You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@velocity.apache.org by Jude Robinson <do...@gmail.com> on 2009/12/17 21:31:04 UTC
Macros in macros
Hi all - a concise question about VTL performance: referencing macros
from within macros seems to be very expensive - do you know why this
is?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org
Re: Macros in macros
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, macros actually got a lot more expensive (especially in memory)
in 1.5. 1.6.2 resolved most of those issues. :)
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Jude Robinson
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Expensive in cycles or memory? And in what version? Much
>>> optimization has been done, and i've yet to notice trouble in 1.6+ (at
>>> least compared to previous).
>>
>> Sorry, should have stated the version: 1.6.2
>
> <pokes around a bit />
> <sigh />
>
> Scratch that: 1.5
>
> Sorry. Ignore. No problems here.
>
> <trots off to upgrade />
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org
Re: Macros in macros
Posted by Jude Robinson <do...@gmail.com>.
>> Expensive in cycles or memory? And in what version? Much
>> optimization has been done, and i've yet to notice trouble in 1.6+ (at
>> least compared to previous).
>
> Sorry, should have stated the version: 1.6.2
<pokes around a bit />
<sigh />
Scratch that: 1.5
Sorry. Ignore. No problems here.
<trots off to upgrade />
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org
Re: Macros in macros
Posted by Jude Robinson <do...@gmail.com>.
> Expensive in cycles or memory? And in what version? Much
> optimization has been done, and i've yet to notice trouble in 1.6+ (at
> least compared to previous).
Sorry, should have stated the version: 1.6.2
In terms of cycles or memory: cycles *I guess* … I've simply noticed
that when using apache bench on a page consisting of a few calls to a
macro that references other macros - when said references to macros
are replaced with the code contained in those macros the average
response time drops significantly.
Be gentle with me … I'm just a simple clientsider …
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org
Re: Macros in macros
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
Expensive in cycles or memory? And in what version? Much
optimization has been done, and i've yet to notice trouble in 1.6+ (at
least compared to previous).
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Jude Robinson
<do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all - a concise question about VTL performance: referencing macros
> from within macros seems to be very expensive - do you know why this
> is?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org