You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by jcarreira <jc...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/01 21:01:11 UTC
JMS to JMS Bridge: Any Topic -> Queue Bridges?
Is there any way to bridge from a topic on a remote machine to a local Queue?
(other than doing it by hand, of course)
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge%3A-Any-Topic--%3E-Queue-Bridges--tf2035576.html#a5600959
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: JMS to JMS Bridge: Any Topic -> Queue Bridges?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/2/06, jcarreira <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok... any chance for an update to the XSD?
Its deployed as part of the snapshorts
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/activemq-core/4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT/activemq-core-4.1-incubator-20060801.170356-4.xsd
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: JMS to JMS Bridge: Any Topic -> Queue Bridges?
Posted by jcarreira <jc...@gmail.com>.
Ok... any chance for an update to the XSD?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge%3A-Any-Topic--%3E-Queue-Bridges--tf2035576.html#a5617927
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: JMS to JMS Bridge: Any Topic -> Queue Bridges?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/2/06, jcarreira <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't really understand the notation for wildcards here... can you explain
> what the ">" and "*" mean in those examples?
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/wildcards.html
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: JMS to JMS Bridge: Any Topic -> Queue Bridges?
Posted by jcarreira <jc...@gmail.com>.
Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> On 8/2/06, jcarreira <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The virtual destination sounds interesting. If I have several boxes in a
>> cluster, each mapping the virtual topic to the physical queue, will I end
>> up
>> with duplicate messages in the queue?
>>
>
> Yes. You have to make sure that the messages sent to the
> 'Consumer.*.VirtualTopic.>' destination are not forwarded. This can
> be done by configuring the network connector something like:
>
> <networkConnectors>
> <networkConnector uri="static://(tcp://localhost:61617)">
> <excludedDestinations>
> <queue physicalName="Consumer.*.VirtualTopic.>"/>
> </excludedDestinations>
> </networkConnector>
> </networkConnectors>
>
> I've updated
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Virtual+Destinations
> to include this information.
>
I don't really understand the notation for wildcards here... can you explain
what the ">" and "*" mean in those examples? What if I wanted to map
VirtualTopic.> to a queue named just the part after the ".", so, for
example,
VirtualTopic.Foo -> Foo
where "Foo" is the name of the Queue?
Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
>> Also, the configuration shown on the virtual destination page seems out
>> of
>> date... at least, the destinationInterceptors element doesn't show up in
>> the
>> XSD I've got from a few days ago. Is there another way to do this, or is
>> the
>> XSD out of date?
>
> Chances are it's out of date.
>
>
Any chance of getting an updated XSD? I'm using XML namespaces, so I kind of
need an up-to-date XSD to work...
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge%3A-Any-Topic--%3E-Queue-Bridges--tf2035576.html#a5615098
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: JMS to JMS Bridge: Any Topic -> Queue Bridges?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
On 8/2/06, jcarreira <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The virtual destination sounds interesting. If I have several boxes in a
> cluster, each mapping the virtual topic to the physical queue, will I end up
> with duplicate messages in the queue?
>
Yes. You have to make sure that the messages sent to the
'Consumer.*.VirtualTopic.>' destination are not forwarded. This can
be done by configuring the network connector something like:
<networkConnectors>
<networkConnector uri="static://(tcp://localhost:61617)">
<excludedDestinations>
<queue physicalName="Consumer.*.VirtualTopic.>"/>
</excludedDestinations>
</networkConnector>
</networkConnectors>
I've updated http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Virtual+Destinations
to include this information.
> Also, the configuration shown on the virtual destination page seems out of
> date... at least, the destinationInterceptors element doesn't show up in the
> XSD I've got from a few days ago. Is there another way to do this, or is the
> XSD out of date?
Chances are it's out of date.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge%3A-Any-Topic--%3E-Queue-Bridges--tf2035576.html#a5614120
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: JMS to JMS Bridge: Any Topic -> Queue Bridges?
Posted by jcarreira <jc...@gmail.com>.
The virtual destination sounds interesting. If I have several boxes in a
cluster, each mapping the virtual topic to the physical queue, will I end up
with duplicate messages in the queue?
Also, the configuration shown on the virtual destination page seems out of
date... at least, the destinationInterceptors element doesn't show up in the
XSD I've got from a few days ago. Is there another way to do this, or is the
XSD out of date?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge%3A-Any-Topic--%3E-Queue-Bridges--tf2035576.html#a5614120
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: JMS to JMS Bridge: Any Topic -> Queue Bridges?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Looks like you sould look into networks + virtual topics, see:
http://activemq.com/site/virtual-destinations.html
http://activemq.com/site/networks-of-brokers.html
On 8/1/06, jcarreira <jcarreira@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>
> Is there any way to bridge from a topic on a remote machine to a local
> Queue?
> (other than doing it by hand, of course)
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge%3A-Any-Topic--%3E-Queue-Bridges--tf2035576.html#a5600959
>
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com