You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Jeffrey Zhong (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/01/16 23:45:22 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10366) 0.94 filterRow() may be skipped in
0.96(or onwards) code
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-10366:
----------------------------------
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> 0.94 filterRow() may be skipped in 0.96(or onwards) code
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10366
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10366
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Filters
> Reporter: Jeffrey Zhong
> Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.2
>
> Attachments: hbase-10366.patch
>
>
> HBASE-6429 combines both filterRow & filterRow(List<KeyValue> kvs) functions in Filter.
> While 0.94 code or older, it may not implement hasFilterRow as HBase-6429 expected because hasFilterRow only returns true when filterRow(List<KeyValue> kvs) is overridden not the filterRow(). Therefore, the filterRow() will be skipped.
> Since we don't ask 0.94 users to update their existing filter code, the issue will cause scan returns unexpected keyvalues and break the backward compatibility.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)