You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Dima Spivak <di...@apache.org> on 2016/09/07 15:58:13 UTC
branch-2: Judgement Day
Hi all,
I remember that Nick pointed this out a while back, but I see a stray
branch-2 on GitHub again [1]. Can we kill it?
1. https://github.com/apache/hbase/commits/branch-2
Re: branch-2: Judgement Day
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
There is work of introducing AsyncRegion (see HBASE-16505).
This would be done by the end of September.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Matteo Bertozzi <th...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> the idea of end of semptember is to cut the branch, to be able to work on
> fixing stuff.
> AM, backup, offheap/protobuf/... will probably not be fully finished. but
> the idea is to have testing running and fixes and finishes on those
> feature.
>
> the fs API is probably ok to backport even at late stage, and it can
> probably be done on a branch-1.x since it's all hidden behind
> server/private interface.
> but major stuff that have no code yet, are probably not going to make 2.0
>
>
> Matteo
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > New filesystem layout def not ready by end of sep. API changes maybe.
> >
> > On Sep 7, 2016 11:47, "Dima Spivak" <di...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > New filesystem layout?
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, September 7, 2016, Matteo Bertozzi <
> > theo.bertozzi@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > my idea was to cut branch-2 when we have the new AM.
> > > > my guess is that a fully working AM that we can consider for
> inclusion
> > > will
> > > > bring us to end of september.
> > > >
> > > > other stuff in 2.0 that are in-progress are
> > > > - the offheap work/memstore-compaction/protobuf3
> > > > - the backup work
> > > > - HLC support
> > > >
> > > > anything else big am I missing?
> > > >
> > > > Matteo
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, let's kill it.
> > > > >
> > > > > We should talk about 2.0. I'm winding down RM of 0.98 branch and
> the
> > > time
> > > > > I've had available for that can go into something, IMHO, more
> useful
> > > for
> > > > > project momentum like making 2.0 real. I'd like to help. Can we /
> > > should
> > > > we
> > > > > branch for 2.0 relatively soon?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dima Spivak <dimaspivak@apache.org
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I remember that Nick pointed this out a while back, but I see a
> > stray
> > > > > > branch-2 on GitHub again [1]. Can we kill it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. https://github.com/apache/hbase/commits/branch-2
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -Dima
> > >
> >
>
Re: branch-2: Judgement Day
Posted by Matteo Bertozzi <th...@gmail.com>.
the idea of end of semptember is to cut the branch, to be able to work on
fixing stuff.
AM, backup, offheap/protobuf/... will probably not be fully finished. but
the idea is to have testing running and fixes and finishes on those
feature.
the fs API is probably ok to backport even at late stage, and it can
probably be done on a branch-1.x since it's all hidden behind
server/private interface.
but major stuff that have no code yet, are probably not going to make 2.0
Matteo
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> New filesystem layout def not ready by end of sep. API changes maybe.
>
> On Sep 7, 2016 11:47, "Dima Spivak" <di...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > New filesystem layout?
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 7, 2016, Matteo Bertozzi <
> theo.bertozzi@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > my idea was to cut branch-2 when we have the new AM.
> > > my guess is that a fully working AM that we can consider for inclusion
> > will
> > > bring us to end of september.
> > >
> > > other stuff in 2.0 that are in-progress are
> > > - the offheap work/memstore-compaction/protobuf3
> > > - the backup work
> > > - HLC support
> > >
> > > anything else big am I missing?
> > >
> > > Matteo
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, let's kill it.
> > > >
> > > > We should talk about 2.0. I'm winding down RM of 0.98 branch and the
> > time
> > > > I've had available for that can go into something, IMHO, more useful
> > for
> > > > project momentum like making 2.0 real. I'd like to help. Can we /
> > should
> > > we
> > > > branch for 2.0 relatively soon?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dima Spivak <dimaspivak@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I remember that Nick pointed this out a while back, but I see a
> stray
> > > > > branch-2 on GitHub again [1]. Can we kill it?
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. https://github.com/apache/hbase/commits/branch-2
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Dima
> >
>
Re: branch-2: Judgement Day
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>.
New filesystem layout def not ready by end of sep. API changes maybe.
On Sep 7, 2016 11:47, "Dima Spivak" <di...@apache.org> wrote:
> New filesystem layout?
>
> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016, Matteo Bertozzi <th...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > my idea was to cut branch-2 when we have the new AM.
> > my guess is that a fully working AM that we can consider for inclusion
> will
> > bring us to end of september.
> >
> > other stuff in 2.0 that are in-progress are
> > - the offheap work/memstore-compaction/protobuf3
> > - the backup work
> > - HLC support
> >
> > anything else big am I missing?
> >
> > Matteo
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, let's kill it.
> > >
> > > We should talk about 2.0. I'm winding down RM of 0.98 branch and the
> time
> > > I've had available for that can go into something, IMHO, more useful
> for
> > > project momentum like making 2.0 real. I'd like to help. Can we /
> should
> > we
> > > branch for 2.0 relatively soon?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dima Spivak <dimaspivak@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I remember that Nick pointed this out a while back, but I see a stray
> > > > branch-2 on GitHub again [1]. Can we kill it?
> > > >
> > > > 1. https://github.com/apache/hbase/commits/branch-2
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> -Dima
>
Re: branch-2: Judgement Day
Posted by Dima Spivak <di...@apache.org>.
New filesystem layout?
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016, Matteo Bertozzi <th...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> my idea was to cut branch-2 when we have the new AM.
> my guess is that a fully working AM that we can consider for inclusion will
> bring us to end of september.
>
> other stuff in 2.0 that are in-progress are
> - the offheap work/memstore-compaction/protobuf3
> - the backup work
> - HLC support
>
> anything else big am I missing?
>
> Matteo
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Yes, let's kill it.
> >
> > We should talk about 2.0. I'm winding down RM of 0.98 branch and the time
> > I've had available for that can go into something, IMHO, more useful for
> > project momentum like making 2.0 real. I'd like to help. Can we / should
> we
> > branch for 2.0 relatively soon?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dima Spivak <dimaspivak@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I remember that Nick pointed this out a while back, but I see a stray
> > > branch-2 on GitHub again [1]. Can we kill it?
> > >
> > > 1. https://github.com/apache/hbase/commits/branch-2
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
-Dima
Re: branch-2: Judgement Day
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
End of September as rough timeframe? That's pretty close at hand. Ok by me.
I'm getting up to speed on master branch. I've been away a while in the
dust and cobwebs of releases past.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Matteo Bertozzi <th...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> my idea was to cut branch-2 when we have the new AM.
> my guess is that a fully working AM that we can consider for inclusion will
> bring us to end of september.
>
> other stuff in 2.0 that are in-progress are
> - the offheap work/memstore-compaction/protobuf3
> - the backup work
> - HLC support
>
> anything else big am I missing?
>
> Matteo
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, let's kill it.
> >
> > We should talk about 2.0. I'm winding down RM of 0.98 branch and the time
> > I've had available for that can go into something, IMHO, more useful for
> > project momentum like making 2.0 real. I'd like to help. Can we / should
> we
> > branch for 2.0 relatively soon?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dima Spivak <di...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I remember that Nick pointed this out a while back, but I see a stray
> > > branch-2 on GitHub again [1]. Can we kill it?
> > >
> > > 1. https://github.com/apache/hbase/commits/branch-2
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: branch-2: Judgement Day
Posted by Matteo Bertozzi <th...@gmail.com>.
my idea was to cut branch-2 when we have the new AM.
my guess is that a fully working AM that we can consider for inclusion will
bring us to end of september.
other stuff in 2.0 that are in-progress are
- the offheap work/memstore-compaction/protobuf3
- the backup work
- HLC support
anything else big am I missing?
Matteo
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, let's kill it.
>
> We should talk about 2.0. I'm winding down RM of 0.98 branch and the time
> I've had available for that can go into something, IMHO, more useful for
> project momentum like making 2.0 real. I'd like to help. Can we / should we
> branch for 2.0 relatively soon?
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dima Spivak <di...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I remember that Nick pointed this out a while back, but I see a stray
> > branch-2 on GitHub again [1]. Can we kill it?
> >
> > 1. https://github.com/apache/hbase/commits/branch-2
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: branch-2: Judgement Day
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Yes, let's kill it.
We should talk about 2.0. I'm winding down RM of 0.98 branch and the time
I've had available for that can go into something, IMHO, more useful for
project momentum like making 2.0 real. I'd like to help. Can we / should we
branch for 2.0 relatively soon?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dima Spivak <di...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I remember that Nick pointed this out a while back, but I see a stray
> branch-2 on GitHub again [1]. Can we kill it?
>
> 1. https://github.com/apache/hbase/commits/branch-2
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)