You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by Leigh Dodds <ld...@ingenta.com> on 2001/06/28 14:19:48 UTC
Stability: Cocoon 1 vs Cocoon 2
Hi,
What recommendations would people give to someone looking to
start a new Cocoon project. Presumably Cocoon 1 is still the
stabler platform at this stage?
Has anyone gone through migrating a project from C1 to C2, and
if so what problems/difficulties did you encounter? Was it an
easy transition.
Any comments greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
L.
--
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
AW: Stability: Cocoon 1 vs Cocoon 2
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@sundn.de>.
> Eduardo Yánez wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Cocoon 1.8.2 is a pretty stable version but its foundation is
> DOM, so if you
> want to develop a site where the responses can be big the site
> answers will
> be slow and the memory requirements can be big also.
>
> Cocoon 2 is in alpha version yet (almost a beta), but its
> foundation is SAX,
> it is faster (very much faster!) and can handle very large responses with
> low memory requirements. It manages new technologies like SVG so you can
> forget about doing images for site´s menus (cocoon 2 make them for you!).
>
Cocoon 2 is beta since some weeks. If you wish to test C2, I would suggest
to use the beta 1 which can be downloaded as a distribution.
Carsten
Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated
================================================================
Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn
www.sundn.de mailto: cziegeler@sundn.de
================================================================
> Cocoon 2 is more dificult to learn, because it has new concepts (they were
> necesary) that makes it really powerfull. The sitemap and actions for me
> were issues that makes hard the transition.
>
> The Cocoon 1.8.x development is slowed down (if not, it is
> stoped), Cocoon2
> is raising.
>
> Regards,
> Eduardo Yánez.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@ingenta.com]
> Sent: Jueves, 28 de Junio de 2001 08:20 a.m.
> To: Cocoon-Users
> Subject: Stability: Cocoon 1 vs Cocoon 2
>
>
> Hi,
>
> What recommendations would people give to someone looking to
> start a new Cocoon project. Presumably Cocoon 1 is still the
> stabler platform at this stage?
>
> Has anyone gone through migrating a project from C1 to C2, and
> if so what problems/difficulties did you encounter? Was it an
> easy transition.
>
> Any comments greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> L.
>
>
> --
> Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
> http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate"
> http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
RE: Stability: Cocoon 1 vs Cocoon 2
Posted by Leigh Dodds <ld...@ingenta.com>.
So I think I'd say that a fair assessment is that anyone looking
to get to grips with the Cocoon framework would do well to
start with C1 (its easier to started), but would do
well to switch to C2 due its better speed, but not until the development
has progressed much further.
Anyone disagree?
L.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo Yánez [mailto:eyanez@eversystems.com]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 15:25
> To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Stability: Cocoon 1 vs Cocoon 2
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Cocoon 1.8.2 is a pretty stable version but its foundation is
> DOM, so if you
> want to develop a site where the responses can be big the site
> answers will
> be slow and the memory requirements can be big also.
>
> Cocoon 2 is in alpha version yet (almost a beta), but its
> foundation is SAX,
> it is faster (very much faster!) and can handle very large responses with
> low memory requirements. It manages new technologies like SVG so you can
> forget about doing images for sites menus (cocoon 2 make them for you!).
>
> Cocoon 2 is more dificult to learn, because it has new concepts (they were
> necesary) that makes it really powerfull. The sitemap and actions for me
> were issues that makes hard the transition.
>
> The Cocoon 1.8.x development is slowed down (if not, it is
> stoped), Cocoon2
> is raising.
>
> Regards,
> Eduardo Ynez.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@ingenta.com]
> Sent: Jueves, 28 de Junio de 2001 08:20 a.m.
> To: Cocoon-Users
> Subject: Stability: Cocoon 1 vs Cocoon 2
>
>
> Hi,
>
> What recommendations would people give to someone looking to
> start a new Cocoon project. Presumably Cocoon 1 is still the
> stabler platform at this stage?
>
> Has anyone gone through migrating a project from C1 to C2, and
> if so what problems/difficulties did you encounter? Was it an
> easy transition.
>
> Any comments greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> L.
>
>
> --
> Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
> http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate"
> http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
RE: Stability: Cocoon 1 vs Cocoon 2
Posted by Eduardo Yánez <ey...@eversystems.com>.
Hi!
Cocoon 1.8.2 is a pretty stable version but its foundation is DOM, so if you
want to develop a site where the responses can be big the site answers will
be slow and the memory requirements can be big also.
Cocoon 2 is in alpha version yet (almost a beta), but its foundation is SAX,
it is faster (very much faster!) and can handle very large responses with
low memory requirements. It manages new technologies like SVG so you can
forget about doing images for site´s menus (cocoon 2 make them for you!).
Cocoon 2 is more dificult to learn, because it has new concepts (they were
necesary) that makes it really powerfull. The sitemap and actions for me
were issues that makes hard the transition.
The Cocoon 1.8.x development is slowed down (if not, it is stoped), Cocoon2
is raising.
Regards,
Eduardo Yánez.
-----Original Message-----
From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@ingenta.com]
Sent: Jueves, 28 de Junio de 2001 08:20 a.m.
To: Cocoon-Users
Subject: Stability: Cocoon 1 vs Cocoon 2
Hi,
What recommendations would people give to someone looking to
start a new Cocoon project. Presumably Cocoon 1 is still the
stabler platform at this stage?
Has anyone gone through migrating a project from C1 to C2, and
if so what problems/difficulties did you encounter? Was it an
easy transition.
Any comments greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
L.
--
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>