help me!

[andy5920 <an...@gmail.com>]

Hi Subversion Team:

     venture to disturb you, would like to ask, why do not directly generate Subversion Binary Packages, as Tigris.org the DJ Heap, Branko Cibej and Troy Simpson them Which will lead, direct compilation with Apache modules can be attached to it? Because we own the development process may already contain a local Apache, and third-party development mode which can not DJ they just single hook into Apache, so you can go to a lot of trouble. Wish you were able to find time to reply to my right? Thanks very much.

andy
2010.05.22

RE: help me!

["Cooke, Mark" <ma...@siemens.com>]

Hi Andy,

>      venture to disturb you, would like to ask, why do not 
> directly generate Subversion Binary Packages, as Tigris.org 
> the DJ Heap, Branko Čibej and Troy Simpson them Which will 
> lead, direct compilation with Apache modules can be attached 
> to it? Because we own the development process may already 
> contain a local Apache, and third-party development mode 
> which can not DJ they just single hook into Apache, so you 
> can go to a lot of trouble. Wish you were able to find time 
> to reply to my right? Thanks very much.
>  
If you search the mailing list this has been covered quite a lot recently.  Remember that binary packages are not 'part of the package' but are greated by volunteers in their own time.

DJ suffered a failure of his build system that he no longer has the time available to fix.

Further searching of the list may well lead you to the following:

> I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11
> They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net
> You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it.
> 
> The reason I've not announced the release in this (users) list
> is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list (where I
> did announce it) to download and test it first so I know my
> build environment is okey.  As the web page says all test on
> subversion itself is running ok., but the bindings has not been
> tested.
> 
> /David

~ mark c