You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by yishayw <yi...@hotmail.com> on 2016/07/07 03:59:30 UTC
[FlexJS] Developer Setup
I'd like to optimize my SDK development workflow. Currently I have a folder
which contains the nightly build, and a separate folder which has the latest
develop branch of flex-asjs. My main FlashBuilder project is configured to
use the nightly build as the SDK.
When I make changes to flex-asjs develop, I clean my project from
FlashBuilder, compile from the command line, and use the following (windows)
commands to copy the compiled files:
----
copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs\*.swc
C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs
copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\libs\*.swc
C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\libs
xcopy /E /Y C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
-----
Then I can see the SDK changes in my main project.
Is there a better way to do this? Ideally, I'd like to edit a file from the
SDK in FlashBuilder and have my main project recognize the changes
immediately.
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setup-tp53729.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by yishayw <yi...@hotmail.com>.
It turns out I needed to add the relevant swc files to the framework project
I was tinkering with, not to my test project. The disadvantage of this is
that .actionScriptProperties, which is in git, gets changed.
Here's another video describing first what not to do (add swc files to test
project), then what to actually do (add swc files to framework project, make
changes in the framework project, build, and see results in test project).
http://screencast.com/t/pmjghHzO
So I think this is better than what I described in the beginning of the
thread, but we still need to figure out the .actionScriptProperties thing
(just add to .ignore?).
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setup-tp53729p53856.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by yishayw <yi...@hotmail.com>.
This is what happens when closing projects
http://screencast.com/t/Z4AQ1gyiMVT
I'll try adding missing swcs as external libs and post results.
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setup-tp53729p53835.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 7/9/16, 10:30 PM, "yishayw" <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>This works nicely when all projects are open in FlashBuilder, but I try
>and
>have as few open as possible for performance and simplicity. So it looks
>like I'll be going back to my original flow. Still, it's good to know that
>options exists.
What happens when you close projects? If you are only changing one SWC,
you should be able to only have that one SWC's project open and then
include the other SWCs either by not removing them from the SDK, or adding
them as external SWCs.
-Alex
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by yishayw <yi...@hotmail.com>.
This works nicely when all projects are open in FlashBuilder, but I try and
have as few open as possible for performance and simplicity. So it looks
like I'll be going back to my original flow. Still, it's good to know that
options exists.
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setup-tp53729p53821.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by yishayw <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Looks good on the flash side. I'll try the JS side later.
I made a mini video tutorial using your scheme:
Create a workspace, import projects
http://screencast.com/t/EHOi7gKp7
Add projects
http://screencast.com/t/9ms4qEwTs2nV
Play with SDK and see results
http://screencast.com/t/uDsssfGUEsM
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setup-tp53729p53788.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Because regular Flex support Ant, I think FlexJS should as well, so we
will probably have some Ant support forever, at least to test that Falcon
still works from Ant I will keep current Ant scripts working. Not
everyone is a fan of Maven. If some other committer wants to support some
other build system, that's fine too. I don't see any reason to require a
particular build tool. One concern I currently have is that right now,
only one person knows how to make certain kinds of fixes to the Maven
build so it is important to keep Ant going just for the "bus factor".
Maven will be superior because it eventually be faster, but I don't think
it is fast enough to eliminate using an IDE. So we have to make sure that
Maven output works with IDEs. I'm still not sure about how the
-config.xml file support will respond to changes in the IDEs and
vice-versa.
Maven will be superior because Chris has/will integrate code metrics. I
won't bother with that for Ant. So, people will make their choices, and
if you and Chris are right, more folks will end up using Maven.
-Alex
On 7/7/16, 3:16 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>sorry, if I ask something obvious, maybe I'm a bit lost here, but, you
>talk
>about a "Ant build". So, you still need to run an ant build?
>I was expecting to make the 4 mvn operations to build falcon and asjs
>artifacts only, and then use IntelliJ to create a pom based on some
>pom.xml
>from examples folder.
>
>So Ant, will end to be a second citizen, maybe could be maintained if
>people wants, but, I understand that maven should be the way to go for all
>of us, isn't it?
>
>I expect, someday we could reduce 4 mvn instructions to only one "mvn
>clean
>install" and continue working (maybe that's not today due to the baby just
>born, isn't it?)
>
>Maybe I'm missing something
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>2016-07-07 9:57 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>>
>> well I would like to claim that the JavaScript part is as finished as I
>> can be, currently working on some final quirks with resources and font
>> handling in the Flash versions.
>>
>>
>> I think if we setup the Ant build to produce the output files with the
>> same name and in the same location as the Maven build does, I think
>>nothing
>> would be preventing us from simply doing a "mvn clean install" of any
>> changed artifact and we should be able to continue working in Eclipse
>> without interruption. I would not prefer to go the other way around and
>> change the default Maven naming convention producing the same names as
>>the
>> Ant build, as I think ArtifactId+Version is superior over just
>>ArtifactId.
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Von: carlos.rovira@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von
>> Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 09:44:34
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I thought Maven build was now the preferred way of building FlexJS over
>>ant
>> With Maven all this complicated recipe will be over (thank to god) and
>>will
>> only need to pass maven
>> to build in his local repository and the create a pom based on some of
>>the
>> examples
>> (Maybe this last part is dependent on some last work Chris is making
>>this
>> days, at least I'm waiting anxiously for that and laready build with
>>maven)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-07-07 7:40 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>
>> > In theory, there is a better way. Try the following and report where
>>it
>> > doesn't work and we'll see if we can figure out how to make it work.
>> >
>> > First, run ant in the repo. This should generate all of the JS files.
>> >
>> > There should be Flash Builder project files in the repo in each
>> > frameworks/projects folder and frameworks/js/FlexJS/projects folders.
>> > Create a new workspace, add the nightly as a Flex SDK, import all of
>>the
>> > projects. You will probably have to fix up the projects to use the
>> > nightly SDK.
>> >
>> > Now add/create a test application. The test application should select
>> the
>> > nightly as its SDK. From the Project menu, choose Properties, then
>> choose
>> > Flex Build Path from the left-side list and make sure library path is
>> > shown on the right.
>> >
>> > Expand the SDK entry in the list.
>> > Click on each SWC other than playerglobal.swc and choose Remove to
>>remove
>> > it from the list.
>> > Click on Add Project and add each of the projects it needs.
>> >
>> > At this point, changing an AS file in any project should result in a
>>new
>> > SWF with the changes. However, for me, changes to Core.swc cause FB
>>to
>> > hang and I have to restart FB (sometimes twice) to get back to working
>> > again. That might be a good reason to make SWC changes in a SWC other
>> > than Core.
>> >
>> > To build the JS version, you should be able to run the FlexJS (JS
>>CompC)
>> > on the project with the changes. This should generate a fresh set of
>>JS
>> > files. Double-check to make sure they are going in the correct
>>folder.
>> >
>> > Then, from the Run menu, choose External Tools then External Tools
>> > Configuration. Make a copy of FlexJS (FalconJX Debug Build). In that
>> > copy, in the arguments before the -fb option, add sdk-js-lib=<path to
>> > generated-source folder> for each of the SWCs you need in your app.
>> Then,
>> > when you run that config, it should use the newly generated-source
>> folders.
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> >
>> > On 7/6/16, 8:59 PM, "yishayw" <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >I'd like to optimize my SDK development workflow. Currently I have a
>> > >folder
>> > >which contains the nightly build, and a separate folder which has the
>> > >latest
>> > >develop branch of flex-asjs. My main FlashBuilder project is
>>configured
>> to
>> > >use the nightly build as the SDK.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >When I make changes to flex-asjs develop, I clean my project from
>> > >FlashBuilder, compile from the command line, and use the following
>> > >(windows)
>> > >commands to copy the compiled files:
>> > >
>> > >----
>> > >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs\*.swc
>> > >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs
>> > >
>> > >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\libs\*.swc
>> > >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\libs
>> > >
>> > >xcopy /E /Y
>> C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
>> >
>>>C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
>> > >-----
>> > >
>> > >Then I can see the SDK changes in my main project.
>> > >
>> > >Is there a better way to do this? Ideally, I'd like to edit a file
>>from
>> > >the
>> > >SDK in FlashBuilder and have my main project recognize the changes
>> > >immediately.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >--
>> > >View this message in context:
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Set
>>u
>> > >p-tp53729.html
>> > >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Carlos Rovira
>> Director General
>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> http://www.avant2.es
>>
>>
>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
>>vía y
>> proceda a su destrucción.
>>
>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>>comunicamos
>> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
>> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>>nuestras
>> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
>> necesaria.
>>
>
>
>
>--
>
>Carlos Rovira
>Director General
>M: +34 607 22 60 05
>http://www.codeoscopic.com
>http://www.avant2.es
>
>
>Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>proceda a su destrucción.
>
>De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>comunicamos
>que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
>S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>nuestras
>oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
>necesaria.
AW: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
No you I am talking about the Ant build.
I am realistic enough that I know that Ant won't go away soon. We are now in a state, where we are in a parity state. Users can choose which build they want to use. Alex and the others invested quite some time to make ASJS and Falcon build in Eclipse by checking in the config files. These reference the libraries with their ANT names and not the ones Maven produces. If we were to adjust the Ant build to produce the same files in the same locations, the eclipse settings could be adjusted and then the Maven workflow for ad-hoc fixes should be a lot simpler.
Currently the maven plugin is part of falcon ... I will definitely move this over to become the flex-maven-plugin (currently it's flexJS-maven-plugin). As soon as we have released one version of the two other modules I think we should reference these and only do a new release if we need one. Then I'll also change the build of the externs not to use the flexjs-maven-plugin and hereby resolve the last cycle ... then we'll be down to one simple "mvn clean install".
Chris
________________________________
Von: carlos.rovira@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 12:16:47
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Hi Chris,
sorry, if I ask something obvious, maybe I'm a bit lost here, but, you talk
about a "Ant build". So, you still need to run an ant build?
I was expecting to make the 4 mvn operations to build falcon and asjs
artifacts only, and then use IntelliJ to create a pom based on some pom.xml
from examples folder.
So Ant, will end to be a second citizen, maybe could be maintained if
people wants, but, I understand that maven should be the way to go for all
of us, isn't it?
I expect, someday we could reduce 4 mvn instructions to only one "mvn clean
install" and continue working (maybe that's not today due to the baby just
born, isn't it?)
Maybe I'm missing something
Thanks!
2016-07-07 9:57 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> Hi Carlos,
>
>
> well I would like to claim that the JavaScript part is as finished as I
> can be, currently working on some final quirks with resources and font
> handling in the Flash versions.
>
>
> I think if we setup the Ant build to produce the output files with the
> same name and in the same location as the Maven build does, I think nothing
> would be preventing us from simply doing a "mvn clean install" of any
> changed artifact and we should be able to continue working in Eclipse
> without interruption. I would not prefer to go the other way around and
> change the default Maven naming convention producing the same names as the
> Ant build, as I think ArtifactId+Version is superior over just ArtifactId.
>
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: carlos.rovira@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 09:44:34
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I thought Maven build was now the preferred way of building FlexJS over ant
> With Maven all this complicated recipe will be over (thank to god) and will
> only need to pass maven
> to build in his local repository and the create a pom based on some of the
> examples
> (Maybe this last part is dependent on some last work Chris is making this
> days, at least I'm waiting anxiously for that and laready build with maven)
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> 2016-07-07 7:40 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
> > In theory, there is a better way. Try the following and report where it
> > doesn't work and we'll see if we can figure out how to make it work.
> >
> > First, run ant in the repo. This should generate all of the JS files.
> >
> > There should be Flash Builder project files in the repo in each
> > frameworks/projects folder and frameworks/js/FlexJS/projects folders.
> > Create a new workspace, add the nightly as a Flex SDK, import all of the
> > projects. You will probably have to fix up the projects to use the
> > nightly SDK.
> >
> > Now add/create a test application. The test application should select
> the
> > nightly as its SDK. From the Project menu, choose Properties, then
> choose
> > Flex Build Path from the left-side list and make sure library path is
> > shown on the right.
> >
> > Expand the SDK entry in the list.
> > Click on each SWC other than playerglobal.swc and choose Remove to remove
> > it from the list.
> > Click on Add Project and add each of the projects it needs.
> >
> > At this point, changing an AS file in any project should result in a new
> > SWF with the changes. However, for me, changes to Core.swc cause FB to
> > hang and I have to restart FB (sometimes twice) to get back to working
> > again. That might be a good reason to make SWC changes in a SWC other
> > than Core.
> >
> > To build the JS version, you should be able to run the FlexJS (JS CompC)
> > on the project with the changes. This should generate a fresh set of JS
> > files. Double-check to make sure they are going in the correct folder.
> >
> > Then, from the Run menu, choose External Tools then External Tools
> > Configuration. Make a copy of FlexJS (FalconJX Debug Build). In that
> > copy, in the arguments before the -fb option, add sdk-js-lib=<path to
> > generated-source folder> for each of the SWCs you need in your app.
> Then,
> > when you run that config, it should use the newly generated-source
> folders.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> >
> > On 7/6/16, 8:59 PM, "yishayw" <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I'd like to optimize my SDK development workflow. Currently I have a
> > >folder
> > >which contains the nightly build, and a separate folder which has the
> > >latest
> > >develop branch of flex-asjs. My main FlashBuilder project is configured
> to
> > >use the nightly build as the SDK.
> > >
> > >
> > >When I make changes to flex-asjs develop, I clean my project from
> > >FlashBuilder, compile from the command line, and use the following
> > >(windows)
> > >commands to copy the compiled files:
> > >
> > >----
> > >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs\*.swc
> > >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs
> > >
> > >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\libs\*.swc
> > >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\libs
> > >
> > >xcopy /E /Y
> C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
> > >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
> > >-----
> > >
> > >Then I can see the SDK changes in my main project.
> > >
> > >Is there a better way to do this? Ideally, I'd like to edit a file from
> > >the
> > >SDK in FlashBuilder and have my main project recognize the changes
> > >immediately.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setu
> > >p-tp53729.html
> > >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Chris,
sorry, if I ask something obvious, maybe I'm a bit lost here, but, you talk
about a "Ant build". So, you still need to run an ant build?
I was expecting to make the 4 mvn operations to build falcon and asjs
artifacts only, and then use IntelliJ to create a pom based on some pom.xml
from examples folder.
So Ant, will end to be a second citizen, maybe could be maintained if
people wants, but, I understand that maven should be the way to go for all
of us, isn't it?
I expect, someday we could reduce 4 mvn instructions to only one "mvn clean
install" and continue working (maybe that's not today due to the baby just
born, isn't it?)
Maybe I'm missing something
Thanks!
2016-07-07 9:57 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
> Hi Carlos,
>
>
> well I would like to claim that the JavaScript part is as finished as I
> can be, currently working on some final quirks with resources and font
> handling in the Flash versions.
>
>
> I think if we setup the Ant build to produce the output files with the
> same name and in the same location as the Maven build does, I think nothing
> would be preventing us from simply doing a "mvn clean install" of any
> changed artifact and we should be able to continue working in Eclipse
> without interruption. I would not prefer to go the other way around and
> change the default Maven naming convention producing the same names as the
> Ant build, as I think ArtifactId+Version is superior over just ArtifactId.
>
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: carlos.rovira@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 09:44:34
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I thought Maven build was now the preferred way of building FlexJS over ant
> With Maven all this complicated recipe will be over (thank to god) and will
> only need to pass maven
> to build in his local repository and the create a pom based on some of the
> examples
> (Maybe this last part is dependent on some last work Chris is making this
> days, at least I'm waiting anxiously for that and laready build with maven)
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> 2016-07-07 7:40 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
> > In theory, there is a better way. Try the following and report where it
> > doesn't work and we'll see if we can figure out how to make it work.
> >
> > First, run ant in the repo. This should generate all of the JS files.
> >
> > There should be Flash Builder project files in the repo in each
> > frameworks/projects folder and frameworks/js/FlexJS/projects folders.
> > Create a new workspace, add the nightly as a Flex SDK, import all of the
> > projects. You will probably have to fix up the projects to use the
> > nightly SDK.
> >
> > Now add/create a test application. The test application should select
> the
> > nightly as its SDK. From the Project menu, choose Properties, then
> choose
> > Flex Build Path from the left-side list and make sure library path is
> > shown on the right.
> >
> > Expand the SDK entry in the list.
> > Click on each SWC other than playerglobal.swc and choose Remove to remove
> > it from the list.
> > Click on Add Project and add each of the projects it needs.
> >
> > At this point, changing an AS file in any project should result in a new
> > SWF with the changes. However, for me, changes to Core.swc cause FB to
> > hang and I have to restart FB (sometimes twice) to get back to working
> > again. That might be a good reason to make SWC changes in a SWC other
> > than Core.
> >
> > To build the JS version, you should be able to run the FlexJS (JS CompC)
> > on the project with the changes. This should generate a fresh set of JS
> > files. Double-check to make sure they are going in the correct folder.
> >
> > Then, from the Run menu, choose External Tools then External Tools
> > Configuration. Make a copy of FlexJS (FalconJX Debug Build). In that
> > copy, in the arguments before the -fb option, add sdk-js-lib=<path to
> > generated-source folder> for each of the SWCs you need in your app.
> Then,
> > when you run that config, it should use the newly generated-source
> folders.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> >
> > On 7/6/16, 8:59 PM, "yishayw" <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I'd like to optimize my SDK development workflow. Currently I have a
> > >folder
> > >which contains the nightly build, and a separate folder which has the
> > >latest
> > >develop branch of flex-asjs. My main FlashBuilder project is configured
> to
> > >use the nightly build as the SDK.
> > >
> > >
> > >When I make changes to flex-asjs develop, I clean my project from
> > >FlashBuilder, compile from the command line, and use the following
> > >(windows)
> > >commands to copy the compiled files:
> > >
> > >----
> > >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs\*.swc
> > >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs
> > >
> > >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\libs\*.swc
> > >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\libs
> > >
> > >xcopy /E /Y
> C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
> > >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
> > >-----
> > >
> > >Then I can see the SDK changes in my main project.
> > >
> > >Is there a better way to do this? Ideally, I'd like to edit a file from
> > >the
> > >SDK in FlashBuilder and have my main project recognize the changes
> > >immediately.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setu
> > >p-tp53729.html
> > >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Rovira
> Director General
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.avant2.es
>
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
AW: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Carlos,
well I would like to claim that the JavaScript part is as finished as I can be, currently working on some final quirks with resources and font handling in the Flash versions.
I think if we setup the Ant build to produce the output files with the same name and in the same location as the Maven build does, I think nothing would be preventing us from simply doing a "mvn clean install" of any changed artifact and we should be able to continue working in Eclipse without interruption. I would not prefer to go the other way around and change the default Maven naming convention producing the same names as the Ant build, as I think ArtifactId+Version is superior over just ArtifactId.
Chris
________________________________
Von: carlos.rovira@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 09:44:34
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Hi Alex,
I thought Maven build was now the preferred way of building FlexJS over ant
With Maven all this complicated recipe will be over (thank to god) and will
only need to pass maven
to build in his local repository and the create a pom based on some of the
examples
(Maybe this last part is dependent on some last work Chris is making this
days, at least I'm waiting anxiously for that and laready build with maven)
Thanks
2016-07-07 7:40 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> In theory, there is a better way. Try the following and report where it
> doesn't work and we'll see if we can figure out how to make it work.
>
> First, run ant in the repo. This should generate all of the JS files.
>
> There should be Flash Builder project files in the repo in each
> frameworks/projects folder and frameworks/js/FlexJS/projects folders.
> Create a new workspace, add the nightly as a Flex SDK, import all of the
> projects. You will probably have to fix up the projects to use the
> nightly SDK.
>
> Now add/create a test application. The test application should select the
> nightly as its SDK. From the Project menu, choose Properties, then choose
> Flex Build Path from the left-side list and make sure library path is
> shown on the right.
>
> Expand the SDK entry in the list.
> Click on each SWC other than playerglobal.swc and choose Remove to remove
> it from the list.
> Click on Add Project and add each of the projects it needs.
>
> At this point, changing an AS file in any project should result in a new
> SWF with the changes. However, for me, changes to Core.swc cause FB to
> hang and I have to restart FB (sometimes twice) to get back to working
> again. That might be a good reason to make SWC changes in a SWC other
> than Core.
>
> To build the JS version, you should be able to run the FlexJS (JS CompC)
> on the project with the changes. This should generate a fresh set of JS
> files. Double-check to make sure they are going in the correct folder.
>
> Then, from the Run menu, choose External Tools then External Tools
> Configuration. Make a copy of FlexJS (FalconJX Debug Build). In that
> copy, in the arguments before the -fb option, add sdk-js-lib=<path to
> generated-source folder> for each of the SWCs you need in your app. Then,
> when you run that config, it should use the newly generated-source folders.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
>
> On 7/6/16, 8:59 PM, "yishayw" <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I'd like to optimize my SDK development workflow. Currently I have a
> >folder
> >which contains the nightly build, and a separate folder which has the
> >latest
> >develop branch of flex-asjs. My main FlashBuilder project is configured to
> >use the nightly build as the SDK.
> >
> >
> >When I make changes to flex-asjs develop, I clean my project from
> >FlashBuilder, compile from the command line, and use the following
> >(windows)
> >commands to copy the compiled files:
> >
> >----
> >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs\*.swc
> >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs
> >
> >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\libs\*.swc
> >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\libs
> >
> >xcopy /E /Y C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
> >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
> >-----
> >
> >Then I can see the SDK changes in my main project.
> >
> >Is there a better way to do this? Ideally, I'd like to edit a file from
> >the
> >SDK in FlashBuilder and have my main project recognize the changes
> >immediately.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setu
> >p-tp53729.html
> >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Alex,
I thought Maven build was now the preferred way of building FlexJS over ant
With Maven all this complicated recipe will be over (thank to god) and will
only need to pass maven
to build in his local repository and the create a pom based on some of the
examples
(Maybe this last part is dependent on some last work Chris is making this
days, at least I'm waiting anxiously for that and laready build with maven)
Thanks
2016-07-07 7:40 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> In theory, there is a better way. Try the following and report where it
> doesn't work and we'll see if we can figure out how to make it work.
>
> First, run ant in the repo. This should generate all of the JS files.
>
> There should be Flash Builder project files in the repo in each
> frameworks/projects folder and frameworks/js/FlexJS/projects folders.
> Create a new workspace, add the nightly as a Flex SDK, import all of the
> projects. You will probably have to fix up the projects to use the
> nightly SDK.
>
> Now add/create a test application. The test application should select the
> nightly as its SDK. From the Project menu, choose Properties, then choose
> Flex Build Path from the left-side list and make sure library path is
> shown on the right.
>
> Expand the SDK entry in the list.
> Click on each SWC other than playerglobal.swc and choose Remove to remove
> it from the list.
> Click on Add Project and add each of the projects it needs.
>
> At this point, changing an AS file in any project should result in a new
> SWF with the changes. However, for me, changes to Core.swc cause FB to
> hang and I have to restart FB (sometimes twice) to get back to working
> again. That might be a good reason to make SWC changes in a SWC other
> than Core.
>
> To build the JS version, you should be able to run the FlexJS (JS CompC)
> on the project with the changes. This should generate a fresh set of JS
> files. Double-check to make sure they are going in the correct folder.
>
> Then, from the Run menu, choose External Tools then External Tools
> Configuration. Make a copy of FlexJS (FalconJX Debug Build). In that
> copy, in the arguments before the -fb option, add sdk-js-lib=<path to
> generated-source folder> for each of the SWCs you need in your app. Then,
> when you run that config, it should use the newly generated-source folders.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
>
> On 7/6/16, 8:59 PM, "yishayw" <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I'd like to optimize my SDK development workflow. Currently I have a
> >folder
> >which contains the nightly build, and a separate folder which has the
> >latest
> >develop branch of flex-asjs. My main FlashBuilder project is configured to
> >use the nightly build as the SDK.
> >
> >
> >When I make changes to flex-asjs develop, I clean my project from
> >FlashBuilder, compile from the command line, and use the following
> >(windows)
> >commands to copy the compiled files:
> >
> >----
> >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs\*.swc
> >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs
> >
> >copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\libs\*.swc
> >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\libs
> >
> >xcopy /E /Y C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
> >C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
> >-----
> >
> >Then I can see the SDK changes in my main project.
> >
> >Is there a better way to do this? Ideally, I'd like to edit a file from
> >the
> >SDK in FlashBuilder and have my main project recognize the changes
> >immediately.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setu
> >p-tp53729.html
> >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Re: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
In theory, there is a better way. Try the following and report where it
doesn't work and we'll see if we can figure out how to make it work.
First, run ant in the repo. This should generate all of the JS files.
There should be Flash Builder project files in the repo in each
frameworks/projects folder and frameworks/js/FlexJS/projects folders.
Create a new workspace, add the nightly as a Flex SDK, import all of the
projects. You will probably have to fix up the projects to use the
nightly SDK.
Now add/create a test application. The test application should select the
nightly as its SDK. From the Project menu, choose Properties, then choose
Flex Build Path from the left-side list and make sure library path is
shown on the right.
Expand the SDK entry in the list.
Click on each SWC other than playerglobal.swc and choose Remove to remove
it from the list.
Click on Add Project and add each of the projects it needs.
At this point, changing an AS file in any project should result in a new
SWF with the changes. However, for me, changes to Core.swc cause FB to
hang and I have to restart FB (sometimes twice) to get back to working
again. That might be a good reason to make SWC changes in a SWC other
than Core.
To build the JS version, you should be able to run the FlexJS (JS CompC)
on the project with the changes. This should generate a fresh set of JS
files. Double-check to make sure they are going in the correct folder.
Then, from the Run menu, choose External Tools then External Tools
Configuration. Make a copy of FlexJS (FalconJX Debug Build). In that
copy, in the arguments before the -fb option, add sdk-js-lib=<path to
generated-source folder> for each of the SWCs you need in your app. Then,
when you run that config, it should use the newly generated-source folders.
HTH,
-Alex
On 7/6/16, 8:59 PM, "yishayw" <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I'd like to optimize my SDK development workflow. Currently I have a
>folder
>which contains the nightly build, and a separate folder which has the
>latest
>develop branch of flex-asjs. My main FlashBuilder project is configured to
>use the nightly build as the SDK.
>
>
>When I make changes to flex-asjs develop, I clean my project from
>FlashBuilder, compile from the command line, and use the following
>(windows)
>commands to copy the compiled files:
>
>----
>copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs\*.swc
>C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs
>
>copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\libs\*.swc
>C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\libs
>
>xcopy /E /Y C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
>C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
>-----
>
>Then I can see the SDK changes in my main project.
>
>Is there a better way to do this? Ideally, I'd like to edit a file from
>the
>SDK in FlashBuilder and have my main project recognize the changes
>immediately.
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setu
>p-tp53729.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
AW: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
You could give the Maven build a try. That should ease up some of the workflow :-)
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: yishayw <yi...@hotmail.com>
Datum: 07.07.16 06:41 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [FlexJS] Developer Setup
I'd like to optimize my SDK development workflow. Currently I have a folder
which contains the nightly build, and a separate folder which has the latest
develop branch of flex-asjs. My main FlashBuilder project is configured to
use the nightly build as the SDK.
When I make changes to flex-asjs develop, I clean my project from
FlashBuilder, compile from the command line, and use the following (windows)
commands to copy the compiled files:
----
copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs\*.swc
C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\libs
copy C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\libs\*.swc
C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\libs
xcopy /E /Y C:\dev\flexjs\flex-asjs\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
C:\dev\flexjs_builds\nightly_07\frameworks\js\FlexJS\generated-sources
-----
Then I can see the SDK changes in my main project.
Is there a better way to do this? Ideally, I'd like to edit a file from the
SDK in FlashBuilder and have my main project recognize the changes
immediately.
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Developer-Setup-tp53729.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.