You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Dmitry Blotsky <db...@microsoft.com> on 2016/01/20 10:42:03 UTC
[DISCUSS] Node versions on Travis and Appveyor
Hey folks,
Richard and I came across a discrepancy today where some cordova-lib tests were failing on a local machine but not on Travis or Appveyor, and we figured it was likely due to different Node versions (0.12 vs. 5.0).
Are there any objections to expanding our coverage on Travis and Appveyor to run on both Node 0.12 and 5.0?
Kindly,
Dmitry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Node versions on Travis and Appveyor
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
I would recommend testing the latest 4 and the latest 5. Testing 0.10 and
0.12 would also be nice.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Jesse <pu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to expanding coverage, but we should stick to stable versions as Carlos
> notes.
>
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > What about node 4.0? That's the LTS (i.e. stable) version
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:42 AM Dmitry Blotsky <db...@microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > Richard and I came across a discrepancy today where some cordova-lib
> > tests
> > > were failing on a local machine but not on Travis or Appveyor, and we
> > > figured it was likely due to different Node versions (0.12 vs. 5.0).
> > >
> > > Are there any objections to expanding our coverage on Travis and
> Appveyor
> > > to run on both Node 0.12 and 5.0?
> > >
> > > Kindly,
> > > Dmitry
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Node versions on Travis and Appveyor
Posted by Jesse <pu...@gmail.com>.
+1 to expanding coverage, but we should stick to stable versions as Carlos
notes.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> What about node 4.0? That's the LTS (i.e. stable) version
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:42 AM Dmitry Blotsky <db...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Richard and I came across a discrepancy today where some cordova-lib
> tests
> > were failing on a local machine but not on Travis or Appveyor, and we
> > figured it was likely due to different Node versions (0.12 vs. 5.0).
> >
> > Are there any objections to expanding our coverage on Travis and Appveyor
> > to run on both Node 0.12 and 5.0?
> >
> > Kindly,
> > Dmitry
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Node versions on Travis and Appveyor
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
What about node 4.0? That's the LTS (i.e. stable) version
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:42 AM Dmitry Blotsky <db...@microsoft.com>
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Richard and I came across a discrepancy today where some cordova-lib tests
> were failing on a local machine but not on Travis or Appveyor, and we
> figured it was likely due to different Node versions (0.12 vs. 5.0).
>
> Are there any objections to expanding our coverage on Travis and Appveyor
> to run on both Node 0.12 and 5.0?
>
> Kindly,
> Dmitry
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
>
>