You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openmeetings.apache.org by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/02 15:34:05 UTC
[VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
Dear OpenMeetings Community,
I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 RC2
RC1 was rejected because of:
- too few VOTE activity
- incomplete README
Main changes are covered in the Readme:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/README Full
Changelog:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/CHANGELOGRelease
artefacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/ Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/ PGP release
keys (signed using C467526E):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/KEYS Vote
will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1
disapprove (and reason why) My vote is +1.
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
Posted by Irina Arkhipets <ir...@gmail.com>.
Hello All,
My vote is +1.
The only minor thing I've just noticed is that we could disable (or hide)
"Files" and "Actions" -> "Share/record screen" menu items in the room of
the Interview type.
But of course this is not critical for the given release :)
Best regards,
Irina.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 RC2
>
> RC1 was rejected because of:
>
> - too few VOTE activity
>
> - incomplete README
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/README Full
> Changelog:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/CHANGELOGRelease
> artefacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/ Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/ PGP release
> keys (signed using C467526E):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/KEYS Vote
> will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1
> disapprove (and reason why) My vote is +1.
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
Posted by Vasiliy Degtyarev <va...@unipro.ru>.
+1
On 03.07.2013 1:51, Artyom Horuzhenko wrote:
> +1
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
02.07.2013 22:51 пользователь "Artyom Horuzhenko" <ak...@gmail.com>
написал:
>
> +1
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
Posted by Artyom Horuzhenko <ak...@gmail.com>.
+1
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
Noone ever supposed red5sip to be a part of Openmeetings due to licensing
though I may want otherwise. Adding generally valid statements like "the
Sun is hot" does not make sense for a user.
This will only make a user wonder why the statement is there. The point
with my comment is "please wait for sip till 3.0 or be ready for surprises
in the SIP field". Being honest is important part of our client strategy.
That makes little sense describing how good Openmeetings part of
integration is till we get the whole thing working well unless you address
a person who can fix things. Our users generally are not ready for such
challanges. Judging from a recent phone call from the client they are not
convinced the whole integration works well. You can also check your comment
in the parallel thread concerning "a big problem with vanishing sound".
02.07.2013 23:20 пользователь "Artyom Horuzhenko" <ak...@gmail.com>
написал:
> Alexei, what kind of misleading do you mean? We can't return sip
> integeration because it had never been removed and Openmeetings sip side
> works well: Openmeetings succesfully allows red5sip to connect, send it
> information about sip rooms etc. Audio and video quality is a red5sip
> issue.
>
>
> 2013/7/2 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>
> > Artyom, IMHO it's a bit late to change. The text you suggest is
> misleading
> > anyway.
> >
> > If we return integration in 2.1.1, someone should answer for its low
> > quality. Let's have an improvement in the integration field in 3.0 if the
> > quality is improved.
> > 02.07.2013 22:54 пользователь "Artyom Horuzhenko" <ak...@gmail.com>
> > написал:
> >
> > > Before changing readme I'd like to know what other people think about
> > this
> > > change in readme.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/7/2 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hello Artyom,
> > > >
> > > > please vote to the dev list
> > > >
> > > > According to your comment: I hope it will be the last RC :))
> > > > You can add this text to the 3.0.0 README
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Artyom Horuzhenko <
> akhor666@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My vote is "+1", but I have some comments about readme. It would be
> > > > better
> > > > > if we will change "Video/audio SIP integration is not a part of
> this
> > > > Apache
> > > > > release." to "Red5sip application is not a part of Openmeetings"
> > > because
> > > > > Openmeetings contains some sip integeration code and we support it,
> > but
> > > > > red5sip had never been a part of Openmeetings. I hope we will be
> able
> > > to
> > > > > rewrite red5sip under Apache license somewhen and include it into
> > > > > Openmeetings.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/7/2 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > > From: Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:34 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
> > > > > > To: dev <de...@openmeetings.apache.org>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings
> > > 2.1.1
> > > > > RC2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RC1 was rejected because of:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - too few VOTE activity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - incomplete README
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> > > > > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/READMEFull
> > > > > > Changelog:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/CHANGELOGRelease
> > > > > > artefacts:
> > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/Tag:
> > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/ PGP
> > > > release
> > > > > > keys (signed using C467526E):
> > > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/KEYSVote
> > > > > > will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ]
> -1
> > > > > > disapprove (and reason why) My vote is +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
Posted by Artyom Horuzhenko <ak...@gmail.com>.
Alexei, what kind of misleading do you mean? We can't return sip
integeration because it had never been removed and Openmeetings sip side
works well: Openmeetings succesfully allows red5sip to connect, send it
information about sip rooms etc. Audio and video quality is a red5sip issue.
2013/7/2 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
> Artyom, IMHO it's a bit late to change. The text you suggest is misleading
> anyway.
>
> If we return integration in 2.1.1, someone should answer for its low
> quality. Let's have an improvement in the integration field in 3.0 if the
> quality is improved.
> 02.07.2013 22:54 пользователь "Artyom Horuzhenko" <ak...@gmail.com>
> написал:
>
> > Before changing readme I'd like to know what other people think about
> this
> > change in readme.
> >
> >
> > 2013/7/2 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hello Artyom,
> > >
> > > please vote to the dev list
> > >
> > > According to your comment: I hope it will be the last RC :))
> > > You can add this text to the 3.0.0 README
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Artyom Horuzhenko <akhor666@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > My vote is "+1", but I have some comments about readme. It would be
> > > better
> > > > if we will change "Video/audio SIP integration is not a part of this
> > > Apache
> > > > release." to "Red5sip application is not a part of Openmeetings"
> > because
> > > > Openmeetings contains some sip integeration code and we support it,
> but
> > > > red5sip had never been a part of Openmeetings. I hope we will be able
> > to
> > > > rewrite red5sip under Apache license somewhen and include it into
> > > > Openmeetings.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/7/2 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > From: Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:34 PM
> > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2
> > > > > To: dev <de...@openmeetings.apache.org>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings
> > 2.1.1
> > > > RC2
> > > > >
> > > > > RC1 was rejected because of:
> > > > >
> > > > > - too few VOTE activity
> > > > >
> > > > > - incomplete README
> > > > >
> > > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> > > > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/READMEFull
> > > > > Changelog:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/CHANGELOGRelease
> > > > > artefacts:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/Tag:
> > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/ PGP
> > > release
> > > > > keys (signed using C467526E):
> > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/KEYSVote
> > > > > will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1
> > > > > disapprove (and reason why) My vote is +1.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > WBR
> > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > WBR
> > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>