You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl> on 2010/01/11 09:49:51 UTC
Commit access for wicket-stuff (wicket-security)
Hi all,
After Maurice's car accident, no-one really stood up to maintain wicket-
security. I would like to continue the work on his project, because we at
Topicus (the company Maurice worked for) still heavily depend on Wasp/Swarm.
My goal is to release stable versions of wicket-security, so we no longer need
to depend on SNAPSHOT. I also would like to add some new features, like a
ComponentSubclassPermission, which was discussed on the wicket-users mailing
list.
Can I get commit access for wicket-stuff? My SF id is 'papegaaij'.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
Re: Commit access for wicket-stuff (wicket-security)
Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
Hi Olger,
Yes, I am aware of that. Wicket-security should remain backward compatible.
Unfortunately that will require me to revert your commit for anonymous inner
classes, which breaks some of our applications (and probably others as well).
However, I will not do so before adding the ComponentSubclassPermission, which
we discussed on wicket-users last week.
My first focus is on the wicket 1.3.x branch, which does not have a stable
release version. I've just merged the changes from trunk to that branch and am
now working on the pom.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
On Monday 11 January 2010 11:38:00 Olger Warnier wrote:
> Hi Emond,
>
> Good luck and have fun.
> Please note there are others (outside topicus) that depend on the wicket
> security framework.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Olger
>
> On 11 jan 2010, at 10:08, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Monday 11 January 2010 09:58:33 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >> Added.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Emond Papegaaij
> >>
> >> <em...@topicus.nl> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> After Maurice's car accident, no-one really stood up to maintain
> >>> wicket- security. I would like to continue the work on his project,
> >>> because we at Topicus (the company Maurice worked for) still heavily
> >>> depend on Wasp/Swarm.
> >>>
> >>> My goal is to release stable versions of wicket-security, so we no
> >>> longer need to depend on SNAPSHOT. I also would like to add some new
> >>> features, like a ComponentSubclassPermission, which was discussed on
> >>> the wicket-users mailing list.
> >>>
> >>> Can I get commit access for wicket-stuff? My SF id is 'papegaaij'.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Emond Papegaaij
>
Re: Commit access for wicket-stuff (wicket-security)
Posted by Olger Warnier <ol...@xs4all.nl>.
Hi Emond,
Good luck and have fun.
Please note there are others (outside topicus) that depend on the wicket security framework.
Kind Regards,
Olger
On 11 jan 2010, at 10:08, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
> Thanks
>
> On Monday 11 January 2010 09:58:33 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> Added.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Emond Papegaaij
>>
>> <em...@topicus.nl> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After Maurice's car accident, no-one really stood up to maintain wicket-
>>> security. I would like to continue the work on his project, because we at
>>> Topicus (the company Maurice worked for) still heavily depend on
>>> Wasp/Swarm.
>>>
>>> My goal is to release stable versions of wicket-security, so we no longer
>>> need to depend on SNAPSHOT. I also would like to add some new features,
>>> like a ComponentSubclassPermission, which was discussed on the
>>> wicket-users mailing list.
>>>
>>> Can I get commit access for wicket-stuff? My SF id is 'papegaaij'.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Emond Papegaaij
>>
Re: Commit access for wicket-stuff (wicket-security)
Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
Thanks
On Monday 11 January 2010 09:58:33 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Added.
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Emond Papegaaij
>
> <em...@topicus.nl> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After Maurice's car accident, no-one really stood up to maintain wicket-
> > security. I would like to continue the work on his project, because we at
> > Topicus (the company Maurice worked for) still heavily depend on
> > Wasp/Swarm.
> >
> > My goal is to release stable versions of wicket-security, so we no longer
> > need to depend on SNAPSHOT. I also would like to add some new features,
> > like a ComponentSubclassPermission, which was discussed on the
> > wicket-users mailing list.
> >
> > Can I get commit access for wicket-stuff? My SF id is 'papegaaij'.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Emond Papegaaij
>
Re: Commit access for wicket-stuff (wicket-security)
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Added.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Emond Papegaaij
<em...@topicus.nl> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After Maurice's car accident, no-one really stood up to maintain wicket-
> security. I would like to continue the work on his project, because we at
> Topicus (the company Maurice worked for) still heavily depend on Wasp/Swarm.
>
> My goal is to release stable versions of wicket-security, so we no longer need
> to depend on SNAPSHOT. I also would like to add some new features, like a
> ComponentSubclassPermission, which was discussed on the wicket-users mailing
> list.
>
> Can I get commit access for wicket-stuff? My SF id is 'papegaaij'.
>
> Best regards,
> Emond Papegaaij
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4