You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Josh Elser (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/09/26 20:34:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23082) Backport low-latency snapshot
tracking for space quotas to 2.x
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16938949#comment-16938949 ]
Josh Elser commented on HBASE-23082:
------------------------------------
.002 has a minor fix to rebase on top of HBASE-22012 I just pushed :)
> Backport low-latency snapshot tracking for space quotas to 2.x
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-23082
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23082
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Quotas
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.3.0, 2.1.7, 2.2.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-23082.001.patch, HBASE-23082.002.patch
>
>
> Some rebase'ing at $dayjob found that HBASE-18133 and HBASE-18135 never made it to any branch-2's.
> There's no good reason that I can think of as to why we shouldn't backport these (will make quotas and snapshots much more accurate). As memory serves me, they just were landing when we were branching for early 2.0.0 releases.
> Let's get backports for HBASE-18133, HBASE-18135, and HBASE-20531 (and implicitly HBASE-20439 and HBASE-20440)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)