You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by rw...@apache.org on 2003/11/17 22:00:44 UTC

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/primitives/xdocs faq.xml navigation.xml

rwaldhoff    2003/11/17 13:00:44

  Modified:    primitives/xdocs faq.xml navigation.xml
  Log:
  update faq
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.2       +12 -8     jakarta-commons/primitives/xdocs/faq.xml
  
  Index: faq.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-commons/primitives/xdocs/faq.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.2
  diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
  --- faq.xml	16 Nov 2003 23:20:21 -0000	1.1
  +++ faq.xml	17 Nov 2003 21:00:44 -0000	1.2
  @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
   <dd>
   <p>
   The main advantage of the primitive collections is that they are signficantly smaller than their java.util equivalents.
  -How much smaller?  Well, consider this table:
  +How much smaller?
   </p>
   <table border="1" cellspacing="0">
    <tr>
  @@ -82,26 +82,30 @@
   data.
   </p>
   <p>
  -In the pre-autoboxing (JDK 1.5) world, you may also find the primitive collections easier 
  +Finally, in the pre-autoboxing (JDK 1.5) world, you may also find the primitive collections easier 
   to work with, since you'll waste fewer keystrokes manually boxing and un-boxing the 
   primitives and their Object wrappers.  For instance, to sum an ArrayList of Integers, you 
   might write something like:
   </p>
  -<pre>int sum = 0;
  +<pre>
  +int sum = 0;
   for(Iterator iter = list.iterator(); iter.hasNext(); ) {
     sum += ((Integer)(iter.next())).intValue();
  -}</pre>
  +}
  +</pre>
   <p>
   The IntList equivalent would be:
   </p>
  -<pre>int sum = 0;
  +<pre>
  +int sum = 0;
   for(IntIterator iter = list.iterator(); iter.hasNext(); ) {
     sum += iter.next();
  -}</pre>
  +}
  +</pre>
   </dd>
   
  -<dt>Q: But isn't this overkill?  Aren't the time and space efficiencies 
  -insignificant for the size and number of collections used by most applications?</dt>
  +<dt>Q: But aren't the time and space efficiencies insignificant for 
  +the size and number of collections used by most applications?</dt>
   <dd>
   <p>
   Yes.
  
  
  
  1.3       +1 -0      jakarta-commons/primitives/xdocs/navigation.xml
  
  Index: navigation.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-commons/primitives/xdocs/navigation.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- navigation.xml	27 Oct 2003 20:55:56 -0000	1.2
  +++ navigation.xml	17 Nov 2003 21:00:44 -0000	1.3
  @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
     <body>
       <menu name="Commons Primitives">
         <item name="Overview" href="/index.html"/>
  +      <item name="FAQ" href="/faq.html"/>
       </menu>
       &commons-nav;
     </body>
  
  
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org