[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-575) Shorthand Notation should be called regular notation

["Nathan Bubna (JIRA)" <de...@velocity.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628213#action_12628213 ] 

Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-575:
---------------------------------------

i disagree that it's confusing to call "shorthand notation" as such before mentioning any other kind.  there doesn't have to be a "regular notation" for there to be a shorthand.  having a formal notation is a sufficient counterpoint.  i'm just going to change the VTL reference to say "shorthand".

> Shorthand Notation should be called regular notation
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: VELOCITY-575
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-575
>             Project: Velocity
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Spencer Davis
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In the User Guide, it shows the "shorthand" notation for references but does not
> mention any other notation until the section about formal notation. In the VTL
> Reference, it calls the same notation "regular" notation. The User Guide should
> be changed so that it is consistent with the reference. This also prevents confusion
>  about calling it shorthand without mentioning any other notations until much later on.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@velocity.apache.org