You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/12/10 08:44:41 UTC

[GitHub] [flink] Myasuka commented on a change in pull request #10498: [FLINK-14495][docs] Add documentation for memory control of RocksDB state backend

Myasuka commented on a change in pull request #10498: [FLINK-14495][docs] Add documentation for memory control of RocksDB state backend
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10498#discussion_r355905000
 
 

 ##########
 File path: docs/ops/state/large_state_tuning.md
 ##########
 @@ -210,6 +210,28 @@ and not from the JVM. Any memory you assign to RocksDB will have to be accounted
 of the TaskManagers by the same amount. Not doing that may result in YARN/Mesos/etc terminating the JVM processes for
 allocating more memory than configured.
 
+#### Bound total memory usage of RocksDB instance(s) per slot
+
+RocksDB allocates native memory without control of JVM, and might lead the process to exceed total memory budget of the container to get killed in container environment (e.g. Kubernetes).
+From Flink-1.10, we provide a solution to limit total memory usage for RocksDb instance(s) per slot by leveraging RocksDB's mechanism to 
+share [cache](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Block-Cache) and [write buffer manager](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Write-Buffer-Manager) among instance(s).
+Generally speaking, we mainly have three parts of memory usage for RocksDB in Flink scenario: block cache, index & bloom filters and memtables 
+(refer to [memory-usage-in-rocksdb](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Memory-usage-in-RocksDB)).
+The basic idea is to share a `Cache` object with desired capacity among all RocksDB instances, 
+and [cost memory used in memtable to that cache](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Write-Buffer-Manager#cost-memory-used-in-memtable-to-block-cache) via write buffer manager.
+Besides, we also cache index & filters into that cache, then the major use of memory would be well capped.
+There exist two ways to enable this feature:
 
 Review comment:
   Thanks for your suggestion, I will take this description with correctting something not so accurate.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services