You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Hive QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/02 08:47:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-19237) Only use an operatorId once in a plan

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16498944#comment-16498944 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-19237:
--------------------------------



Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12925901/HIVE-19237.09.patch

{color:red}ERROR:{color} -1 due to build exiting with an error

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/11433/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/11433/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-11433/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Tests exited with: Exception: Patch URL https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12925901/HIVE-19237.09.patch was found in seen patch url's cache and a test was probably run already on it. Aborting...
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 12925901 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build

> Only use an operatorId once in a plan
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-19237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19237
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Zoltan Haindrich
>            Assignee: Zoltan Haindrich
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HIVE-19237.01.patch, HIVE-19237.02.patch, HIVE-19237.03.patch, HIVE-19237.04.patch, HIVE-19237.05.patch, HIVE-19237.05.patch, HIVE-19237.06.patch, HIVE-19237.07.patch, HIVE-19237.08.patch, HIVE-19237.08.patch, HIVE-19237.09.patch
>
>
> Column stats autogather plan part is added from a plan compiled by the driver itself; however that driver starts to use operatorIds from 1 ; so it's possible that 2 SEL_1 operators end up in the same plan...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)