You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/20 06:08:57 UTC
BeanForm for TP3?
Hi,
since recently someone mentioned the BeanForm component, I've been
reading about it and wondering if there's a version for Tapestry 3,
because I'm still stuck with old JDKs and app servers...
In case there isn't such thing, would a backport be possible? Too much
hard work? I haven't really gotten into all the annotation and
HiveMind stuff and it looks kinda complicated from here...
Regards,
Dario
--
Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
-- W.C. Fields
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: BeanForm for TP3?
Posted by D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good. Keep me and/or the list updated, if you don't mind.
Take care,
Daniel
On 9/25/06, Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Daniel,
>
> I didn't recognize the title of my own post (duh!) and didn't notice
> you had replied to it. I will search the list and try to do the
> backport. Losing automatic validations and other stuff doesn't worry
> me that much; I'm assembling a team of Tapestry newbies for a project
> I'm starting and they're having a hard time climbing the learning
> curve... so I thought maybe BeanForm would speed development, if not
> helped them to understand TP a little more
>
> Regards,
>
> Dario
>
>
> On 9/20/06, D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't have plans to backport it to Tap3, mainly because I don't use
> Tap3
> > and because I don't have any experience using Tap3.
> >
> > There has been some interest from others on this list in doing a
> backport
> > (search the list), so you might want to get together to tackle it. It's
> > Apache2-licensed, so nothing stops you. The only thing is that the next
> > version or two will still be pretty large improvements over previous
> > iterations, so keeping in sync with the original codebase might be an
> issue.
> >
> > I assume you realize that you'd have to eliminate some of the nicer
> features
> > (like automatic validation generation based on annotations) in order to
> > target older JDKs.
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On 9/20/06, Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > since recently someone mentioned the BeanForm component, I've been
> > > reading about it and wondering if there's a version for Tapestry 3,
> > > because I'm still stuck with old JDKs and app servers...
> > >
> > > In case there isn't such thing, would a backport be possible? Too much
> > > hard work? I haven't really gotten into all the annotation and
> > > HiveMind stuff and it looks kinda complicated from here...
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Dario
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
> > > -- W.C. Fields
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
> -- W.C. Fields
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
Re: BeanForm for TP3?
Posted by Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com>.
Not yet, I'm finding it hard to find spare time, and since I'd have to
understand the new Annotation stuff in order to do the backport, I'm
considering adopting TP4 instead.
But I still think backporting BeanForm is a very interesting project,
I haven't quit on it yet.
Regards,
Dario
On 10/4/06, Mark Stang <ms...@pingidentity.com> wrote:
> Did you ever make any progress on this?
>
> thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> Mark J. Stang
> Senior Engineer/Architect
> office: +1 303.468.2900
> mobile: +1 303.507.2833
> Ping Identity
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darío Vasconcelos [mailto:dario.vasconcelos@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 9:34 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: BeanForm for TP3?
>
> Thanks Daniel,
>
> I didn't recognize the title of my own post (duh!) and didn't notice
> you had replied to it. I will search the list and try to do the
> backport. Losing automatic validations and other stuff doesn't worry
> me that much; I'm assembling a team of Tapestry newbies for a project
> I'm starting and they're having a hard time climbing the learning
> curve... so I thought maybe BeanForm would speed development, if not
> helped them to understand TP a little more
>
> Regards,
>
> Dario
>
>
> On 9/20/06, D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't have plans to backport it to Tap3, mainly because I don't use Tap3
> > and because I don't have any experience using Tap3.
> >
> > There has been some interest from others on this list in doing a backport
> > (search the list), so you might want to get together to tackle it. It's
> > Apache2-licensed, so nothing stops you. The only thing is that the next
> > version or two will still be pretty large improvements over previous
> > iterations, so keeping in sync with the original codebase might be an issue.
> >
> > I assume you realize that you'd have to eliminate some of the nicer features
> > (like automatic validation generation based on annotations) in order to
> > target older JDKs.
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On 9/20/06, Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > since recently someone mentioned the BeanForm component, I've been
> > > reading about it and wondering if there's a version for Tapestry 3,
> > > because I'm still stuck with old JDKs and app servers...
> > >
> > > In case there isn't such thing, would a backport be possible? Too much
> > > hard work? I haven't really gotten into all the annotation and
> > > HiveMind stuff and it looks kinda complicated from here...
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Dario
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
> > > -- W.C. Fields
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
> -- W.C. Fields
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
>
>
--
Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
-- W.C. Fields
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
RE: BeanForm for TP3?
Posted by Mark Stang <ms...@pingidentity.com>.
Did you ever make any progress on this?
thanks,
Mark
Mark J. Stang
Senior Engineer/Architect
office: +1 303.468.2900
mobile: +1 303.507.2833
Ping Identity
-----Original Message-----
From: Darío Vasconcelos [mailto:dario.vasconcelos@gmail.com]
Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 9:34 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: BeanForm for TP3?
Thanks Daniel,
I didn't recognize the title of my own post (duh!) and didn't notice
you had replied to it. I will search the list and try to do the
backport. Losing automatic validations and other stuff doesn't worry
me that much; I'm assembling a team of Tapestry newbies for a project
I'm starting and they're having a hard time climbing the learning
curve... so I thought maybe BeanForm would speed development, if not
helped them to understand TP a little more
Regards,
Dario
On 9/20/06, D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have plans to backport it to Tap3, mainly because I don't use Tap3
> and because I don't have any experience using Tap3.
>
> There has been some interest from others on this list in doing a backport
> (search the list), so you might want to get together to tackle it. It's
> Apache2-licensed, so nothing stops you. The only thing is that the next
> version or two will still be pretty large improvements over previous
> iterations, so keeping in sync with the original codebase might be an issue.
>
> I assume you realize that you'd have to eliminate some of the nicer features
> (like automatic validation generation based on annotations) in order to
> target older JDKs.
>
> Take care,
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 9/20/06, Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > since recently someone mentioned the BeanForm component, I've been
> > reading about it and wondering if there's a version for Tapestry 3,
> > because I'm still stuck with old JDKs and app servers...
> >
> > In case there isn't such thing, would a backport be possible? Too much
> > hard work? I haven't really gotten into all the annotation and
> > HiveMind stuff and it looks kinda complicated from here...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dario
> >
> >
> > --
> > Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
> > -- W.C. Fields
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
--
Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
-- W.C. Fields
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: BeanForm for TP3?
Posted by Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Daniel,
I didn't recognize the title of my own post (duh!) and didn't notice
you had replied to it. I will search the list and try to do the
backport. Losing automatic validations and other stuff doesn't worry
me that much; I'm assembling a team of Tapestry newbies for a project
I'm starting and they're having a hard time climbing the learning
curve... so I thought maybe BeanForm would speed development, if not
helped them to understand TP a little more
Regards,
Dario
On 9/20/06, D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have plans to backport it to Tap3, mainly because I don't use Tap3
> and because I don't have any experience using Tap3.
>
> There has been some interest from others on this list in doing a backport
> (search the list), so you might want to get together to tackle it. It's
> Apache2-licensed, so nothing stops you. The only thing is that the next
> version or two will still be pretty large improvements over previous
> iterations, so keeping in sync with the original codebase might be an issue.
>
> I assume you realize that you'd have to eliminate some of the nicer features
> (like automatic validation generation based on annotations) in order to
> target older JDKs.
>
> Take care,
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 9/20/06, Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > since recently someone mentioned the BeanForm component, I've been
> > reading about it and wondering if there's a version for Tapestry 3,
> > because I'm still stuck with old JDKs and app servers...
> >
> > In case there isn't such thing, would a backport be possible? Too much
> > hard work? I haven't really gotten into all the annotation and
> > HiveMind stuff and it looks kinda complicated from here...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dario
> >
> >
> > --
> > Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
> > -- W.C. Fields
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
--
Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
-- W.C. Fields
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: BeanForm for TP3?
Posted by D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com>.
I don't have plans to backport it to Tap3, mainly because I don't use Tap3
and because I don't have any experience using Tap3.
There has been some interest from others on this list in doing a backport
(search the list), so you might want to get together to tackle it. It's
Apache2-licensed, so nothing stops you. The only thing is that the next
version or two will still be pretty large improvements over previous
iterations, so keeping in sync with the original codebase might be an issue.
I assume you realize that you'd have to eliminate some of the nicer features
(like automatic validation generation based on annotations) in order to
target older JDKs.
Take care,
Daniel
On 9/20/06, Darío Vasconcelos <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> since recently someone mentioned the BeanForm component, I've been
> reading about it and wondering if there's a version for Tapestry 3,
> because I'm still stuck with old JDKs and app servers...
>
> In case there isn't such thing, would a backport be possible? Too much
> hard work? I haven't really gotten into all the annotation and
> HiveMind stuff and it looks kinda complicated from here...
>
> Regards,
>
> Dario
>
>
> --
> Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
> -- W.C. Fields
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>