You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com> on 2015/04/30 13:04:21 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Hi,
the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
Summary of changes:
UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
- Requires Java 7
- Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
- Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources,
null values, more syntactic sugar)
- Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
- More exemplary script projects
- Many, many bug fixes
UIMA Ruta Workbench:
- Requires Java 7
- Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
- Bug fixes
This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating
the script project.
Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta
project"
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
Update site:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
Archive with all sources:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
... and here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
Peter
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Thanks Marshall :-)
comments below...
Am 08.05.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> spot check staging repo ruta-core - OK
>
> source release, ruta-core jar ruta-core-javadoc, ruta-core-sources from staging
> repo: sig OK (Do try and get key into the trusted-ring of Apache).
Yes. I missed the chance to get my key signed by thilo in dublin and I
don't know when I will meet again someone from the trusted ring. At
least Richard and I signed others keys signed some time ago, so the
chances are doubled :-)
> build from sources OK
>
> Issues fixed: label is "JIRA-Bericht" instead of JIRA-Report and headers are
> in German, also (e.g. Schlüssel ) (not a blocker, though)
> Issues fixed: number of issues matches (if you exclude the "Won't Fix" category)
> - OK
Doh. I created the rc at work with a new build machine and totally
forgot about the language setting for maven.
> compare w/ source - OK
>
> The Eclipse plugins are unsigned. We now have the ability to officially sign
> these, so at some point we should update our build process for Eclipse plugins
> to sign them :-) [Not a blocker]
Is it already available for us? Great :-)
> Eclipse plugins - installed OK into 4.2.2. I did notice that the plugins have
> no eclipse-style help - something perhaps for the future. [not a blocker]
I'll create an issue for it.
Best,
Peter
> I was able to create a test ruta project using the eclipse new wizard.
>
> Checked licenses and notices, confirmed that jars which have icons have the
> additional cc license and notice
>
> Overall, it appears to be a very clean RC!
>
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
> -Marshall Schor
>
> On 4/30/2015 7:04 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
>>
>> Summary of changes:
>>
>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>> - Requires Java 7
>> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
>> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources, null
>> values, more syntactic sugar)
>> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
>> - More exemplary script projects
>> - Many, many bug fixes
>>
>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>> - Requires Java 7
>> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
>> - Bug fixes
>>
>> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
>> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating the
>> script project.
>> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta project"
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>>
>> SVN tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>>
>> Update site:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>>
>>
>> Archive with all sources:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>>
>>
>> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>
>> ... and here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
spot check staging repo ruta-core - OK
source release, ruta-core jar ruta-core-javadoc, ruta-core-sources from staging
repo: sig OK (Do try and get key into the trusted-ring of Apache).
build from sources OK
Issues fixed: label is "JIRA-Bericht" instead of JIRA-Report and headers are
in German, also (e.g. Schlüssel ) (not a blocker, though)
Issues fixed: number of issues matches (if you exclude the "Won't Fix" category)
- OK
compare w/ source - OK
The Eclipse plugins are unsigned. We now have the ability to officially sign
these, so at some point we should update our build process for Eclipse plugins
to sign them :-) [Not a blocker]
Eclipse plugins - installed OK into 4.2.2. I did notice that the plugins have
no eclipse-style help - something perhaps for the future. [not a blocker]
I was able to create a test ruta project using the eclipse new wizard.
Checked licenses and notices, confirmed that jars which have icons have the
additional cc license and notice
Overall, it appears to be a very clean RC!
[X] +1 OK to release
-Marshall Schor
On 4/30/2015 7:04 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
>
> Summary of changes:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources, null
> values, more syntactic sugar)
> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
> - More exemplary script projects
> - Many, many bug fixes
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
> - Bug fixes
>
> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating the
> script project.
> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta project"
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>
> Update site:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
OK, thanks. -Marshall
On 5/6/2015 1:14 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Yes, it's created but not distributed.
>
> There is no real reason but some historical "motivation".
> First, I planned to provide the binary distribution for the users, but I could
> not decide if we should ship the complete UIMA SDK and all other dependencies
> with it. One the one hand, this would be necessary... on the other hand its
> not the common use case for users. They nomally use the update site or the
> maven artifacts as far as I know. So, I removed the binary distrubution again.
> However, then the release process uploaded the source-release to the staging
> site. If I remember correctly, there is a switch in the build process that
> skips this, if there is a binary distribution. Then I added it again, in order
> to use our common build process without any additional ruta hacks. The
> distribution is not up-to-date right now. My plan is to update it and
> distribute it if anyone asks for it (not happened so far).
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> Am 06.05.2015 um 18:03 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> Question: When I build from sources, using the profile apache-release, it
>> creates a ruta-2.3.0-bin.tar (signed etc.) I don't see this listed as one of
>> the release artifacts in your email. I looked at ruta-2.2.1 distribution, and
>> it doesn't have this artifact either.
>>
>> If it is not being distributed, is there any reason to build it? I had thought,
>> at one point, that Ruta could be used as a library, without the workbench, and
>> this packaging was for that purpose, but maybe I'm mis-remembering...
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 4/30/2015 7:04 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
>>>
>>> Summary of changes:
>>>
>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>> - Requires Java 7
>>> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
>>> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources, null
>>> values, more syntactic sugar)
>>> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
>>> - More exemplary script projects
>>> - Many, many bug fixes
>>>
>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>> - Requires Java 7
>>> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
>>> - Bug fixes
>>>
>>> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
>>> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating the
>>> script project.
>>> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta project"
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>>>
>>> SVN tag:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>>>
>>> Update site:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Archive with all sources:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>
>>> ... and here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Yes, it's created but not distributed.
There is no real reason but some historical "motivation".
First, I planned to provide the binary distribution for the users, but I
could not decide if we should ship the complete UIMA SDK and all other
dependencies with it. One the one hand, this would be necessary... on
the other hand its not the common use case for users. They nomally use
the update site or the maven artifacts as far as I know. So, I removed
the binary distrubution again. However, then the release process
uploaded the source-release to the staging site. If I remember
correctly, there is a switch in the build process that skips this, if
there is a binary distribution. Then I added it again, in order to use
our common build process without any additional ruta hacks. The
distribution is not up-to-date right now. My plan is to update it and
distribute it if anyone asks for it (not happened so far).
Best,
Peter
Am 06.05.2015 um 18:03 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Question: When I build from sources, using the profile apache-release, it
> creates a ruta-2.3.0-bin.tar (signed etc.) I don't see this listed as one of
> the release artifacts in your email. I looked at ruta-2.2.1 distribution, and
> it doesn't have this artifact either.
>
> If it is not being distributed, is there any reason to build it? I had thought,
> at one point, that Ruta could be used as a library, without the workbench, and
> this packaging was for that purpose, but maybe I'm mis-remembering...
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 4/30/2015 7:04 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
>>
>> Summary of changes:
>>
>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>> - Requires Java 7
>> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
>> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources, null
>> values, more syntactic sugar)
>> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
>> - More exemplary script projects
>> - Many, many bug fixes
>>
>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>> - Requires Java 7
>> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
>> - Bug fixes
>>
>> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
>> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating the
>> script project.
>> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta project"
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>>
>> SVN tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>>
>> Update site:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>>
>>
>> Archive with all sources:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>>
>>
>> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>
>> ... and here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Question: When I build from sources, using the profile apache-release, it
creates a ruta-2.3.0-bin.tar (signed etc.) I don't see this listed as one of
the release artifacts in your email. I looked at ruta-2.2.1 distribution, and
it doesn't have this artifact either.
If it is not being distributed, is there any reason to build it? I had thought,
at one point, that Ruta could be used as a library, without the workbench, and
this packaging was for that purpose, but maybe I'm mis-remembering...
-Marshall
On 4/30/2015 7:04 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
>
> Summary of changes:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources, null
> values, more syntactic sugar)
> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
> - More exemplary script projects
> - Many, many bug fixes
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
> - Bug fixes
>
> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating the
> script project.
> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta project"
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>
> Update site:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
compared svn-tag with source-release - OK (only the usual diff and some
.project files for script projects)
del .m2/../uima, mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
del .m2/../uima, mvn clean install source-release - OK
checked some NOTICE/LICENSE files - OK
checked some signatures - OK
installed workbench in luna sr2 with uima features present - OK
created project and tested a simple script - OK
[X] +1 OK to release
Peter
Am 30.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for
> voting.
>
> Summary of changes:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources,
> null values, more syntactic sugar)
> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
> - More exemplary script projects
> - Many, many bug fixes
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
> - Bug fixes
>
> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and
> updating the script project.
> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta
> project"
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>
> Update site:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
Re: [VOTE][CANCEL] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Hi,
I found a small but nasty bug in the AST grammar of the IDE, which is a
real blocker.
I have to cancel this vote and will create a new rc.
Best,
Peter
Am 30.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for
> voting.
>
> Summary of changes:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources,
> null values, more syntactic sugar)
> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
> - More exemplary script projects
> - Many, many bug fixes
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
> - Bug fixes
>
> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and
> updating the script project.
> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta
> project"
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>
> Update site:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I plan on getting to this today :-)
-Marshall
On 4/30/2015 7:04 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
>
> Summary of changes:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources, null
> values, more syntactic sugar)
> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
> - More exemplary script projects
> - Many, many bug fixes
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
> - Bug fixes
>
> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating the
> script project.
> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta project"
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>
> Update site:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
On 11.05.2015, at 09:41, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com> wrote:
>> Some examples contain a NOTICE/LICENSE file, others not - why?
>
> This could be a problem.
>
> Before this rc, only UIMA Ruta projects (which are not built with maven)
> contained these files. We had some discussion some time ago that these
> project do not contain these files. I don't know if it is really
> necessary (since they are only accessed as source and build no
> artifacts) but it didn't hurt to add them. The only maven project
> project ruta-ep-example-extensions specifies ruta-parent as parent und
> thus should copy these files when built.
>
> Now there are some more projects that do not contain these files:
> ruta-maven-example is a maven project, but specifies no parent at all
> (files won't be copied). ruta-tutorial-GermanNovels is a some sort of
> LaTeX project. No artifacts will be distributed for both project so I
> hope that this could maybe not be a blocker?
Since there is a LICENSE file covering the whole distro, I think the
files in the individual examples are redundant and not necessary - unless
the examples would not be ASL of course.
>> Questions - Should the "TM" be for "Apache UIMA" or "Apache UIMA Ruta"?
>
> Good question. I also thought about it and we should probably start to
> use it for Ruta. Did you notice any legal concerns when you introduced
> it for uimaFIT? Should it be Apache UIMA (TM) Ruta (TM), which looks a
> bit strange, or could we use Apache UIMA Ruta (TM)?
What I gathered from keeping my ear to the ground regarding trademark
issues was that:
1) we should attach "tm" to those things that we care about because
only active use establishes the trademark
2) if we cared, we could ask the foundation to register a trademark
I do not remember anybody complaining about using Apache uimaFIT (tm)
at any point.
>> The Spring JARs contain some sections in their LICENSE files not replicated in the LICENSE of the distribution / ruta engine JAR. These sections might not apply, but I wonder if anybody really checked if they do not apply. The Spring guys might just have copied stuff e.g. from ASM into Spring and spring-asm is in fact part of the ruta engine JAR. Sorry if this might have been discussed/observed before.
>
> Hmm, yes, there was a discussion, but I do not remember the details
> right now. We had some iterations and, afterwards, I was quite confident
> that the license file is correct. Maybe I even removed the mention again
> after the discussion. The dependency first came with uimaFIT. How did
> you handle it in the license file?
Most of the uimaFIT license files do not contain these extra statements
from the Spring JARs - because they do not contain code / binaries
from the Spring JARs. The uimaFIT distro comes with a separate license
file which contains these extra parts as the distro contains some
Spring libraries.
>> README file is still mentioning "uimaFIT JCasGenPomFriendly" - should be
>> upgraded to the Apache UIMA jcasgen-maven-plugin.
>
> Some people could still use the old variant, but I asume that the
> problem (double classes) could also occur with the maven plugin, right?
The README tells us how to remove a problem, but not why it is caused ;)
It looks like you are asking the use to only exclude Java files for the
built-in Ruta types, not for any generated Ruta types. Is that correct?
If so, couldn't the use tell the jcasgen-maven-plugin to avoid generating
JCas classes for these in the first place, e.g. using either
the "limitToProject" option or "typeSystemExcludes"?
Additional issue:
Link to the README in the previous release notes is dead:
http://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-2.2.1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
Cheers,
-- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Hi,
first of all: thanks for reviewing :-)
comments below...
Am 10.05.2015 um 22:19 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
> Some intermediate results and questions:
>
> Build from sources using clean repo and Oracle Java 1.8.0_45-b14 (without apache-release) - OK
>
> Build from sources using clean repo and Oracle Java 1.8.0_45-b14 (with apache-release) - JavaDoc does not build (not critical)
I used Java 7 for the release. I will try to reproduce it with Java 8
> German month in docs - not critial
>
> Example breaking out page boundary (PDF page 61) - not critical
I will take care of it.
> Some examples contain a NOTICE/LICENSE file, others not - why?
This could be a problem.
Before this rc, only UIMA Ruta projects (which are not built with maven)
contained these files. We had some discussion some time ago that these
project do not contain these files. I don't know if it is really
necessary (since they are only accessed as source and build no
artifacts) but it didn't hurt to add them. The only maven project
project ruta-ep-example-extensions specifies ruta-parent as parent und
thus should copy these files when built.
Now there are some more projects that do not contain these files:
ruta-maven-example is a maven project, but specifies no parent at all
(files won't be copied). ruta-tutorial-GermanNovels is a some sort of
LaTeX project. No artifacts will be distributed for both project so I
hope that this could maybe not be a blocker?
> Questions - Should the "TM" be for "Apache UIMA" or "Apache UIMA Ruta"?
Good question. I also thought about it and we should probably start to
use it for Ruta. Did you notice any legal concerns when you introduced
it for uimaFIT? Should it be Apache UIMA (TM) Ruta (TM), which looks a
bit strange, or could we use Apache UIMA Ruta (TM)?
> The Spring JARs contain some sections in their LICENSE files not replicated in the LICENSE of the distribution / ruta engine JAR. These sections might not apply, but I wonder if anybody really checked if they do not apply. The Spring guys might just have copied stuff e.g. from ASM into Spring and spring-asm is in fact part of the ruta engine JAR. Sorry if this might have been discussed/observed before.
Hmm, yes, there was a discussion, but I do not remember the details
right now. We had some iterations and, afterwards, I was quite confident
that the license file is correct. Maybe I even removed the mention again
after the discussion. The dependency first came with uimaFIT. How did
you handle it in the license file?
> README file is still mentioning "uimaFIT JCasGenPomFriendly" - should be
> upgraded to the Apache UIMA jcasgen-maven-plugin.
Some people could still use the old variant, but I asume that the
problem (double classes) could also occur with the maven plugin, right?
Best,
Peter
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 30.04.2015, at 13:04, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
>>
>> Summary of changes:
>>
>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>> - Requires Java 7
>> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
>> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources, null values, more syntactic sugar)
>> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
>> - More exemplary script projects
>> - Many, many bug fixes
>>
>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>> - Requires Java 7
>> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
>> - Bug fixes
>>
>> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
>> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating the script project.
>> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta project"
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>>
>> SVN tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>>
>> Update site:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>>
>> Archive with all sources:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>>
>> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>
>> ... and here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Peter
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.3.0 RC1
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
Some intermediate results and questions:
Build from sources using clean repo and Oracle Java 1.8.0_45-b14 (without apache-release) - OK
Build from sources using clean repo and Oracle Java 1.8.0_45-b14 (with apache-release) - JavaDoc does not build (not critical)
German month in docs - not critial
Example breaking out page boundary (PDF page 61) - not critical
Some examples contain a NOTICE/LICENSE file, others not - why?
Questions - Should the "TM" be for "Apache UIMA" or "Apache UIMA Ruta"?
The Spring JARs contain some sections in their LICENSE files not replicated in the LICENSE of the distribution / ruta engine JAR. These sections might not apply, but I wonder if anybody really checked if they do not apply. The Spring guys might just have copied stuff e.g. from ASM into Spring and spring-asm is in fact part of the ruta engine JAR. Sorry if this might have been discussed/observed before.
README file is still mentioning "uimaFIT JCasGenPomFriendly" - should be
upgraded to the Apache UIMA jcasgen-maven-plugin.
Cheers,
-- Richard
On 30.04.2015, at 13:04, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.0 is ready for voting.
>
> Summary of changes:
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Maven Plugin for UIMA Ruta
> - Extensions and simplifications of the language (external resources, null values, more syntactic sugar)
> - Improvements to Analysis Engines (RutaEngine, HtmlConverter)
> - More exemplary script projects
> - Many, many bug fixes
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> - Requires Java 7
> - Works now also in other project structures (Maven projects)
> - Bug fixes
>
> This release requires an update of script projects and its descriptors,
> e.g, in the UIMA Ruta Workbench by deleting all descriptors and updating the script project.
> Right-click on a project and select "UIMA Ruta -> Convert to UIMA Ruta project"
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1050/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.0
>
> Update site:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.0-rc1/ruta-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>
> Overall 67 issues have been fixed for this release.
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>
> ... and here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.0ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>