You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/07/01 22:41:04 UTC
[jira] Updated: (SOLR-280) slightly more efficient SolrDocument
implementation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-280:
-------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-280-SolrDocument2.patch
This is a new implementation where SolrInputDocument *does not* extend SolrDocument. This way each can be optimized for how they are most frequently used.
This adds:
public class SolrInputField
{
final String name;
float boost = 1.0f;
Object value = null;
}
and SolrInputDocument keeps a Map<String,SolrInputField>
This still handles the distinctness bit in SolrInputDocument -- there may be a way to put the SOLR-139 logic elsewhere but i'll tackle that later.
> slightly more efficient SolrDocument implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-280
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-280
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Assignee: Ryan McKinley
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-280-SolrDocument2.patch, SOLR-280-SolrDocument2.patch
>
>
> Following discussion in SOLR-272
> This implementation stores fields as a Map<String,Object> rather then a Map<String,Collection<Object>>. The API changes slightly in that:
> getFieldValue( name ) returns a Collection if there are more then one fields and a Object if there is only one.
> getFirstValue( name ) returns a single value for the field. This is intended to make things easier for client applications.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.