You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@pig.apache.org by zjffdu <zj...@gmail.com> on 2009/04/09 16:47:58 UTC
Does Pig have the plan to support for loop ?
Hi all,
Since Pig-Latin is script language, will it support the for loop in the
future? Because these days, I am generating a bunch of report based on the
same scripts, just a little different in the parameter. And I use the java
api of pig, then I can simulate the for loop. But there is a disadvantage
that I have to load the data each time, and it will cost a lot of time.
So if pig can support the for loop internally, it would be better.
Best regards,
Jeff Zhang
RE: Does Pig have the plan to support for loop ?
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Hi Jeff,
This is a topic of an ongoing debate - whether PigLatin should become a
full scripting language or whether bindings into other scripting
languages such as Python and/or Perl should be provided. The advantage
of the first approach is one stop shopping. The disadvantages the
complexity of the implementation of a full language and also, does the
world really need another scripting language.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: zjffdu [mailto:zjffdu@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 7:48 AM
> To: pig-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Does Pig have the plan to support for loop ?
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Since Pig-Latin is script language, will it support the for
> loop in the future? Because these days, I am generating a
> bunch of report based on the same scripts, just a little
> different in the parameter. And I use the java api of pig,
> then I can simulate the for loop. But there is a disadvantage
> that I have to load the data each time, and it will cost a
> lot of time.
>
>
>
> So if pig can support the for loop internally, it would be better.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jeff Zhang
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>