dependency-reduced-pom in the final jar, or not?

[Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>]

WIthout thinking about it, I've always assumed that, if I tell shade to
replace the final artifact with the shaded output, that somehow the d-r-pom
would become 'the pom' for the benefit of consumers. And it does end up in
the rep. But the pom in the jar's META-INF seems to be the original.

Re: dependency-reduced-pom in the final jar, or not?

[Wayne Fay <wa...@gmail.com>]

> WIthout thinking about it, I've always assumed that, if I tell shade to
> replace the final artifact with the shaded output, that somehow the d-r-pom
> would become 'the pom' for the benefit of consumers. And it does end up in
> the rep. But the pom in the jar's META-INF seems to be the original.

Sounds like a bug to me too! I'd expect to see the d-r-pom in the
artifact as well as the repo.

Wayne

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org