You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Chris Pepper <pe...@reppep.com> on 2007/07/23 04:56:08 UTC
Re: Patch for trunk/mod/mod_ssl.xml
At 1:06 AM +0100 6/9/07, Tony Stevenson wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Please find attached my patch for trunk/mod/mod_ssl.xml
>This has been brought about following issue 38698
>[http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38698]
>Index: mod_ssl.xml
>===================================================================
>--- mod_ssl.xml (revision 545655)
>+++ mod_ssl.xml (working copy)
>@@ -519,21 +519,21 @@
> <li><code>SSLv2</code>
> <p>
> This is the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol, version 2.0. It is the
>- original SSL protocol as designed by Netscape Corporation.</p></li>
>+ original SSL protocol as designed by Netscape Corporation. It's use has
s/It's/Its/
>+ been depreciated in recent years because of weaknesses in the security
>+ of the protocol.</p></li>
--
Chris Pepper: <http://www.reppep.com/~pepper/>
The Rockefeller University: <http://www.rockefeller.edu/>
** I will be on vacation July 23-27, returning July 30.
** Please call the Help Desk at x8940 if you need assistance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Patch for trunk/mod/mod_ssl.xml
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > An argument can be made that something "has depreciated",
> > but it is never the case that something "has been depreciated".
>
> Heh, I should never say never this early on a Monday morning.
> A counter-example has already been provided, so that last sentence
> is now deprecated as well.
Aha!
Thanks, nd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Patch for trunk/mod/mod_ssl.xml
Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
On Jul 23, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> An argument can be made that something "has depreciated",
> but it is never the case that something "has been depreciated".
Heh, I should never say never this early on a Monday morning.
A counter-example has already been provided, so that last sentence
is now deprecated as well.
....Roy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Patch for trunk/mod/mod_ssl.xml
Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
On Jul 23, 2007, at 1:23 AM, André Malo wrote:
> * Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
>
>
>> On 7/23/07, Chris Pepper <pe...@reppep.com> wrote:
>>> ===================================================================
>>>
>>>> --- mod_ssl.xml (revision 545655)
>>>> +++ mod_ssl.xml (working copy)
>>>> @@ -519,21 +519,21 @@
>>>>
>>>> + been depreciated in recent years because of weaknesses in the
>>>> security
>>
>> s/depreciated/deprecated/
>
> Maybe it's my non-native English, but I think, depreciated fits
> perfectly
> here...
It should be deprecated. It is probably one of the top 10 spelling
mistakes by programmers, since it won't be found by a spell checker
and depreciated is a more commonly used word.
An argument can be made that something "has depreciated",
but it is never the case that something "has been depreciated".
....Roy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Patch for trunk/mod/mod_ssl.xml
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
> On 7/23/07, Chris Pepper <pe...@reppep.com> wrote:
> >===================================================================
> >
> > >--- mod_ssl.xml (revision 545655)
> > >+++ mod_ssl.xml (working copy)
> > >@@ -519,21 +519,21 @@
> > >
> > >+ been depreciated in recent years because of weaknesses in the
> > > security
>
> s/depreciated/deprecated/
Maybe it's my non-native English, but I think, depreciated fits perfectly
here...
nd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Patch for trunk/mod/mod_ssl.xml
Posted by Nóirín Plunkett <no...@apache.org>.
On 7/23/07, Chris Pepper <pe...@reppep.com> wrote:
>===================================================================
> >--- mod_ssl.xml (revision 545655)
> >+++ mod_ssl.xml (working copy)
> >@@ -519,21 +519,21 @@
> >+ been depreciated in recent years because of weaknesses in the security
s/depreciated/deprecated/
> >+ of the protocol.</p></li>
N
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org