You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> on 2006/04/22 01:13:12 UTC
Remove jmx-debug application
I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to
execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect
to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX
consoles out there.
For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx
console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
console as a portlet.
This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
ObjectName methods on the kernel.
What do you think?
-dain
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Posted by Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com>.
Looks like you can...
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/jconsole.html
- sachin
On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:00 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> The extent if my playing was to poke mbeans. I have no idea if it
> can graph data. If it can't maybe someone knows of a better one
> that can.
>
> -dain
>
> On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> OK, but what can you do with it? Just poke MBeans? Or can you
>> set up
>> charts of property values and alerts if certain thresholds are
>> exceeded and so on?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aaron
>>
>> On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>> jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector
>>>
>>> username: system
>>> password: manager
>>>
>>> Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right
>>>
>>> -dain
>>>
>>> On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>>
>>>> Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on
>>>> hooking
>>>> JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Aaron
>>>>
>>>> On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>>> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application.
>>>>> The
>>>>> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow
>>>>> you to
>>>>> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
>>>>> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can
>>>>> connect
>>>>> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX
>>>>> consoles out there.
>>>>>
>>>>> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new
>>>>> jmx
>>>>> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
>>>>> console as a portlet.
>>>>>
>>>>> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
>>>>> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> -dain
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
The extent if my playing was to poke mbeans. I have no idea if it
can graph data. If it can't maybe someone knows of a better one that
can.
-dain
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> OK, but what can you do with it? Just poke MBeans? Or can you set up
> charts of property values and alerts if certain thresholds are
> exceeded and so on?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>> jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector
>>
>> username: system
>> password: manager
>>
>> Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>
>>> Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on
>>> hooking
>>> JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aaron
>>>
>>> On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
>>>> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to
>>>> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
>>>> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can
>>>> connect
>>>> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX
>>>> consoles out there.
>>>>
>>>> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx
>>>> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
>>>> console as a portlet.
>>>>
>>>> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
>>>> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> -dain
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
OK, but what can you do with it? Just poke MBeans? Or can you set up
charts of property values and alerts if certain thresholds are
exceeded and so on?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector
>
> username: system
> password: manager
>
> Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right
>
> -dain
>
> On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> > Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking
> > JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
> >
> > On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
> >> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to
> >> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
> >> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect
> >> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX
> >> consoles out there.
> >>
> >> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx
> >> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
> >> console as a portlet.
> >>
> >> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
> >> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> -dain
> >>
>
>
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector
username: system
password: manager
Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right
-dain
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking
> JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
>> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to
>> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
>> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect
>> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX
>> consoles out there.
>>
>> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx
>> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
>> console as a portlet.
>>
>> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
>> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> -dain
>>
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
mc4j might work too, though it may need some updates to support 1.x,
not sure:
http://mc4j.org/
--jason
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking
> JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
>> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to
>> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
>> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect
>> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX
>> consoles out there.
>>
>> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx
>> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
>> console as a portlet.
>>
>> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
>> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> -dain
>>
>
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking
JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to
> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can connect
> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other JMX
> consoles out there.
>
> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx
> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
> console as a portlet.
>
> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
>
> What do you think?
>
> -dain
>
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
+1
--jason
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to
> execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a user can
> connect to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the other
> JMX consoles out there.
>
> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at integrating the new jmx
> console that was donted by Simon Godik in GERONIMO-1163 into the
> console as a portlet.
>
> This will also remove one of the biggest users of the deprecated
> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
>
> What do you think?
>
> -dain
>
Re: Remove jmx-debug application
Posted by Chris Cardona <ja...@yahoo.com>.
If no body started work on this JMX portlet I can
start working on it.
--- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug
> application. The
> application is very ugly and hard to us. Also
> doesn't allow you to
> execute simple operations like setAttribute or
> invoke, so it is
> really only useful for display purposes. Instead a
> user can connect
> to the server with jconsole in Java 5 or any of the
> other JMX
> consoles out there.
>
> For geronimo 1.2, I think we should look at
> integrating the new jmx
> console that was donted by Simon Godik in
> GERONIMO-1163 into the
> console as a portlet.
>
> This will also remove one of the biggest users of
> the deprecated
> ObjectName methods on the kernel.
>
> What do you think?
>
> -dain
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com