tests can pass with some retries
>
>
Thanks E.
Let me roll out the release not it has 3 binding +1s.
Thanks all,
St.Ack
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org>.
+1
* the sigs match.
* The change log is good.
* hbase starts up
* it tests can pass with some retries
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Have anyone tested the secure HBase? I have some problem to get it work.
> For me, the region server could not connect to the master due to
>
> 2013-06-11 15:19:52,101 DEBUG [IPC Reader 6 on port 36000] ipc.RpcServer:
> Connection authorization failed: Protocol interface
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.RegionServerStatusProtos$RegionServerStatusService$BlockingInterface
> is not known.
>
> Is this some configuration issue, or an issue introduced by HBASE-8214? I
> don't see this interface in class HBasePolicyProvider.
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I've not tested the public release, only my own build. I also haven't
> > tested hadoop1.
> > I've got a test in progress, let me run it for a while and coming back to
> > you.
> >
> > My general feeling from my previous tests is that this rc is much more
> > stable than 0.95.0 or trunk. But let's wait a little to confirm this.
> >
> > In any case, we will need to have maven working for the RC2 imho. If it
> has
> > to be a file copy, well, let's do that.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon. Sounds like our mvn publishing needs
> a
> > > bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?). You +1 on this as
> dev
> > > release?
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
> > > >
> > > > If I build hbase locally, with
> > > > mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
> > > > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
> > > > => Compilation & execution works.
> > > >
> > > > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
> > > > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
> > > >
> > > > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
> > > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
> > > >
> > > > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only,
> > as
> > > > expected.
> > > >
> > > > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from
> > which
> > > > repo?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have
> > anything
> > > on
> > > > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security
> reasons
> > > (if
> > > > the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this
> out
> > as
> > > > > 0.95.1?
> > > > >
> > > > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets
> keep
> > > the
> > > > > vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
> > > > >
> > > > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
> > > > >
> > > > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
> > > > >
> > > > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > > > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI,
> and
> > > of
> > > > > course,
> > > > > any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would
> particularly
> > > > like
> > > > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > > > > palatable.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > St.Ack
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > > > > 2.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com>.
Have anyone tested the secure HBase? I have some problem to get it work.
For me, the region server could not connect to the master due to
2013-06-11 15:19:52,101 DEBUG [IPC Reader 6 on port 36000] ipc.RpcServer:
Connection authorization failed: Protocol interface
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.RegionServerStatusProtos$RegionServerStatusService$BlockingInterface
is not known.
Is this some configuration issue, or an issue introduced by HBASE-8214? I
don't see this interface in class HBasePolicyProvider.
Thanks,
Jimmy
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've not tested the public release, only my own build. I also haven't
> tested hadoop1.
> I've got a test in progress, let me run it for a while and coming back to
> you.
>
> My general feeling from my previous tests is that this rc is much more
> stable than 0.95.0 or trunk. But let's wait a little to confirm this.
>
> In any case, we will need to have maven working for the RC2 imho. If it has
> to be a file copy, well, let's do that.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon. Sounds like our mvn publishing needs a
> > bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?). You +1 on this as dev
> > release?
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
> > >
> > > If I build hbase locally, with
> > > mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
> > > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
> > > => Compilation & execution works.
> > >
> > > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
> > > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
> > >
> > > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
> > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
> > >
> > > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only,
> as
> > > expected.
> > >
> > > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from
> which
> > > repo?
> > >
> > >
> > > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have
> anything
> > on
> > > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security reasons
> > (if
> > > the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out
> as
> > > > 0.95.1?
> > > >
> > > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep
> > the
> > > > vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
> > > >
> > > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
> > > >
> > > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
> > > >
> > > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and
> > of
> > > > course,
> > > > any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly
> > > like
> > > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > > > palatable.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > > > 2.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>.
I've not tested the public release, only my own build. I also haven't
tested hadoop1.
I've got a test in progress, let me run it for a while and coming back to
you.
My general feeling from my previous tests is that this rc is much more
stable than 0.95.0 or trunk. But let's wait a little to confirm this.
In any case, we will need to have maven working for the RC2 imho. If it has
to be a file copy, well, let's do that.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon. Sounds like our mvn publishing needs a
> bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?). You +1 on this as dev
> release?
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
> >
> > If I build hbase locally, with
> > mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
> > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
> > => Compilation & execution works.
> >
> > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
> > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
> >
> > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
> > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
> >
> > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only, as
> > expected.
> >
> > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from which
> > repo?
> >
> >
> > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have anything
> on
> > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security reasons
> (if
> > the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> > > 0.95.1?
> > >
> > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep
> the
> > > vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
> > >
> > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
> > >
> > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
> > >
> > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and
> of
> > > course,
> > > any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly
> > like
> > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > > palatable.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > > 2.
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > >
> >
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon. Sounds like our mvn publishing needs a
bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?). You +1 on this as dev
release?
St.Ack
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
>
> If I build hbase locally, with
> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
> then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
> => Compilation & execution works.
>
> If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
> but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
>
> Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
> Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>
> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
>
> When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only, as
> expected.
>
> => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from which
> repo?
>
>
> As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have anything on
> screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security reasons (if
> the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> > 0.95.1?
> >
> > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep the
> > vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
> >
> > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
> >
> > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
> >
> > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
> > course,
> > any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly
> like
> > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > palatable.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > 2.
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Elliott,
I was trying something similar that worked in the past, but couldn't make
it work on this last release. I will retry with yours later (my machine is
running a test right now), except if it already worked for you on this
0.95.1 release?
As well, it's good enough for an alpha release, but do know what we will do
for the official one?
IIRC, duplicating the pom.xml was considered as a possible solution?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
> So the maven pom's still point to 1.0 as default no matter what version of
> the client you point at. I've gotten around this by being very explicit:
> <dependencies>
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> <artifactId>hbase-client</artifactId>
> <version>${hbase.version}</version>
>
> <exclusions>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
> <artifactId>hadoop-core</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId>
> <artifactId>jetty</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>com.sun.jdmk</groupId>
> <artifactId>jmxtools</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>com.sun.jmx</groupId>
> <artifactId>jmxri</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> </exclusions>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
> <artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId>
> <version>2.0.0-alpha</version>
> </dependency>
> </dependencies>
>
>
> It's not awesome but it got me working.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
> >
> > If I build hbase locally, with
> > mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
> > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
> > => Compilation & execution works.
> >
> > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
> > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
> >
> > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
> > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
> >
> > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only, as
> > expected.
> >
> > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from which
> > repo?
> >
> >
> > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have anything
> on
> > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security reasons
> (if
> > the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> > > 0.95.1?
> > >
> > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep
> the
> > > vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
> > >
> > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
> > >
> > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
> > >
> > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and
> of
> > > course,
> > > any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly
> > like
> > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > > palatable.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > > 2.
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > >
> >
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
> So the maven pom's still point to 1.0 as default no matter what version of
> the client you point at.
Where is this pointing?
I just uploaded new deploy. Here is client pom:
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repo_groups/snapshots-group/content/org/apache/hbase/hbase-client/0.95.1-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/hbase-client-0.95.1-hadoop2-20130612.070302-1.pom
Where is it pointing to hadoop1? I see mention of each of the profiles but
no explicit hadoop verison.
Is it because we default hadoop1 profile?
I just tried to publish 0.95.1-hadoop2 and it looks like the maven release
plugin ignores my passing of profile (fun, fun, fun).
Thanks E,
St.Ack
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org>.
So the maven pom's still point to 1.0 as default no matter what version of
the client you point at. I've gotten around this by being very explicit:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
<artifactId>hbase-client</artifactId>
<version>${hbase.version}</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
<artifactId>hadoop-core</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId>
<artifactId>jetty</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>com.sun.jdmk</groupId>
<artifactId>jmxtools</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>com.sun.jmx</groupId>
<artifactId>jmxri</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
<artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId>
<version>2.0.0-alpha</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
It's not awesome but it got me working.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
>
> If I build hbase locally, with
> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
> then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
> => Compilation & execution works.
>
> If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
> but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
>
> Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
> Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>
> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
>
> When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only, as
> expected.
>
> => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from which
> repo?
>
>
> As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have anything on
> screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security reasons (if
> the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> > 0.95.1?
> >
> > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep the
> > vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
> >
> > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
> >
> > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
> >
> > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
> > course,
> > any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly
> like
> > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > palatable.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > 2.
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
If I build hbase locally, with
mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
=> Compilation & execution works.
If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only, as
expected.
=> Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from which
repo?
As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have anything on
screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security reasons (if
the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> 0.95.1?
>
> Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep the
> vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
>
> The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
>
> Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
>
> All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
> course,
> any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly like
> to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> palatable.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> 2.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
+1, it basically works.
I also found these annoyances:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8710
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8711
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8712
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8713
J-D
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> 0.95.1?
>
> Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep the
> vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
>
> The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
>
> Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
>
> All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
> course,
> any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly like
> to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> palatable.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> 2.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC