You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> on 2019/01/23 08:29:09 UTC
Should we deprecate camel-chronicle ?
While trying to fix the OSGi features, I found out that the Chronicle
Engine has been moved to closed source:
https://github.com/OpenHFT/Chronicle-Engine
It looks like the plan is not to maintain the open source engine. Does
that mean we should deprecate the camel-chronicle component ? Or maybe we
can reach to them and ask if they intend to maintain an ASL versioned
client, without the server bits, as I don't think we use the server part.
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Should we deprecate camel-chronicle ?
Posted by Andrea Cosentino <an...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Created JIRA for this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-13105
--
Andrea Cosentino
----------------------------------
Apache Camel PMC Chair
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix PMC Member
Email: ancosen1985@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019, 10:12:23 AM GMT+1, Luca Burgazzoli <lb...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think we can deprecate it, there were some plan long time ago to
work on a better integration but chronicle engine has left a little
behind and now closed source so I'm +1 to deprecate and remove it. We
can work on a chronicle queue component only later on
---
Luca Burgazzoli
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:08 AM Andrea Cosentino
<an...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> This is really a good question.
>
> I think Luca Burgazzoli is in touch with them a bit.
>
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> ----------------------------------
> Apache Camel PMC Chair
> Apache Karaf Committer
> Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> Email: ancosen1985@yahoo.com
> Twitter: @oscerd2
> Github: oscerd
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2019, 9:29:22 AM GMT+1, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> While trying to fix the OSGi features, I found out that the Chronicle
> Engine has been moved to closed source:
> https://github.com/OpenHFT/Chronicle-Engine
> It looks like the plan is not to maintain the open source engine. Does
> that mean we should deprecate the camel-chronicle component ? Or maybe we
> can reach to them and ask if they intend to maintain an ASL versioned
> client, without the server bits, as I don't think we use the server part.
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
Re: Should we deprecate camel-chronicle ?
Posted by Luca Burgazzoli <lb...@gmail.com>.
I think we can deprecate it, there were some plan long time ago to
work on a better integration but chronicle engine has left a little
behind and now closed source so I'm +1 to deprecate and remove it. We
can work on a chronicle queue component only later on
---
Luca Burgazzoli
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:08 AM Andrea Cosentino
<an...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> This is really a good question.
>
> I think Luca Burgazzoli is in touch with them a bit.
>
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> ----------------------------------
> Apache Camel PMC Chair
> Apache Karaf Committer
> Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> Email: ancosen1985@yahoo.com
> Twitter: @oscerd2
> Github: oscerd
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2019, 9:29:22 AM GMT+1, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> While trying to fix the OSGi features, I found out that the Chronicle
> Engine has been moved to closed source:
> https://github.com/OpenHFT/Chronicle-Engine
> It looks like the plan is not to maintain the open source engine. Does
> that mean we should deprecate the camel-chronicle component ? Or maybe we
> can reach to them and ask if they intend to maintain an ASL versioned
> client, without the server bits, as I don't think we use the server part.
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
Re: Should we deprecate camel-chronicle ?
Posted by Andrea Cosentino <an...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
This is really a good question.
I think Luca Burgazzoli is in touch with them a bit.
--
Andrea Cosentino
----------------------------------
Apache Camel PMC Chair
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix PMC Member
Email: ancosen1985@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019, 9:29:22 AM GMT+1, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
While trying to fix the OSGi features, I found out that the Chronicle
Engine has been moved to closed source:
https://github.com/OpenHFT/Chronicle-Engine
It looks like the plan is not to maintain the open source engine. Does
that mean we should deprecate the camel-chronicle component ? Or maybe we
can reach to them and ask if they intend to maintain an ASL versioned
client, without the server bits, as I don't think we use the server part.
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Should we deprecate camel-chronicle ?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1 to deprecate on 2.x, and remove on 3.0
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 AM Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> While trying to fix the OSGi features, I found out that the Chronicle
> Engine has been moved to closed source:
> https://github.com/OpenHFT/Chronicle-Engine
> It looks like the plan is not to maintain the open source engine. Does
> that mean we should deprecate the camel-chronicle component ? Or maybe we
> can reach to them and ask if they intend to maintain an ASL versioned
> client, without the server bits, as I don't think we use the server part.
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2