[DISCUSS] Re: [MINOR] About making IDEs' configuration to match checkstyle module

[Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>]

In general, the checkstyle module should be considered authoritative.
All of our IDE integration is done best-effort by folks who use those
IDEs.

So I'd be +1 on getting eclipse to match what we currently do via
command line. IIRC, there's a section on the ref guide on using
eclipse that we could update if we can't automate this for some
reason.

Any IntelliJ folks know if we have this same problem there?

-busbey

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:44 PM, TAK-LON WU <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Recently I hit a `ImportOrder` failure with the autobuild checkstyle module
> in branch-1, I cut a JIRA  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20837
>  for asking about the right import orders/layouts for master (or branch-1).
>
> beside that, I'm wondered if this is a checkstyle problem for
> master/branch-2 as well?
>
> btw this is the proposed import order in eclipse format aligning with
> checkstyle
> in master branch
> <https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/master/hbase-checkstyle/src/main/resources/hbase/checkstyle.xml>
>
>
> #Organize Import Order
>
> 5=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.shaded
>
> 4=org.apache.hbase.thirdparty
>
> 3=javax
>
> 2=java
>
> 1=
>
> 0=\#
>
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen