You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Gareth Bryan <ga...@fastmail.fm> on 2003/08/08 20:08:43 UTC

Re: Minimum JDK

I was wondering how long it would be before this would come up :)

My vote would definately be for >= 1.4....

James:- are there any limitations on this as far as the seed code is
concerned?

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:33:51 -0400 (EDT), "Aaron Mulder"
<am...@alumni.princeton.edu> said:
> 	Can we assume JDK 1.4?  I would like to, but historically I've 
> seen a lot of resistance to requiring the "latest and greatest".
> 
> Aaron
> 
-- 
  Gareth Bryan
  garethbryan@fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
  http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html