OSGi Enterprise R5 JMX implementation

[David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>]

Hi all,

I've been working on updating the Aries JMX implementation to make it
compliant with the Enterprise R5 spec [1]. It's pretty much finished
at this stage (well, there is one small addition to be made around
attribute notifications, but that's all).
Currently the code is in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/sandbox/jmx-next. It was
originally based on http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/jmx so
at this stage I think it would be good to move it back in there.

Is there anything in particular that I need to do before that can be done?
Also, anyone remember the SVN command to do this that keeps the history?

Cheers,

David

Re: OSGi Enterprise R5 JMX implementation

[David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>]

No worries, Holly. I'm happy to wait a little. Just let me know when
the coast is clear.

Cheers,

David

On 20 April 2012 16:10, Holly Cummins <ho...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19 Apr 2012, at 16:11, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> Currently the code is in
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/sandbox/jmx-next. It was
>> originally based on http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/jmx so
>> at this stage I think it would be good to move it back in there.
>>
>> Is there anything in particular that I need to do before that can be done?
>
>
> Speaking lazily, it would make merging my 1.0-prototype branch back to trunk
> easier if I did it before jmx-next turned back into jmx. I'm nearly there
> with it, except for sorting out the provider import ranges.
>
> (On the other hand, handling concurrent changes is what subversion is for,
> so I feel a bit bad asking you to wait! If you want to cut across now I can
> definitely manage.)
>
> Holly

Re: OSGi Enterprise R5 JMX implementation

[Holly Cummins <ho...@googlemail.com>]

On 19 Apr 2012, at 16:11, David Bosschaert  
<da...@gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

> Currently the code is in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/sandbox/jmx-next. It was
> originally based on http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/jmx so
> at this stage I think it would be good to move it back in there.
>
> Is there anything in particular that I need to do before that can be  
> done?

Speaking lazily, it would make merging my 1.0-prototype branch back to  
trunk easier if I did it before jmx-next turned back into jmx. I'm  
nearly there with it, except for sorting out the provider import ranges.

(On the other hand, handling concurrent changes is what subversion is  
for, so I feel a bit bad asking you to wait! If you want to cut across  
now I can definitely manage.)

Holly