You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com> on 2014/11/17 00:05:17 UTC
[VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Developers, Committers, PMC members,
Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
packaged up a new release candidate.
The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2,
version 1.99.4 is ready.
Please vote by Monday, November 24.
Change log:
https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
The tag to be voted on:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
The KEYS file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
(Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
with my keys)
Keep calm and vote,
Gwen
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
Also, not a blocker for the release IMO. Good find Veena!
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Veena Basavaraj <vb...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Did another round o sanity testing for 1.99.4
>
> Found a issue with docs : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1753
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
> *./Vee*
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, its fairly minor.
> > We'll put it in if we need another release candidate.
> >
> > Thanks for the votes and comments Jarcec, Venkat and Abe :)
> >
> > Gwen
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Agreed. I'll tentatively change the fix version now.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Looking at the description it is a good to have this but given we have
> > >> developer previews, agree it is OK to live with it unless there is
> some
> > >> other change that warrants a respin We do need to change the fix
> > version
> > >> of the bug though if there are no more RCs.
> > >>
> > >> Venkat
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Just to state my perspective, it does not appear to be a blocker.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <abe@cloudera.com
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636
> to
> > >> > > branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is
> > definitely
> > >> a
> > >> > > nice to have for connector developers.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -Abe
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > >> > > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> +1
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Built and ran tests on the sources
> > >> > >> Verified checksums and signatures
> > >> > >> No RAT violations
> > >> > >> Check License, notices ..
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Good work folks.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of
> > other
> > >> > >> preoccupations.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Venkat
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <
> > abe@cloudera.com>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > +1 (non-binding)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > >> > >> > * Ran tests
> > >> > >> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> > >> > >> > * Ran an import job and export job
> > >> > >> > * Ran batch script for import
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <
> > >> > jarcec@apache.org>
> > >> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > > +1
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > >> > >> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license
> > file
> > >> > >> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> > >> > >> > > * Run tests
> > >> > >> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > Jarcec
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <
> > >> gshapira@cloudera.com>
> > >> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> > >> > >> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved.
> Therefore,
> > >> > we’ve
> > >> > >> > > > packaged up a new release candidate.
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of
> Apache
> > >> Sqoop
> > >> > >> 2,
> > >> > >> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready.
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Change log:
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >>
> > https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum
> (*.md5):
> > >> > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > The tag to be voted on:
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > The KEYS file:
> > >> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but
> its
> > >> > signed
> > >> > >> > > > with my keys)
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Keep calm and vote,
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Gwen
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> --
> > >> > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > >> > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > >> entity
> > >> > >> to
> > >> > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > >> confidential,
> > >> > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
> the
> > >> > reader
> > >> > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> > notified
> > >> > >> that
> > >> > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > >> > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> > have
> > >> > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > >> > >> immediately
> > >> > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > entity to
> > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Veena Basavaraj <vb...@cloudera.com>.
Did another round o sanity testing for 1.99.4
Found a issue with docs : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1753
Best,
*./Vee*
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Yeah, its fairly minor.
> We'll put it in if we need another release candidate.
>
> Thanks for the votes and comments Jarcec, Venkat and Abe :)
>
> Gwen
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > Agreed. I'll tentatively change the fix version now.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Looking at the description it is a good to have this but given we have
> >> developer previews, agree it is OK to live with it unless there is some
> >> other change that warrants a respin We do need to change the fix
> version
> >> of the bug though if there are no more RCs.
> >>
> >> Venkat
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Just to state my perspective, it does not appear to be a blocker.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636 to
> >> > > branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is
> definitely
> >> a
> >> > > nice to have for connector developers.
> >> > >
> >> > > -Abe
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> >> > > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> +1
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Built and ran tests on the sources
> >> > >> Verified checksums and signatures
> >> > >> No RAT violations
> >> > >> Check License, notices ..
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Good work folks.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of
> other
> >> > >> preoccupations.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Venkat
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <
> abe@cloudera.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > +1 (non-binding)
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > * Verified checksums and signature files
> >> > >> > * Ran tests
> >> > >> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> >> > >> > * Ran an import job and export job
> >> > >> > * Ran batch script for import
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <
> >> > jarcec@apache.org>
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > +1
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > * Verified checksums and signature files
> >> > >> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license
> file
> >> > >> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> >> > >> > > * Run tests
> >> > >> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Jarcec
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <
> >> gshapira@cloudera.com>
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> >> > >> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore,
> >> > we’ve
> >> > >> > > > packaged up a new release candidate.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache
> >> Sqoop
> >> > >> 2,
> >> > >> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Change log:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >>
> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> >> > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > The tag to be voted on:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > The KEYS file:
> >> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its
> >> > signed
> >> > >> > > > with my keys)
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Keep calm and vote,
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Gwen
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> >> entity
> >> > >> to
> >> > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> >> confidential,
> >> > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> >> > reader
> >> > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> >> > >> that
> >> > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have
> >> > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> > >> immediately
> >> > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity to
> >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>.
Yeah, its fairly minor.
We'll put it in if we need another release candidate.
Thanks for the votes and comments Jarcec, Venkat and Abe :)
Gwen
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Agreed. I'll tentatively change the fix version now.
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Looking at the description it is a good to have this but given we have
>> developer previews, agree it is OK to live with it unless there is some
>> other change that warrants a respin We do need to change the fix version
>> of the bug though if there are no more RCs.
>>
>> Venkat
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Just to state my perspective, it does not appear to be a blocker.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636 to
>> > > branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is definitely
>> a
>> > > nice to have for connector developers.
>> > >
>> > > -Abe
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> > > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> +1
>> > >>
>> > >> Built and ran tests on the sources
>> > >> Verified checksums and signatures
>> > >> No RAT violations
>> > >> Check License, notices ..
>> > >>
>> > >> Good work folks.
>> > >>
>> > >> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of other
>> > >> preoccupations.
>> > >>
>> > >> Venkat
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > * Verified checksums and signature files
>> > >> > * Ran tests
>> > >> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
>> > >> > * Ran an import job and export job
>> > >> > * Ran batch script for import
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <
>> > jarcec@apache.org>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > +1
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > * Verified checksums and signature files
>> > >> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
>> > >> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
>> > >> > > * Run tests
>> > >> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Jarcec
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <
>> gshapira@cloudera.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
>> > >> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore,
>> > we’ve
>> > >> > > > packaged up a new release candidate.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache
>> Sqoop
>> > >> 2,
>> > >> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Change log:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
>> > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > The tag to be voted on:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > The KEYS file:
>> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its
>> > signed
>> > >> > > > with my keys)
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Keep calm and vote,
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Gwen
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>> entity
>> > >> to
>> > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>> confidential,
>> > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>> > reader
>> > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> > >> that
>> > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> > >> immediately
>> > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
Agreed. I'll tentatively change the fix version now.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Looking at the description it is a good to have this but given we have
> developer previews, agree it is OK to live with it unless there is some
> other change that warrants a respin We do need to change the fix version
> of the bug though if there are no more RCs.
>
> Venkat
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just to state my perspective, it does not appear to be a blocker.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636 to
> > > branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is definitely
> a
> > > nice to have for connector developers.
> > >
> > > -Abe
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Built and ran tests on the sources
> > >> Verified checksums and signatures
> > >> No RAT violations
> > >> Check License, notices ..
> > >>
> > >> Good work folks.
> > >>
> > >> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of other
> > >> preoccupations.
> > >>
> > >> Venkat
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1 (non-binding)
> > >> >
> > >> > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > >> > * Ran tests
> > >> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> > >> > * Ran an import job and export job
> > >> > * Ran batch script for import
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <
> > jarcec@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > +1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > >> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
> > >> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> > >> > > * Run tests
> > >> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Jarcec
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <
> gshapira@cloudera.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> > >> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore,
> > we’ve
> > >> > > > packaged up a new release candidate.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache
> Sqoop
> > >> 2,
> > >> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Change log:
> > >> > > >
> > >> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The tag to be voted on:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The KEYS file:
> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its
> > signed
> > >> > > > with my keys)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Keep calm and vote,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Gwen
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > >> to
> > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > >> that
> > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > >> immediately
> > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
Looking at the description it is a good to have this but given we have
developer previews, agree it is OK to live with it unless there is some
other change that warrants a respin We do need to change the fix version
of the bug though if there are no more RCs.
Venkat
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Just to state my perspective, it does not appear to be a blocker.
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636 to
> > branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is definitely a
> > nice to have for connector developers.
> >
> > -Abe
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Built and ran tests on the sources
> >> Verified checksums and signatures
> >> No RAT violations
> >> Check License, notices ..
> >>
> >> Good work folks.
> >>
> >> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of other
> >> preoccupations.
> >>
> >> Venkat
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 (non-binding)
> >> >
> >> > * Verified checksums and signature files
> >> > * Ran tests
> >> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> >> > * Ran an import job and export job
> >> > * Ran batch script for import
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <
> jarcec@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > * Verified checksums and signature files
> >> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
> >> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> >> > > * Run tests
> >> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> >> > >
> >> > > Jarcec
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> >> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore,
> we’ve
> >> > > > packaged up a new release candidate.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop
> >> 2,
> >> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Change log:
> >> > > >
> >> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The tag to be voted on:
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The KEYS file:
> >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> >> > > >
> >> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its
> signed
> >> > > > with my keys)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Keep calm and vote,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Gwen
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> >> to
> >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> >> that
> >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> immediately
> >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
Just to state my perspective, it does not appear to be a blocker.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636 to
> branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is definitely a
> nice to have for connector developers.
>
> -Abe
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Built and ran tests on the sources
>> Verified checksums and signatures
>> No RAT violations
>> Check License, notices ..
>>
>> Good work folks.
>>
>> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of other
>> preoccupations.
>>
>> Venkat
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > * Verified checksums and signature files
>> > * Ran tests
>> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
>> > * Ran an import job and export job
>> > * Ran batch script for import
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > * Verified checksums and signature files
>> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
>> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
>> > > * Run tests
>> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
>> > >
>> > > Jarcec
>> > >
>> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
>> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
>> > > > packaged up a new release candidate.
>> > > >
>> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop
>> 2,
>> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready.
>> > > >
>> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
>> > > >
>> > > > Change log:
>> > > >
>> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
>> > > >
>> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
>> > > >
>> > > > The tag to be voted on:
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
>> > > >
>> > > > The KEYS file:
>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
>> > > >
>> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
>> > > > with my keys)
>> > > >
>> > > > Keep calm and vote,
>> > > >
>> > > > Gwen
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
>> to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636 to
branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is definitely a
nice to have for connector developers.
-Abe
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Built and ran tests on the sources
> Verified checksums and signatures
> No RAT violations
> Check License, notices ..
>
> Good work folks.
>
> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of other
> preoccupations.
>
> Venkat
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > * Ran tests
> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> > * Ran an import job and export job
> > * Ran batch script for import
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> > > * Run tests
> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> > >
> > > Jarcec
> > >
> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
> > > > packaged up a new release candidate.
> > > >
> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2,
> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> > > >
> > > > Change log:
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> > > >
> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted on:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> > > >
> > > > The KEYS file:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
> > > > with my keys)
> > > >
> > > > Keep calm and vote,
> > > >
> > > > Gwen
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
+1
Built and ran tests on the sources
Verified checksums and signatures
No RAT violations
Check License, notices ..
Good work folks.
Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of other
preoccupations.
Venkat
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Verified checksums and signature files
> * Ran tests
> * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> * Ran an import job and export job
> * Ran batch script for import
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
> > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> > * Run tests
> > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> >
> > Jarcec
> >
> > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> > >
> > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
> > > packaged up a new release candidate.
> > >
> > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2,
> > > version 1.99.4 is ready.
> > >
> > > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> > >
> > > Change log:
> > > https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> > >
> > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted on:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> > >
> > > The KEYS file:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> > >
> > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
> > > with my keys)
> > >
> > > Keep calm and vote,
> > >
> > > Gwen
> >
> >
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
* Verified checksums and signature files
* Ran tests
* Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
* Ran an import job and export job
* Ran batch script for import
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1
>
> * Verified checksums and signature files
> * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
> * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> * Run tests
> * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
>
> Jarcec
>
> > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> >
> > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
> > packaged up a new release candidate.
> >
> > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2,
> > version 1.99.4 is ready.
> >
> > Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> >
> > Change log:
> > https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> >
> > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> >
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> >
> > The KEYS file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> >
> > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
> > with my keys)
> >
> > Keep calm and vote,
> >
> > Gwen
>
>
Re: [REQUEST FOR VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>.
This vote is now closed.
The vote passes with:
+1 (3 binding, 1 non-binding):
Jarek Cecho (binding)
Abraham Elmahrek (non-binding)
Venkat Ranganthan (binding)
Arvind Prabhakar (binding)
+0: None
-1 : None
As a result of this vote passing, this release candidate has been promoted
to the Apache Sqoop 1.99.4 release.
Thanks to everyone who tested, reported issues, patches and voted. I’ll
start the process of posting the release.
Gwen
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org> wrote:
> Apologies for the delay. Here is my vote:
>
> +1
>
> * Verified checksums and signature of the source tar-ball
> * Verified tag against source distribution (nits below)
> * Builds correctly (did not run tests)
>
> Some nits:
> * The source distribution contains a bunch of IntelliJ files that should
> not be there
> * The source distribution is missing the following files:
> - sqoop/dist/src/main/bin: sqoop2-server
> - sqoop/dist/src/main/bin: sqoop2-shell
> - sqoop/dist/src/main/bin: sqoop2-tool
> - sqoop/dist/src/main/server/bin: setenv.bat
>
> Thanks for your help in getting this done Gwen!
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sqoop PMC,
> > we’re missing last PMC vote on the ongoing release. Might I request you
> to
> > take a look so that we can push the release forward?
> >
> > Jarcec
> >
> > > On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> > > * Run tests
> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> > >
> > > Jarcec
> > >
> > >> On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> > >>
> > >> Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> > >> A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
> > >> packaged up a new release candidate.
> > >>
> > >> The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2,
> > >> version 1.99.4 is ready.
> > >>
> > >> Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> > >>
> > >> Change log:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> > >>
> > >> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> > >>
> > >> The tag to be voted on:
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> > >>
> > >> The KEYS file:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
> > >> with my keys)
> > >>
> > >> Keep calm and vote,
> > >>
> > >> Gwen
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [REQUEST FOR VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
Apologies for the delay. Here is my vote:
+1
* Verified checksums and signature of the source tar-ball
* Verified tag against source distribution (nits below)
* Builds correctly (did not run tests)
Some nits:
* The source distribution contains a bunch of IntelliJ files that should
not be there
* The source distribution is missing the following files:
- sqoop/dist/src/main/bin: sqoop2-server
- sqoop/dist/src/main/bin: sqoop2-shell
- sqoop/dist/src/main/bin: sqoop2-tool
- sqoop/dist/src/main/server/bin: setenv.bat
Thanks for your help in getting this done Gwen!
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Sqoop PMC,
> we’re missing last PMC vote on the ongoing release. Might I request you to
> take a look so that we can push the release forward?
>
> Jarcec
>
> > On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > * Verified checksums and signature files
> > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
> > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> > * Run tests
> > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
> >
> > Jarcec
> >
> >> On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Developers, Committers, PMC members,
> >>
> >> Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> >> A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
> >> packaged up a new release candidate.
> >>
> >> The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2,
> >> version 1.99.4 is ready.
> >>
> >> Please vote by Monday, November 24.
> >>
> >> Change log:
> >> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> >>
> >> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> >> http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
> >>
> >> The tag to be voted on:
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
> >>
> >> The KEYS file:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
> >>
> >> (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
> >> with my keys)
> >>
> >> Keep calm and vote,
> >>
> >> Gwen
> >
>
>
[REQUEST FOR VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
Hi Sqoop PMC,
we’re missing last PMC vote on the ongoing release. Might I request you to take a look so that we can push the release forward?
Jarcec
> On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> * Verified checksums and signature files
> * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
> * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
> * Run tests
> * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
>
> Jarcec
>
>> On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Developers, Committers, PMC members,
>>
>> Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
>> A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
>> packaged up a new release candidate.
>>
>> The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2,
>> version 1.99.4 is ready.
>>
>> Please vote by Monday, November 24.
>>
>> Change log:
>> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
>>
>> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
>> http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
>>
>> The tag to be voted on:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
>>
>> The KEYS file:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
>>
>> (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
>> with my keys)
>>
>> Keep calm and vote,
>>
>> Gwen
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop 1.99.4 (RC1)
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
+1
* Verified checksums and signature files
* Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file
* Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...)
* Run tests
* Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4
Jarcec
> On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> Developers, Committers, PMC members,
>
> Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly.
> A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve
> packaged up a new release candidate.
>
> The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2,
> version 1.99.4 is ready.
>
> Please vote by Monday, November 24.
>
> Change log:
> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
>
> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5):
> http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1
>
> The KEYS file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS
>
> (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed
> with my keys)
>
> Keep calm and vote,
>
> Gwen