You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2016/05/01 00:09:11 UTC
geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?
I’ve just committed GERONIMO-6552. I think it’s time to do a 1.9.0 release of geronimo-javamail_1.4. Any objections?
Regards,
Alan
Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?
Posted by Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>.
we have tests
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Do we have own tests? If so, let's go for it.
> If it is used in TomEE and there are TCKs then it did pass the TCK. Otherwise we would have heard about it ;)
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Monday, 2 May 2016, 18:01, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > i worked a while ago on 1.4 and 1.5. If i recall correctly we released
>> 1.4 as an alpha version because no one were able to execute the TCK.
>> From my point of view its ready for a release but i don't know if this
>> requires TCK pass.
>>
>> For 1.5 i worked on the spec part, but thats not finished.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>> What work remains?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Dont recall the exact status but 1.5 work started at some point. Should it
>>> get synch-ed+go out at the same time?
>>>
>>> Le 1 mai 2016 00:17, "David Jencks"
>> <da...@yahoo.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> That would be great!
>>>>
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>> > On Apr 30, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Alan Cabrera
>> <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I’ve just committed GERONIMO-6552. I think it’s time to do a
>> 1.9.0
>>>> > release of geronimo-javamail_1.4. Any objections?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Alan
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
>> @hendrikdev22
>> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>>
--
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Do we have own tests? If so, let's go for it.
If it is used in TomEE and there are TCKs then it did pass the TCK. Otherwise we would have heard about it ;)
txs and LieGrue,
strub
> On Monday, 2 May 2016, 18:01, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > i worked a while ago on 1.4 and 1.5. If i recall correctly we released
> 1.4 as an alpha version because no one were able to execute the TCK.
> From my point of view its ready for a release but i don't know if this
> requires TCK pass.
>
> For 1.5 i worked on the spec part, but thats not finished.
>
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> What work remains?
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Dont recall the exact status but 1.5 work started at some point. Should it
>> get synch-ed+go out at the same time?
>>
>> Le 1 mai 2016 00:17, "David Jencks"
> <da...@yahoo.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>> That would be great!
>>>
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>> > On Apr 30, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Alan Cabrera
> <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I’ve just committed GERONIMO-6552. I think it’s time to do a
> 1.9.0
>>> > release of geronimo-javamail_1.4. Any objections?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Alan
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>
Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?
Posted by Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>.
i worked a while ago on 1.4 and 1.5. If i recall correctly we released
1.4 as an alpha version because no one were able to execute the TCK.
From my point of view its ready for a release but i don't know if this
requires TCK pass.
For 1.5 i worked on the spec part, but thats not finished.
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> What work remains?
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Dont recall the exact status but 1.5 work started at some point. Should it
> get synch-ed+go out at the same time?
>
> Le 1 mai 2016 00:17, "David Jencks" <da...@yahoo.com> a écrit :
>>
>> That would be great!
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>> > On Apr 30, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I’ve just committed GERONIMO-6552. I think it’s time to do a 1.9.0
>> > release of geronimo-javamail_1.4. Any objections?
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Alan
>> >
>>
>
--
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
What work remains?
> On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Dont recall the exact status but 1.5 work started at some point. Should it get synch-ed+go out at the same time?
> Le 1 mai 2016 00:17, "David Jencks" <david_jencks@yahoo.com <ma...@yahoo.com>> a écrit :
> That would be great!
>
> david jencks
>
> > On Apr 30, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Alan Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com <ma...@toolazydogs.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I’ve just committed GERONIMO-6552. I think it’s time to do a 1.9.0 release of geronimo-javamail_1.4. Any objections?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
>
Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1
Dont recall the exact status but 1.5 work started at some point. Should it
get synch-ed+go out at the same time?
Le 1 mai 2016 00:17, "David Jencks" <da...@yahoo.com> a écrit :
> That would be great!
>
> david jencks
>
> > On Apr 30, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> >
> > I’ve just committed GERONIMO-6552. I think it’s time to do a 1.9.0
> release of geronimo-javamail_1.4. Any objections?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
>
>
Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
That would be great!
david jencks
> On Apr 30, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> I’ve just committed GERONIMO-6552. I think it’s time to do a 1.9.0 release of geronimo-javamail_1.4. Any objections?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>