You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> on 2010/07/30 00:47:55 UTC
About operation managed by the AdministrativePointInterceptor
Hi,
currently only the Add, Delete and Modify operation are managed by the
AdministrativePointInterceptor, as any operation like move, rename,
moveAndRename are just a combinaison of delete + add.
It would be better to support all of them, but as of today, it would be
too complicated (I mean, it would also take more time than we have).
Of course, this is a choice, but I believe that it does not limit the
administration of the server for such infrequent tasks.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: About operation managed by the AdministrativePointInterceptor
Posted by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently only the Add, Delete and Modify operation are managed by the
> AdministrativePointInterceptor, as any operation like move, rename,
> moveAndRename are just a combinaison of delete + add.
IMO add, delete and modify are sufficient (just like the way we manage
schema with add and delete)
>
> It would be better to support all of them, but as of today, it would be too
> complicated (I mean, it would also take more time than we have).
>
> Of course, this is a choice, but I believe that it does not limit the
> administration of the server for such infrequent tasks.
yeah, exactly
thanks Emmanuel
Kiran Ayyagari
Re: About operation managed by the AdministrativePointInterceptor
Posted by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@apache.org>.
On 7/31/10 11:11 AM, Ersin Er wrote:
> As far as I remember the spec does not allow this.
I would be interested in having any reference that confirm this. I don't
want to waste time to implement those operations, if it's not supported ...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: About operation managed by the AdministrativePointInterceptor
Posted by Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com>.
As far as I remember the spec does not allow this.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:44, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@apache.org>wrote:
> On 7/30/10 7:55 AM, Ersin Er wrote:
>
>> I don't think that an AP can be moved just as another entry.
>>
>
> technically speaking they can, but the effort to make it possible is huge :
> you have to recompute *all* the subentries subtree specifciation under this
> AP...
>
> IMO, just useless.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
--
Ersin ER
Re: About operation managed by the AdministrativePointInterceptor
Posted by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@apache.org>.
On 7/30/10 7:55 AM, Ersin Er wrote:
> I don't think that an AP can be moved just as another entry.
technically speaking they can, but the effort to make it possible is
huge : you have to recompute *all* the subentries subtree specifciation
under this AP...
IMO, just useless.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: About operation managed by the AdministrativePointInterceptor
Posted by Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com>.
I don't think that an AP can be moved just as another entry.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:47, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently only the Add, Delete and Modify operation are managed by the
> AdministrativePointInterceptor, as any operation like move, rename,
> moveAndRename are just a combinaison of delete + add.
>
> It would be better to support all of them, but as of today, it would be too
> complicated (I mean, it would also take more time than we have).
>
> Of course, this is a choice, but I believe that it does not limit the
> administration of the server for such infrequent tasks.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
--
Ersin ER