You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2004/04/27 00:09:20 UTC

Re: AHBL: promote or delete?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Daniel Quinlan writes:
>RHSBL and overlap:
>
>17934   0.871   0.092   T_RCVD_IN_AHBL_RHSBL,__RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL
>14374   0.698   0.090   T_RCVD_IN_AHBL_RHSBL,__RCVD_IN_SORBS
>13134   0.638   0.074   T_RCVD_IN_AHBL_RHSBL,RCVD_IN_XBL
>10697   0.520   0.071   T_RCVD_IN_AHBL_RHSBL,RCVD_IN_DSBL
>10612   0.516   0.096   T_RCVD_IN_AHBL_RHSBL,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
>7454    0.362   0.079   T_RCVD_IN_AHBL_RHSBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
>
>Lower overlap than the others, this might be worth keeping (and it's a
>separate query anyway).

I would say keep RHSBL, and leave the rest.  In particular, the blocking
of an entire Spanish ISP is a big "thumbs down" factor for me.  I'm
even a little lukewarm on RHSBL, too, just because it's another DNS
query and 9.11% for a DNSBL is not exactly stellar.

>Maybe we should let the perceptron take a whack at it.  So, why aren't
>we running the perceptron on nightly/weekly results?  ;-)

go for it!  bugzilla.spamassassin.org is crying out for new uses for
CPU time ;)

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFAjYiQQTcbUG5Y7woRAnp2AKCPQs7v0QH4f1UrEqrkYgwmdhY56gCg3KKH
wSFNLZGFrDxunqsuMhfHuD0=
=xY3j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Re: AHBL: promote or delete?

Posted by Daniel Quinlan <qu...@pathname.com>.
Daniel Quinlan wrote:

>> I don't think it's CPU time that's the issue...

Kelsey Cummings <kg...@sonic.net> writes:

> Has the box been sluggish?
>
> I can probably prop something up underneath it if you need more juice.

*grin*

I meant that it's people time.  Thanks, though.  :-)

Daniel

Re: AHBL: promote or delete?

Posted by Kelsey Cummings <kg...@sonic.net>.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 03:52:48PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> writes:
> 
> > go for it!  bugzilla.spamassassin.org is crying out for new uses for
> > CPU time ;)
> 
> I don't think it's CPU time that's the issue...

Has the box been sluggish?

I can probably prop something up underneath it if you need more juice.

-- 
Kelsey Cummings - kgc@sonic.net           sonic.net, inc.
System Administrator                      2260 Apollo Way
707.522.1000 (Voice)                      Santa Rosa, CA 95407
707.547.2199 (Fax)                        http://www.sonic.net/
Fingerprint = D5F9 667F 5D32 7347 0B79  8DB7 2B42 86B6 4E2C 3896

Re: AHBL: promote or delete?

Posted by Daniel Quinlan <qu...@pathname.com>.
Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> writes:

> go for it!  bugzilla.spamassassin.org is crying out for new uses for
> CPU time ;)

I don't think it's CPU time that's the issue...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Quinlan                     anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux,
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/    and open source consulting