You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Dennis Gearon <ge...@sbcglobal.net> on 2011/01/23 20:35:06 UTC
one last questoni on dynamic fields
Is it possible to use ONE definition of a dynamic field type for inserting
mulitple dynamic fields of that type with different names? Or do I need a
seperate dynamic field definition for each eventual field?
Can I do this?
<in schema.xml>
<field name="ALL_OTHER_STANDARD_FILEDS" type="OTHER_TYPES"
indexed="SOME_TIMES" stored="USUALLY"/>
<dynamicField name="*_i" type="int" indexed="true" stored="true"/>
.
.
</in schema.xml>
and then doing for insert
<add>
<doc>
<field name="ALL_OTHER_STANDARD_FILEDS">all their values<field>
<field name="customA_i">9802490824908<field>
<field name="customB_i">9809084<field>
<field name="customC_i">09845970011<field>
<field name="customD_i">09874523459870<field>
</doc>
</add>
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
----------------
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a better
idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself.
from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Re: one last questoni on dynamic fields
Posted by Stefan Matheis <ma...@googlemail.com>.
Yes, you can =) Prefix & Suffix, both is working fine
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Geert-Jan Brits <gb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep you can. Although I'm not sure you can use a wildcard-prefix. (perhaps
> you can I'm just not sure) . I always use wildcard-suffixes.
>
> Cheers,
> Geert-Jan
>
> 2011/1/23 Dennis Gearon <ge...@sbcglobal.net>
>
> > Is it possible to use ONE definition of a dynamic field type for
> inserting
> > mulitple dynamic fields of that type with different names? Or do I need a
> > seperate dynamic field definition for each eventual field?
> >
> > Can I do this?
> > <in schema.xml>
> > <field name="ALL_OTHER_STANDARD_FILEDS" type="OTHER_TYPES"
> > indexed="SOME_TIMES" stored="USUALLY"/>
> > <dynamicField name="*_i" type="int" indexed="true" stored="true"/>
> > .
> > .
> > </in schema.xml>
> >
> >
> > and then doing for insert
> > <add>
> > <doc>
> > <field name="ALL_OTHER_STANDARD_FILEDS">all their values<field>
> > <field name="customA_i">9802490824908<field>
> > <field name="customB_i">9809084<field>
> > <field name="customC_i">09845970011<field>
> > <field name="customD_i">09874523459870<field>
> > </doc>
> > </add>
> >
> > Dennis Gearon
> >
> >
> > Signature Warning
> > ----------------
> > It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
> > better
> > idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them
> > yourself.
> > from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
> >
> >
> > EARTH has a Right To Life,
> > otherwise we all die.
> >
> >
>
Re: one last questoni on dynamic fields
Posted by Geert-Jan Brits <gb...@gmail.com>.
Yep you can. Although I'm not sure you can use a wildcard-prefix. (perhaps
you can I'm just not sure) . I always use wildcard-suffixes.
Cheers,
Geert-Jan
2011/1/23 Dennis Gearon <ge...@sbcglobal.net>
> Is it possible to use ONE definition of a dynamic field type for inserting
> mulitple dynamic fields of that type with different names? Or do I need a
> seperate dynamic field definition for each eventual field?
>
> Can I do this?
> <in schema.xml>
> <field name="ALL_OTHER_STANDARD_FILEDS" type="OTHER_TYPES"
> indexed="SOME_TIMES" stored="USUALLY"/>
> <dynamicField name="*_i" type="int" indexed="true" stored="true"/>
> .
> .
> </in schema.xml>
>
>
> and then doing for insert
> <add>
> <doc>
> <field name="ALL_OTHER_STANDARD_FILEDS">all their values<field>
> <field name="customA_i">9802490824908<field>
> <field name="customB_i">9809084<field>
> <field name="customC_i">09845970011<field>
> <field name="customD_i">09874523459870<field>
> </doc>
> </add>
>
> Dennis Gearon
>
>
> Signature Warning
> ----------------
> It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
> better
> idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them
> yourself.
> from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
>
>
> EARTH has a Right To Life,
> otherwise we all die.
>
>