You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Ignite TC Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/09 15:12:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-10794) MVCC: RemoveAll is broken on
unstable topology
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16738326#comment-16738326 ]
Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-10794:
----------------------------------------
{panel:title=--> Run :: All: Possible Blockers|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}
{color:#d04437}ZooKeeper (Discovery) 3{color} [[tests 0 TIMEOUT , Exit Code |https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2635928]]
* GridEventConsumeSelfTest.testStopByCallback (last started)
{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2635932&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]
> MVCC: RemoveAll is broken on unstable topology
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-10794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10794
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mvcc
> Reporter: Andrew Mashenkov
> Assignee: Andrew Mashenkov
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: Hanging, mvcc_stabilization_stage_1, transaction
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> Enlist batch holds key and values in arrays structures. This implies that keys and vals arrays sizes should be equals.
> Also, we have an optimization and do not save 'null' vals for 'remove' operation.
> This invariant can become broken on removeAll operation for 2 entries belonging to partitions in different states (moving and owning). For the first one, it's 'mvcc history' will be added to 'vals' array, but nothing will be added for the second one.
> Reproducer IgniteCacheEntryProcessorNodeJoinTest.testEntryProcessorNodeLeave
> See stacktrace:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture$Batch.add(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:1156)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.addToBatch(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:705)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.processEntry(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:650)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.continueLoop(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:533)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.init(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:362)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.enlistLocal(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:531)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.sendBatch(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:426)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.sendNextBatches(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:173)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.map(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:149)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.mapOnTopology(GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:342)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.init(GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:257)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.updateAsync(GridNearTxLocal.java:2074)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.mvccRemoveAllAsync0(GridNearTxLocal.java:1951)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.removeAllAsync0(GridNearTxLocal.java:1670)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.removeAllAsync(GridNearTxLocal.java:550)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)