Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

[Simon Kitching <sk...@apache.org>]

On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 22:20 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote: 
> hi simon
> 
> my main development machine blew up last week and i'm still struggling 
> to get up and running on a secondary one.
> 
> i haven't had a chance to look at the code yet (and it might be a fair 
> while before i do) but i'd like to suggest that (when the time comes) 
> you consider developing in proper rather than the sandbox. subversion 
> provides a number of options which weren't available in cvs.

No hurry on having a look at the code. However I have posted javadoc for
the new code here:
  http://www.apache.org/~skitching/digester2-javadoc/api/index.html

So while you're waiting for your new machine, you've now got something
to do Robert :-)


Re developing digester2 in proper: well, it really depends upon whether
there is consensus on the ideas I am putting forward. If people are
unsure, and want to see a more complete framework before saying yea/nay
then sandbox might be more appropriate. If we all agree on the basics,
then proper would be fine.

But yes, it's so much easier to manage branches with svn. Of course
there's no problem either with using "svn cp" to copy from
digester-proper into the sandbox, ie make the sandbox contain a branch
of Digester, right? [go subversion!]


Cheers,

Simon




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org