Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0 - (Yes Again :->)

[Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>]

+1 (binding, IPMC)

Great job everyone on the last minute cleanup stuff.

Dan


On Wed February 17 2010 2:03:03 pm Richard Hirsch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have posted our candidate for the first Apache release developed
> within the ESME podling.
> 
> The candidate can be found at
> 
>  http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erhirsc
> h/esme/>
> 
> See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release
> candidate is a tar archive of the sources in
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incu
> bating/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1.
> 0-incubating>
> 
> The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0-
> src.tar.gz release package is
> 
> 8E 43 0D DF F8 FE 15 9B  22 47 C2 C0 CC 30 21 2C
> 
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if
> a majority of at least three +1  ESME PPMC votes is reached. Assuming
> the vote passes, I will ask the Incubator PMC to approve the release.
> 
>   [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating
>   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Here's my +1.
> 
> Since the last release attempt, the following changes have been made
> * Updated README to indicate that ESME currently just supports JDK 1.6
> * Removed license reference from the README
> * Removed GPL-licensed and other unused dependencies from pom.xml.  (Thanks
> Ethan)
>   Perform "mvn site" to see the current dependencies. The only dependencies
>   only license information are the com.twitter.* jars and I was unabled to
> find
>   licensing info. Although newer versions in github are licensed with
> Apache
> 
>   License
> * Pom.xml no longer refers to lift snapshot but to the "1.1-M8" version
> * Changed version in pom.xml to
> <version>apache-esme-1.0-incubating</version>
> * removed svn files from release
> * directory created by release is no longer called "trunk"
> * Checked SHA signature on signed release but this should be a diff between
> SHA1
>   and SHA512
> 
> 
> Dick Hirsch

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog