You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by giacomo <gi...@apache.org> on 2001/12/22 19:32:48 UTC

Lucene package

Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author line
as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust
the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon.

TIA

Giacomo


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org

Re: Lucene package

Posted by Bernhard Huber <be...@a1.net>.
  hi,
checked in all sources, components, xsp, etc..
removed lucene component, removed old webapp/search/*.xsp files.
hope that's okay

the index for the doc is about 2.74 MB, it takes some minutes to 
generate it,
you will have to generate the index FIRST, see the search/welcome, and then
try search/create..

i didn't thought about pre-generating, yet...

look forward to hear about usage...

bye bernhard



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org

Re: Lucene package

Posted by giacomo <gi...@apache.org>.
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Bernhard Huber wrote:

> hi,
> i fixed the indention, and added $id$, and author line.
> Moreover I split the lucene package into search, and crawler package.
> I implemented a SearchGenerator, and some xsp in the webapp/search
> directory.
>
> I have adapted the cocoon.roles, the documentation/sitemap.xmap, written
> some SearchGenerator documentation.
>
> Then there is searching for the cocoon documentation available at the
> cocoon webapp site.
>
> I will commit this on sunday into the src HEAD branch, if this okay.

Way cool. Go for it. Many thanks.

Giacomo

>
> bye bernhard
>
> giacomo wrote:
>
> >Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author line
> >as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust
> >the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon.
> >
> >TIA
> >
> >Giacomo
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> >For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org

RE: Lucene package

Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
Personally, I am looking forward to see your changes! I was trying out
what is already checked in and it looks promising.

How about adding pre-generated search index to the webapp? :)

Vadim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernhard Huber [mailto:berni_huber@a1.net]
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 4:10 PM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene package
> 
> hi,
> i fixed the indention, and added $id$, and author line.
> Moreover I split the lucene package into search, and crawler package.
> I implemented a SearchGenerator, and some xsp in the webapp/search
> directory.
> 
> I have adapted the cocoon.roles, the documentation/sitemap.xmap,
written
> some SearchGenerator documentation.
> 
> Then there is searching for the cocoon documentation available at the
> cocoon webapp site.
> 
> I will commit this on sunday into the src HEAD branch, if this okay.
> 
> bye bernhard
> 
> giacomo wrote:
> 
> >Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author
line
> >as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust
> >the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon.
> >
> >TIA
> >
> >Giacomo
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> >For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org

Re: Lucene package

Posted by Bernhard Huber <be...@a1.net>.
hi,
i fixed the indention, and added $id$, and author line.
Moreover I split the lucene package into search, and crawler package.
I implemented a SearchGenerator, and some xsp in the webapp/search 
directory.

I have adapted the cocoon.roles, the documentation/sitemap.xmap, written 
some SearchGenerator documentation.

Then there is searching for the cocoon documentation available at the 
cocoon webapp site.

I will commit this on sunday into the src HEAD branch, if this okay.

bye bernhard

giacomo wrote:

>Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author line
>as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust
>the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon.
>
>TIA
>
>Giacomo
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org

RE: @version CVS keyword consistency (was: Re: Lucene package)

Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
> From: giacomo [mailto:giacomo@apache.org]
> 
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> 
> > giacomo wrote:
> >
> > > Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author
line
> > > as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also
adjust
> > > the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon.
> >
> >
> > Well, this was the right time to remind me that I forgot to do it
myself
> > to the code I contributed :)
> >
> > However, I found out that there seems to be no consistency between
us in
> > CVS keywords. Wouldn't it be the case to agree on a consistent way
to
> > insert version tags in the source? Basically someone is using $Id$
> > (including myself) while others seems to use "CVS $Revision$
$Date$". Is
> > there already a standard that I'm missing or should we come up with
one?
> 
> I don't know of a standard, so my proposal is to use $Id$ as well
> because it is mostly complete concerning information inserted into the
> checked in files.

How about both: Id on top of the file, and Revision/Date in Javadoc?

PS I do remember myself asking same question on this list. Nobody had an
opinion at the moment ;)

Vadim

> 
> Giacomo
> 
> >
> > Ciao,
> >
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org

Re: @version CVS keyword consistency (was: Re: Lucene package)

Posted by giacomo <gi...@apache.org>.
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:

> giacomo wrote:
>
> > Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author line
> > as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust
> > the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon.
>
>
> Well, this was the right time to remind me that I forgot to do it myself
> to the code I contributed :)
>
> However, I found out that there seems to be no consistency between us in
> CVS keywords. Wouldn't it be the case to agree on a consistent way to
> insert version tags in the source? Basically someone is using $Id$
> (including myself) while others seems to use "CVS $Revision$ $Date$". Is
> there already a standard that I'm missing or should we come up with one?

I don't know of a standard, so my proposal is to use $Id$ as well
because it is mostly complete concerning information inserted into the
checked in files.

Giacomo

>
> Ciao,
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org

@version CVS keyword consistency (was: Re: Lucene package)

Posted by Gianugo Rabellino <gi...@rabellino.it>.
giacomo wrote:

> Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author line
> as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust
> the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon.


Well, this was the right time to remind me that I forgot to do it myself 
to the code I contributed :)

However, I found out that there seems to be no consistency between us in 
CVS keywords. Wouldn't it be the case to agree on a consistent way to 
insert version tags in the source? Basically someone is using $Id$ 
(including myself) while others seems to use "CVS $Revision$ $Date$". Is 
there already a standard that I'm missing or should we come up with one?

Ciao,

-- 
Gianugo


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org