You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to phoenix-dev@avalon.apache.org by Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org> on 2002/12/03 10:49:57 UTC

Re: [Altrmi] a future ?


Peter Donald wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:29, Paul Hammant wrote:
> 
>>Its been pointed out to me that the name 'AltRMI' is a bit daft as its
>>not quite anything (TLA, FLBP, abbr, abstract). DRMI (Distributed RMI)
>>is thought to be better.  Anyway given that I am too close to the woods
>>to see the trees, perhaps others could offer their opinion.
> 
> 
> Or just DMI.

I'd keep the -RMI part since it's quite known. Personally I kinda like 
AltRMI, but also D-RMI or E-RMI (easy RMI) are ok. Just my 2c

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>