PDF 2.0 spec

[Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>]

Hello Leonard,

Another wish for clarification: inline images. It should be mentioned 
that there must be a line change before and after the "EI". Currently, 
some vendors are just using a space, or even nothing at all. The result 
is that we're using heuristics to decide whether an "EI" is really the 
end of inline image data, or part of inline image data.

See here
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pdfbox/trunk/pdfbox/src/main/java/org/apache/pdfbox/pdfparser/PDFStreamParser.java?view=markup&sortby=date
look for the comment "PDF spec is kinda unclear about this" :-)

Tilman

Am 08.07.2014 21:35, schrieb Leonard Rosenthol:
> No, but it probably should :).
>
> I’ve made a note.
>
> Leonard
>
> On 7/8/14, 2:05 PM, "Martin Schröder" <ma...@oneiros.de> wrote:
>
>> 2014-07-07 23:09 GMT+02:00 Leonard Rosenthol <lr...@adobe.com>:
>>> FWIW: It¹s unclear if such a file (with multiple references from the
>>> Pages
>>> tree) is valid.  There is nothing that prevents it, but it¹s not
>>> necessary
>>> an expected thing.
>> Will this be clarified in PDF 2.0?
>>
>> Best
>>    Martin

Re: PDF 2.0 spec

[Leonard Rosenthol <lr...@adobe.com>]

That’s already been done!   In addition, we added a new optional /L key
for specifying the length of an inline image to also help find the end of
the image (to help avoid the intermediate EI’s).

Personally, I wanted to deprecate Inline Images completely but I lost that
one :(.

Leonard

On 7/8/14, 3:54 PM, "Tilman Hausherr" <TH...@t-online.de> wrote:

>Hello Leonard,
>
>Another wish for clarification: inline images. It should be mentioned
>that there must be a line change before and after the "EI". Currently,
>some vendors are just using a space, or even nothing at all. The result
>is that we're using heuristics to decide whether an "EI" is really the
>end of inline image data, or part of inline image data.
>
>See here
>https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pdfbox/trunk/pdfbox/src/main/java/org/apache
>/pdfbox/pdfparser/PDFStreamParser.java?view=markup&sortby=date
>look for the comment "PDF spec is kinda unclear about this" :-)
>
>Tilman
>
>Am 08.07.2014 21:35, schrieb Leonard Rosenthol:
>> No, but it probably should :).
>>
>> I’ve made a note.
>>
>> Leonard
>>
>> On 7/8/14, 2:05 PM, "Martin Schröder" <ma...@oneiros.de> wrote:
>>
>>> 2014-07-07 23:09 GMT+02:00 Leonard Rosenthol <lr...@adobe.com>:
>>>> FWIW: It¹s unclear if such a file (with multiple references from the
>>>> Pages
>>>> tree) is valid.  There is nothing that prevents it, but it¹s not
>>>> necessary
>>>> an expected thing.
>>> Will this be clarified in PDF 2.0?
>>>
>>> Best
>>>    Martin
>