Re: [POLL] Version Numbers in TLD URIs

[Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>]

Is this a 2.3 thing?

It used to be that you would make the hard reference in the 
web.xml (the location), and then use a soft URI in the pages. 

People often use the location for the URI, but I've always thought 
that was sloppy.

Does the "simplified" configuration mean that deveopers lose 
control over versioning? (a la Microsoft and Explorer)

-Ted.


11/17/2002 10:08:02 PM, David Graham <dg...@hotmail.com> 
wrote:

>Currently Struts defines the TLD URIs containing version numbers 
like this
>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-html-1.1
>
>This means that you must change the uri in every jsp when 
upgrading.  I 
>propose we define the uris like:
>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-html
>
>making it easier for people to upgrade to newer versions.
>
>There's a bug report with more info here:
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13574
>
>My main goal is to get this minor issue solved and move on :-).
>
>Dave
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-dev-
unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-
help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>