You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by Dave Koelmeyer <da...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> on 2017/07/23 10:59:20 UTC
Changing default template to Haddock
Hi All,
Apologies if this change has already been made, but if not, what are
folks' thoughts about enabling Haddock as the default template for new
JSPWiki installations? The plain vanilla template is pretty long in the
tooth and certainly doesn't relay a good first impression out of the box.
Cheers,
Dave
--
Dave Koelmeyer
http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87
Re: Changing default template to Haddock
Posted by Dave Koelmeyer <da...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz>.
Great—I've opened an issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-1060
I can prepare a communication to go out in advance advising of any
changes needed to jspwiki-custom.properties. +1 on the existing default
template name change.
Cheers,
Dave
On 23/07/17 23:27, Harry Metske wrote:
> +1
> I am using the haddock template a long time already too.
>
> Regards,
> Harry
>
>
> Op 23 jul. 2017 13:14 schreef "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would be +1 on that. IMHO then version should be switched to 2.11.0? it
>> will most probably imply changes for people with existing default-based
>> templates, they should at least specify in jspwiki-custom.properties that
>> they want the default template. And re-reading the last sentence, maybe we
>> should also rename the default template to clean template or something
>> along those lines?
>>
>>
>> br,
>> jp
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Dave Koelmeyer <
>> dave.koelmeyer@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Apologies if this change has already been made, but if not, what are
>>> folks' thoughts about enabling Haddock as the default template for new
>>> JSPWiki installations? The plain vanilla template is pretty long in the
>>> tooth and certainly doesn't relay a good first impression out of the box.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Koelmeyer
>>> http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
>>> GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87
>>>
>>>
--
Dave Koelmeyer
http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87
The Document Foundation (TDF) member
Re: Changing default template to Haddock
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
+1
I am using the haddock template a long time already too.
Regards,
Harry
Op 23 jul. 2017 13:14 schreef "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I would be +1 on that. IMHO then version should be switched to 2.11.0? it
> will most probably imply changes for people with existing default-based
> templates, they should at least specify in jspwiki-custom.properties that
> they want the default template. And re-reading the last sentence, maybe we
> should also rename the default template to clean template or something
> along those lines?
>
>
> br,
> jp
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Dave Koelmeyer <
> dave.koelmeyer@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Apologies if this change has already been made, but if not, what are
> > folks' thoughts about enabling Haddock as the default template for new
> > JSPWiki installations? The plain vanilla template is pretty long in the
> > tooth and certainly doesn't relay a good first impression out of the box.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave
> >
> > --
> > Dave Koelmeyer
> > http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
> > GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87
> >
> >
>
Re: Changing default template to Haddock
Posted by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I would be +1 on that. IMHO then version should be switched to 2.11.0? it
will most probably imply changes for people with existing default-based
templates, they should at least specify in jspwiki-custom.properties that
they want the default template. And re-reading the last sentence, maybe we
should also rename the default template to clean template or something
along those lines?
br,
jp
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Dave Koelmeyer <
dave.koelmeyer@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Apologies if this change has already been made, but if not, what are
> folks' thoughts about enabling Haddock as the default template for new
> JSPWiki installations? The plain vanilla template is pretty long in the
> tooth and certainly doesn't relay a good first impression out of the box.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
> --
> Dave Koelmeyer
> http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
> GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87
>
>