You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@marmotta.apache.org by "Andy Seaborne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/03/28 09:53:14 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (MARMOTTA-177) SPARQL benchmark

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13616143#comment-13616143 ] 

Andy Seaborne commented on MARMOTTA-177:
----------------------------------------

Slight caution about LUBM - it isn't considered to be very informative.  The queries are just BGPs and the data not very connected.

See also:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sparql-query-bm/

                
> SPARQL benchmark
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: MARMOTTA-177
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-177
>             Project: Marmotta
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Triple Store
>    Affects Versions: 3.0-incubating
>            Reporter: Jakob Frank
>            Assignee: Sergio Fernández
>              Labels: benchmark
>
> (copied from https://code.google.com/p/lmf/issues/detail?id=21)
> As soon as the new SPARQL engine is finished, we must evaluate its performance.
> Some benchmarks that we could use:
>  * http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/
>  * http://swat.cse.lehigh.edu/projects/lubm/
>  * http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~mschmidt/docs/sp2b.pdf

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira