HAVE_NETINET_IN_H ?

[Bill Stoddard <st...@raleigh.ibm.com>]

Maybe this is a silly question, but what is the purpose of HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
around ap_get_local_name() and ap_get_remote_name()?

Bill

Re: HAVE_NETINET_IN_H ?

[Chris Costello <ch...@calldei.com>]

On Mon, Oct 25, 1999, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Maybe this is a silly question, but what is the purpose of HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
> around ap_get_local_name() and ap_get_remote_name()?

   I see why but I don't agree with its usage.  The header
<netinet/in.h> is required for the sockaddr_in structure being
passed to it.

-- 
|Chris Costello <ch...@calldei.com>
|Design: The activity of preparing for a design review.
`------------------------------------------------------

Re: HAVE_NETINET_IN_H ?

[Brian Havard <br...@kheldar.apana.org.au>]

On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 11:43:11 -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:

>Maybe this is a silly question, but what is the purpose of HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
>around ap_get_local_name() and ap_get_remote_name()?

The idea is that only platforms that have the struct sockaddr_in type will
support these APR functions (they're a bit of a fudge to make the transition
easier anyway, like ap_get_os_*). I was thinking that any platform that had
sockaddr_in would define it in netinet/in.h but I forgot windows defines
everything in winsock.h. I guess it should be replaced by a HAVE_SOCKADDR_IN
type macro. I'm sure autoconf has some way of detecting a struct definition.

-- 
 ______________________________________________________________________________
 |  Brian Havard                 |  "He is not the messiah!                   |
 |  brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au  |  He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------