You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@atlas.apache.org by Sarath Subramanian <sa...@apache.org> on 2018/03/23 21:24:20 UTC

Review Request 66261: [ATLAS-2514]: Deleting a table with lineage should not remove propagated classification edges

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for atlas, Apoorv Naik, Ashutosh Mestry, and Madhan Neethiraj.


Bugs: ATLAS-2514
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-2514


Repository: atlas


Description
-------

When a table with tag assigned is deleted, the propagated classification edges to the downstream entities should not be removed.


Diffs
-----

  repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/DeleteHandlerV1.java 18ed533d 
  repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/SoftDeleteHandlerV1.java 49c9e0ca 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/diff/1/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Sarath Subramanian


Re: Review Request 66261: [ATLAS-2514]: Deleting a table with lineage should not remove propagated classification edges

Posted by Madhan Neethiraj <ma...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/#review199987
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Madhan Neethiraj


On March 26, 2018, 4:18 p.m., Sarath Subramanian wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 26, 2018, 4:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas, Apoorv Naik, Ashutosh Mestry, and Madhan Neethiraj.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ATLAS-2514
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-2514
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When a table with tag assigned is deleted, the propagated classification edges to the downstream entities should not be removed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java 9e8077cb 
>   repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/DeleteHandlerV1.java 18ed533d 
>   repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/SoftDeleteHandlerV1.java 49c9e0ca 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sarath Subramanian
> 
>


Re: Review Request 66261: [ATLAS-2514]: Deleting a table with lineage should not remove propagated classification edges

Posted by Sarath Subramanian <sa...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated March 26, 2018, 9:18 a.m.)


Review request for atlas, Apoorv Naik, Ashutosh Mestry, and Madhan Neethiraj.


Changes
-------

addressed review comments from Madhan.


Bugs: ATLAS-2514
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-2514


Repository: atlas


Description
-------

When a table with tag assigned is deleted, the propagated classification edges to the downstream entities should not be removed.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graph/GraphHelper.java 9e8077cb 
  repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/DeleteHandlerV1.java 18ed533d 
  repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/SoftDeleteHandlerV1.java 49c9e0ca 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/diff/2/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/diff/1-2/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Sarath Subramanian


Re: Review Request 66261: [ATLAS-2514]: Deleting a table with lineage should not remove propagated classification edges

Posted by Madhan Neethiraj <ma...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/#review199921
-----------------------------------------------------------




repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/DeleteHandlerV1.java
Line 500 (original), 498 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/#comment280431>

    Getting classificationNames above (line #492) would have iterated through edges named as 'classifiedAs'. The same edges are retrieved again in the 'for' loop below (like #499). Consider adding a method "List<AtlasEdge> getClassificationEdges(entityVertex)" and use the returned edges in following "for" loop.



repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/DeleteHandlerV1.java
Lines 693 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/#comment280430>

    instanceVertex => classificationVertex


- Madhan Neethiraj


On March 23, 2018, 9:24 p.m., Sarath Subramanian wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 23, 2018, 9:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas, Apoorv Naik, Ashutosh Mestry, and Madhan Neethiraj.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ATLAS-2514
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-2514
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When a table with tag assigned is deleted, the propagated classification edges to the downstream entities should not be removed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/DeleteHandlerV1.java 18ed533d 
>   repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/SoftDeleteHandlerV1.java 49c9e0ca 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66261/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sarath Subramanian
> 
>