[PROPOSAL] Changing EJBModuleConfiguration's package and MBean name

[Jacek Laskowski <ja...@hp.com>]

djencks@apache.org wrote:

> djencks     2003/12/28 12:13:06
> 
>   Modified:    modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/security
>                         EJBModuleConfiguration.java SecurityRealm.java
>                         SecurityService.java WebModuleConfiguration.java
>   Log:
>   Introduce some constants for strings
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.4       +3 -1      incubator-geronimo/modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/security/EJBModuleConfiguration.java
>   
>   Index: EJBModuleConfiguration.java
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: /home/cvs/incubator-geronimo/modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/security/EJBModuleConfiguration.java,v
>   retrieving revision 1.3
>   retrieving revision 1.4
>   diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
>   --- EJBModuleConfiguration.java	28 Dec 2003 19:34:05 -0000	1.3
>   +++ EJBModuleConfiguration.java	28 Dec 2003 20:13:06 -0000	1.4
>   @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
>     */
>    public class EJBModuleConfiguration extends AbstractModuleConfiguration {
>    
>   +    public static final String BASE_OBJECT_NAME = "geronimo.security:type=EJBModuleConfiguration";
>   +
>        public EJBModuleConfiguration(String contextId, EjbJar ejbJar) throws GeronimoSecurityException {
>            super(contextId);
>            configure(ejbJar);

Hi,

Is it only me who thinks the class shall change its place or name? I'm 
rather up for moving the class to Geronimo's EJB module package - 
org.apache.geronimo.ejb. It's pretty generic to any EJB implementation, 
thus it's not appropriate for Nova.

Also, I don't like the MBean's name. I'd rather see it as 
"geronimo.ejb:type=EJBModuleConfiguration".

Regardless of what it's going to happen with the class and its MBean 
name, my doubts have been reported :-)

Jacek