You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Dave Koontz <dk...@mbc.edu> on 2007/10/11 00:14:22 UTC
LashBack URL / BL?
Does anyone use the LashBack URL as an MTA BL block or SA rule? I just
discovered them and they sound intriguing. Any feedback on their
reliability and FP rate would be appreciated. I am a little concerned that
I've never heard of them before..
http://www.lashback.com/support/UnsubscribeBlacklistSupport.aspx
Re: LashBack URL / BL?
Posted by Bill Landry <bi...@inetmsg.com>.
Kris Deugau wrote:
> Mikael Syska wrote:
>> I'm not sure about all the diff black list options ... but I guess it
>> would be rather easy to test it .....
>>
>> header RCVD_IN_LASHBACK eval:check_rbl('LASHBACK','ubl.unsubscore.com')
>> describe RCVD_IN_LASHBACK lashback
>> tflags RCVD_IN_LASHBACK net
>> score RCVD_IN_LASHBACK 0.0
>>
>> Would this be the right text to add to local.cf ... then in a few days
>> I can give some feedback ....
>
> You'd want a small, non-zero score (0.001 is usually good for this type
> of testing) otherwise the test is disabled. <g>
>
> -kgd
Also, I don't know if it's required or not, but all examples I've seen of
"eval:check_rbl" tests, the query host name is terminated with a ".":
header RCVD_IN_LASHBACK eval:check_rbl('LASHBACK','ubl.unsubscore.com.')
Bill
Re: LashBack URL / BL?
Posted by Kris Deugau <kd...@vianet.ca>.
Mikael Syska wrote:
> I'm not sure about all the diff black list options ... but I guess it
> would be rather easy to test it .....
>
> header RCVD_IN_LASHBACK eval:check_rbl('LASHBACK','ubl.unsubscore.com')
> describe RCVD_IN_LASHBACK lashback
> tflags RCVD_IN_LASHBACK net
> score RCVD_IN_LASHBACK 0.0
>
> Would this be the right text to add to local.cf ... then in a few days I
> can give some feedback ....
You'd want a small, non-zero score (0.001 is usually good for this type
of testing) otherwise the test is disabled. <g>
-kgd
Re: LashBack URL / BL?
Posted by Mikael Syska <mi...@syska.dk>.
Hi,
I'm not sure about all the diff black list options ... but I guess it
would be rather easy to test it .....
header RCVD_IN_LASHBACK eval:check_rbl('LASHBACK','ubl.unsubscore.com')
describe RCVD_IN_LASHBACK lashback
tflags RCVD_IN_LASHBACK net
score RCVD_IN_LASHBACK 0.0
Would this be the right text to add to local.cf ... then in a few days I
can give some feedback ....
Dave Koontz wrote:
>
> Does anyone use the LashBack URL as an MTA BL block or SA rule? I just
> discovered them and they sound intriguing. Any feedback on their
> reliability and FP rate would be appreciated. I am a little concerned
> that I’ve never heard of them before….
>
> http://www.lashback.com/support/UnsubscribeBlacklistSupport.aspx
>
// ouT