MNG-3038

[Patrick Schneider <ps...@gmail.com>]

Hi All,

It's been awhile since I've had the availability to do any Maven work, but
I'd like to get back into it.  I have a few open JIRA issues, and I figure
MNG-3038 is as good a place to start as any.

I notice that the first comment states that the issue will likely not be
fixed for 2.0.x, and will be taken into consideration as a use case for the
2.1 artifact resolution spec.

In light of the 2.1.0 release, is this issue valid anymore?  If so, which
development line should I resolve this in?

Thanks,


Patrick

Re: MNG-3038

[Patrick Schneider <ps...@gmail.com>]

Okay, cool.  Like I said...  it's been awhile  :)

Anyway, I'll start working on this today and be in touch.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:15 AM, John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org> wrote:

> Looks like another victim of the version shift. The "2.1" referred to in
> that comment is what we're now referring to as "3.0.x"...aside from that,
> I'm not entirely sure why Joakim said it wasn't fixable until that release.
>
> -john
>
>
> Patrick Schneider wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It's been awhile since I've had the availability to do any Maven work, but
>> I'd like to get back into it.  I have a few open JIRA issues, and I figure
>> MNG-3038 is as good a place to start as any.
>>
>> I notice that the first comment states that the issue will likely not be
>> fixed for 2.0.x, and will be taken into consideration as a use case for
>> the
>> 2.1 artifact resolution spec.
>>
>> In light of the 2.1.0 release, is this issue valid anymore?  If so, which
>> development line should I resolve this in?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>

Re: MNG-3038

[John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org>]

Looks like another victim of the version shift. The "2.1" referred to in 
that comment is what we're now referring to as "3.0.x"...aside from 
that, I'm not entirely sure why Joakim said it wasn't fixable until that 
release.

-john

Patrick Schneider wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> It's been awhile since I've had the availability to do any Maven work, but
> I'd like to get back into it.  I have a few open JIRA issues, and I figure
> MNG-3038 is as good a place to start as any.
> 
> I notice that the first comment states that the issue will likely not be
> fixed for 2.0.x, and will be taken into consideration as a use case for the
> 2.1 artifact resolution spec.
> 
> In light of the 2.1.0 release, is this issue valid anymore?  If so, which
> development line should I resolve this in?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Patrick
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org