You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com> on 2014/02/19 10:07:39 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
Hello,
Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-3272 to
myself.
Thanks,
Sonal
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Murali Reddy <Mu...@citrix.com>
> Date: Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>, Chiradeep
> Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>
>
>
>
> Sonal,
>
> There may be mix up on the problem statement of the bug 3272. Sorry I did
> not elaborate enough in the bug.
>
> So there are multiple event types that are generated by CS, action events,
> usage events, resource state change events and alerts. Current problem is
> all the events gets published on the event bus when event bus is enabled.
> Intent of the bug is to introduce global setting config parameters to
> specify which category of events to be published or not be published on
> the event bus. For e.g if global config param says to publish only usage
> events, then only usage events should be published on the event bus.
>
> If your intent is to create generic mechanism to add meta-data to events
> that event bus can interpret and do specific action/configuration then it
> might make sense to open a different bug and elaborate what you want to
> address.
>
> Thanks,
> Murali
>
>
> On 16/12/13 1:11 PM, "Sonal Ojha" <so...@sungard.com> wrote:
>
> >As per the problem statement the config parameters would be the deciding
> >factor for the behavior of the events on the event bus. A subscriber would
> >never decide the behavior , instead the publisher of the event would add
> >config parameters to the events. On basis of these parameters the wrapper
> >over the queue broker could decide the actions to be performed on the
> >events. For example, the publisher of vm start event added a configuration
> >parameter "expiry" to the event. On basis of this parameter the wrapper
> >over the message queue broker would decide when should the vm start event
> >be expired / deleted from the queue. The subscriber of the event will be
> >able to read / fetch the event until its expired.
> >
> >There could be more than one config parameters attached to an event and so
> >the proposal is to add all these config parameters into a Map instead of
> >having only one config parameter added as a variable to the EventCategory
> >class.
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Forgive me for my ignorance , why can't this be done by the client that
> >> is receiving the events? Note that multiple clients can subscribe to the
> >> event bus: this requirement is specific to one client?
> >>
> >> From: Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>
> >> Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:36 PM
> >> To: Chiradeep Vittal <ch...@citrix.com>
> >> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
> >>
> >> One of the use case be to delete only vm power on/off events from the
> >> event queue, other be to persist all the update events on virtual
> >>machines
> >> on the queue. The map of configuration parameters would be helpful to
> >> decide such behaviors.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >> Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Some more description of the use cases would be helpful. What is the
> >>>pain
> >>> point it is addressing?
> >>>
> >>> On 12/11/13 3:26 AM, "Sonal Ojha" <so...@sungard.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Hello,
> >>> >
> >>> >As per the description in the bug I would like to propose to
> >>>introduce a
> >>> >new instance variable configParameters of type HashMap to the
> >>> >EventCategory
> >>> >class.Currently, it could store one config parameter
> >>> >"publish.action.events"(key as String) and True (value as Boolean) but
> >>> >later it could add more config parameters to change the behavior of
> >>> >events.
> >>> >
> >>> >Thoughts / suggestions ?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >--
> >>> >
> >>> >Thanks and Regards,
> >>> >
> >>> >*Sonal Ojha* EURO Senior Engineer Product Development EURO SunGard IT
> >>> >Availability
> >>> >
> >>> >Mobile +91-9922412645 EURO E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Thanks and Regards,
> >>
> >> *Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT
> >> Availability
> >>
> >> Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Thanks and Regards,
> >
> >*Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT
> >Availability
> >
> >Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
*Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT
Availability
Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
Posted by Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>.
I can add now, don't know what went good this time.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Well Sonal,
>
> Can you give us some diagnostic info then? please log in anew and try
> to add a comment to your ticket. and then let us know...
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Alex Huang <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Yes.
> >
> > --Alex
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:31 AM
> >> To: Sonal Ojha; David Nalley
> >> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
> >>
> >> I have to refer to the project owner here.
> >> @David: if I add someone to 'Contributors', should he be able to add
> >> comments to tickets?
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Daan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Dann, but I am unable to add comments to the jira. Can those
> >> > privileges be granted as well ??
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Daan Hoogland
> >> > <da...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha <sonal.ojha@sungard.com
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Sonal
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> You should have the rights now
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Daan
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Thanks and Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Sonal Ojha * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT
> >> > Availability
> >> >
> >> > Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
*Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT
Availability
Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Well Sonal,
Can you give us some diagnostic info then? please log in anew and try
to add a comment to your ticket. and then let us know...
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Alex Huang <Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> --Alex
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:31 AM
>> To: Sonal Ojha; David Nalley
>> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
>>
>> I have to refer to the project owner here.
>> @David: if I add someone to 'Contributors', should he be able to add
>> comments to tickets?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks Dann, but I am unable to add comments to the jira. Can those
>> > privileges be granted as well ??
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Daan Hoogland
>> > <da...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Sonal
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You should have the rights now
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Daan
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Thanks and Regards,
>> >
>> > Sonal Ojha * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT
>> > Availability
>> >
>> > Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
--
Daan
RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
Posted by Alex Huang <Al...@citrix.com>.
Yes.
--Alex
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:31 AM
> To: Sonal Ojha; David Nalley
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
>
> I have to refer to the project owner here.
> @David: if I add someone to 'Contributors', should he be able to add
> comments to tickets?
>
> thanks,
> Daan
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks Dann, but I am unable to add comments to the jira. Can those
> > privileges be granted as well ??
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Daan Hoogland
> > <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Sonal
> >>
> >>
> >> You should have the rights now
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> > Sonal Ojha * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT
> > Availability
> >
> > Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
I have to refer to the project owner here.
@David: if I add someone to 'Contributors', should he be able to add
comments to tickets?
thanks,
Daan
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dann, but I am unable to add comments to the jira. Can those
> privileges be granted as well ??
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Sonal
>>
>>
>> You should have the rights now
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Sonal Ojha * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT Availability
>
> Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
--
Daan
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
Posted by Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>.
Thanks Dann, but I am unable to add comments to the jira. Can those
privileges be granted as well ??
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com>
> wrote:
> > Sonal
>
>
> You should have the rights now
>
> --
> Daan
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
*Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT
Availability
Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.ojha@sungard.com
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha <so...@sungard.com> wrote:
> Sonal
You should have the rights now
--
Daan